|
Snb
Dear Jill,
My personal opinion is that she absolutely should have a SNB. How else in the world will she have an accurate staging without taking a look at the axillary nodes? in case you never read about my Mom, I will justify my position on the matter. Mom's surgeon did not even do a needle biopsy before the surgery. There was also no SNB, because the surgeon was POSITIVE they knew what cell type they would find, and that Tamoxifen would be the answer after a lumpectomy. One enlarged node was taken, and it was found to be disease free. But there was no assurance it was one of the sentinel nodes.
Well guess what! The cancer turned out to be HER2+++, ER-, PR-. Then, eight months later her axillary nodes blew up over a period of a week. Biopsy of them confirmed more cancer, and not just a little bit. The following axillary dissection revealed a horrifying 12 of 20 nodes positive for disease. I was sick at my stomach. So Mom went through the radiation all over again, trying to contain the cancer to the lymph nodes. Had she known in the beginning that there was disease in her axillary nodes, it might have been stopped cold right there with a larger radiation field. Now we are into Herceptin, and as many helpful supplements as we can find, as Mom is older and cannot tolerate standard chemotherapies. I know that people are sick of hearing our particular tale of woe, but I just want people to remember that it is what you DON'T know that can really hurt you. Anything less than the maximum possible information that can be obtained, is just plain stupid. I believe that the current treatment protocols are recommending SNB in all cases, but you'll have to check.
Good Luck,
Tom
|