I have pasted below the blurb on the relevant MD Anderson trial, published in Feb. 2005 in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, because this seems to be closest to what you are getting. Are you getting the rest of a year of herceptin afterwards? If you are not, then you are getting this trial combo.
To qualify for this trial, patients needed to have the following, so you need to keep in mind whether you would have matched the trial criteria:
"Normal cardiac ejection fraction per echocardiogram.
Negative history for congestive heart failure. If history of cardiac arrhythmia, eligible after cleared by cardiology."
It should also be kept in mind that the one of the other trials using an anthracycline (adriamycin, which is harder on the heart than FEC) indicated that the heart damage peaked about eighteen months out, so the figure of 7 might not accurately reflect the potential of this combination to cause heart problems. Seven still means that 1/3 of the women who participated who had a 10%+ decline in left ventricular ejection fraction. On the other hand, the complete pathological response figure is brilliant.
I double checked the trials and on FinHer there was no decline in left-ventricular fraction. In fact, the women who got the herceptin seemed to be slightly less likely to have heart problems. That combo was (herceptin+taxotere)->FEC 60 (60mg per sq. meter of body surface area), but FEC60 is outmoded. (I can't tell from your prescription what you are on because I don't know your weight and height). Anyway, FinHer indicates that there aren't necessarily problems giving herceptin after epirubicin. FinHer has had a three-year followup, during which time absolutely no adverse heart problems were noticed.
It is believed that part of the reason that FinHer lacked cardiotoxicity is that putting herceptin before anthracyclines might actually lessen the heart damage caused by anthracyclines; however herceptin given together with FEC is still a potentially risky combo. Perhaps your doctor knows something about the results of this M.D. Anderson trial that make him feel that it would be safe, but it would be good to check, especially since you are concerned about your heart. Anyway, here is the blurb:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
A Buzdar et al.
Significantly higher pathologic complete remission rate after neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab, paclitaxel, and epirubicin chemotherapy: results of a randomized trial in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/q...=pubmed_docsum
Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 424, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine whether the addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting could increase pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients with HER2-positive disease with operable breast cancer were randomly assigned to either four cycles of paclitaxel followed by four cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide or to the same chemotherapy with simultaneous weekly trastuzumab for 24 weeks. The primary objective was to demonstrate a 20% improvement in pCR (assumed 21% to 41%) with the addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy. The planned sample size was 164 patients. RESULTS: Prognostic factors were similar in the two groups. After 34 patients had completed therapy, the trial's Data Monitoring Committee stopped the trial because of superiority of trastuzumab plus chemotherapy. pCR rates were 25% and 66.7% for chemotherapy (n = 16) and trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (n = 18), respectively (P = .02). The decision was based on the calculation that, if study continued to 164 patients, there was a 95% probability that trastuzumab plus chemotherapy would be superior. Of the 42 randomized patients, 26% in the chemotherapy arm achieved pCR compared with 65.2% in the trastuzumab plus chemotherapy arm (P = .016). The safety of this approach is not established, although no clinical congestive heart failure was observed. A more than 10% decrease in the cardiac ejection fraction was observed in five and seven patients in the chemotherapy and trastuzumab plus chemotherapy arms, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite the small sample size, these data indicate that adding trastuzumab to chemotherapy, as used in this trial, significantly increased pCR without clinical congestive heart failure.