HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-02-2011, 02:30 AM   #1
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,783
sequential vs concurrent chemo, herceptin compared

J Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct 31. [Epub ahead of print]
Sequential Versus Concurrent Trastuzumab in Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.
Perez EA, Suman VJ, Davidson NE, Gralow JR, Kaufman PA, Visscher DW, Chen B, Ingle JN, Dakhil SR, Zujewski J, Moreno-Aspitia A, Pisansky TM, Jenkins RB.
Source
Edith A. Perez and Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Vera J. Suman, Daniel W. Visscher, Beiyun Chen, James N. Ingle, Thomas M. Pisansky, and Robert B. Jenkins, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Nancy E. Davidson, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Julie R. Gralow, Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle, WA; Peter A. Kaufman, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Hanover, NH; Shaker R. Dakhil, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; and JoAnne Zujewski, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Abstract
PURPOSENCCTG (North Central Cancer Treatment Group) N9831 is the only randomized phase III trial evaluating trastuzumab added sequentially or used concurrently with chemotherapy in resected stages I to III invasive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODSPatients received doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by paclitaxel weekly for 12 weeks (arm A), paclitaxel plus sequential trastuzumab weekly for 52 weeks (arm B), or paclitaxel plus concurrent trastuzumab for 12 weeks followed by trastuzumab for 40 weeks (arm C). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS).ResultsComparison of arm A (n = 1,087) and arm B (n = 1,097), with 6-year median follow-up and 390 events, revealed 5-year DFS rates of 71.8% and 80.1%, respectively. DFS was significantly increased with trastuzumab added sequentially to paclitaxel (log-rank P < .001; arm B/arm A hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.85). Comparison of arm B (n = 954) and arm C (n = 949), with 6-year median follow-up and 313 events, revealed 5-year DFS rates of 80.1% and 84.4%, respectively. There was an increase in DFS with concurrent trastuzumab and paclitaxel relative to sequential administration (arm C/arm B HR, 0.77; 99.9% CI, 0.53 to 1.11), but the P value (.02) did not cross the prespecified O'Brien-Fleming boundary (.00116) for the interim analysis. CONCLUSIONDFS was significantly improved with 52 weeks of trastuzumab added to adjuvant chemotherapy. On the basis of a positive risk-benefit ratio, we recommend that trastuzumab be incorporated into a concurrent regimen with taxane chemotherapy as an important standard-of-care treatment alternative to a sequential regimen.

PMID: 22042958
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 04:02 AM   #2
Ellie F
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,526
Re: sequential vs concurrent chemo, herceptin compared

Thanks Lani
My second opinion onc believed this to be the case even though it is not standard in England for early stage bc.I always knew he was a smart cookie!
Ellie
Ellie F is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter