|
Hi Becky,
The verdict is in about Herceptin (H) + Tamoxifen (T), that is, HER2+ make the cancer resistant to T therapy and when combined with H it actually causes disease proliferation. The question about AI's is a different one. One study has shown that AI's in HER2 BC has a Time to treatment failure (TTF) of 5.6 mos where the TTF of AI's in HER-(-) BC was 11.6 months. This still suggests that there is some x-talk between HER2 and the AI mechanisms.
On the other hand, there is a study quoted in this article where the end point is a 33% reduction in Time to progression for H + Letrozole (an AI) vs Letrozole olone.
I think in his closing arguments, the author is suggesting that in HER2+/ER+ BC; AI's alone is sub-optimal and the way of the future will be H+ AI's To Quote: "....suggest that combining treatments that target these different pathways may provide additional clinical benefits for patients with breast cancer." and, "together the evidence suggests that targeted non-chemotherapeutic combinations of trastuzumab with hormonal therapy, which are currently being studied in large-scale clinical trials, represent the future of cancer therapy, allowing the individualisation of treatment based on tumour characteristics."
Keep in mind that this is one man's view and the jury is still out! Under no circumstances would I try to co-medicate with any type of Chemo and AI's.
Confusingly yours,
Al
|