HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-15-2005, 11:26 AM   #1
eric
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Nanoparticles carry cancer-killing drugs into tumor cells

Nanoparticles carry cancer-killing drugs into tumor cells
Increased efficacy, lower drug toxicity in mice

ANN ARBOR, Mich. – University of Michigan scientists have created the nanotechnology equivalent of a Trojan horse to smuggle a powerful chemotherapeutic drug inside tumor cells – increasing the drug's cancer-killing activity and reducing its toxic side effects.
Previous studies in cell cultures have suggested that attaching anticancer drugs to nanoparticles for targeted delivery to tumor cells could increase the therapeutic response. Now, U-M scientists have shown that this nanotechnology-based treatment is effective in living animals.

"This is the first study to demonstrate a nanoparticle-targeted drug actually leaving the bloodstream, being concentrated in cancer cells, and having a biological effect on the animal's tumor," says James R. Baker Jr., M.D., the Ruth Dow Doan Professor of Biologic Nanotechnology at the University of Michigan, who directed the study.

"We're very optimistic that nanotechnology can markedly improve cancer therapy," says Baker, who directs the Michigan Nanotechnology Institute for Medicine and the Biological Sciences. "Targeting drugs directly to cancer cells reduces the amount that gets to normal cells, increases the drug's anti-cancer effect and reduces its toxicity. By improving the therapeutic index of cancer drugs, we hope to turn cancer into a chronic, manageable disease."

Results of the study will be published in the June 15, 2005, issue of Cancer Research.

The drug delivery vehicle used by U-M scientists is a manmade polymer molecule called a dendrimer. Less than five nanometers in diameter, these dendrimers are small enough to slip through tiny openings in cell membranes. One nanometer equals one-billionth of a meter, which means it would take 100,000 nanometers lined up side-by-side to equal the diameter of a human hair.

Dendrimers have a tree-like structure with many branches where scientists can attach a variety of molecules, including drugs. In experiments reported in Cancer Research, U-M scientists attached methotrexate, a powerful anticancer drug, to branches of the dendrimer. On other branches, they attached fluorescent imaging agents and their secret ingredient – a vitamin called folic acid.

Folic acid, or folate, is an important vitamin required for the healthy functioning of all cells. But cancer cells, in particular, seem to need more than average amounts. To soak up as much folate as possible, some cancer cells display more docking sites called folate receptors on their cell membranes. By taking advantage of a cancer cell's appetite for folate, U-M scientists are able to prevent the cells from developing resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs.

"It's like a Trojan horse," Baker explains. "Folate molecules on the nanoparticle bind to receptors on tumor cell membranes and the cell immediately internalizes it, because it thinks it's getting the vitamin it needs. But while it's bringing folate across the cell membrane, the cell also draws in the methotrexate that will poison it."

In conventional chemotherapy, drugs like methotrexate must diffuse across a cell membrane to get inside cancer cells, according to Baker. It's a slow process and requires a high concentration of drug in the extra-cellular fluid, which can damage normal cells and tissues.

When tested in laboratory mice that had received injections of human epithelial cancer cells, the nanoparticle-based therapy using folic acid and methotrexate was 10 times more effective at delaying tumor growth than the drug given alone. Nanoparticle treatment also proved to be far less toxic to mice in the study than the anticancer drug alone.

"In our longest trial, which lasted 99 days, 30 percent to 40 percent of the mice given the nanoparticle with methotrexate survived," says Jolanta Kukowska-Latallo, Ph.D., a U-M research investigator and first author of the study. "All the mice receiving free methotrexate died – either from overgrowth of the tumor or from toxic effects of the drug.

"We saw statistically significant tumor growth reduction in all the mice given targeted nanoparticle therapy, as opposed to mice receiving either free methotrexate or the dendrimer alone," adds Kukowska-Latallo. "Effectively, we achieved a 30-day tumor growth delay. Taking into account the length of a mouse's life, that is significant. One month for a mouse is about three years for a person."

Before they began to study the effects of targeted nanoparticle therapy on cancer, U-M scientists injected dendrimers with fluorescent tags into the bloodstream of laboratory mice to determine where they would be retained in the body. The results showed that the kidneys quickly filtered free nanoparticles from blood and eliminated them in urine. The researchers found no evidence that nanoparticles were able to leave the bloodstream and enter the brain. The nanoparticles did not appear to generate an immune response in mice in the study.

In future research, scientists at the Michigan Nanotechnology Institute will determine the maximum therapeutic dose, in research animals, of targeted nanotherapy with methotrexate, and complete other preliminary studies in preparation for the first human clinical trial, which Baker says is scheduled to begin within two years.

Researchers at the Michigan Nanotechnology Institute also are planning to explore the use of nanotechnology-based therapies using other chemotherapeutic drugs. "There are many cancer drugs that are very effective, but they can't be used now, because they are too toxic," Baker says. "If these drugs can be delivered with a targeted nanoparticle system, we may be able to overcome the toxicity problem and provide a broader range of therapeutic agents for people with cancer."

By attaching different targeting molecules and different drugs to the nanoparticle, Baker believes scientists eventually will be able to develop effective therapies for many types of cancer, perhaps even personalized therapy for an individual's specific cancer.

The research was funded by the National Cancer Institute. The University of Michigan has filed a patent application on targeted nanoparticle technology. A licensing agreement is currently being negotiated with Avidimer Therapeutics, a biopharmaceutical company in Ann Arbor, Mich. Baker holds a significant financial interest in the company.

Other U-M collaborators in the research study are Zhengyi Cao, M.D., and Shraddha S. Nigavekar, Ph.D., U-M research associates; Istvan J. Majoros, Ph.D., research investigator; and Thommey P. Thomas, Ph.D., assistant research professor. Additional collaborators who were formerly with the U-M are Lajos P. Balogh, Ph.D., Kimberly A. Candido, and Mohamed K. Khan, M.D


###
Citation: Cancer Research 2005: 65 (12), June 15, 2005 Editors: Color images showing a computer model of the U-M nanoparticle and mice from the study are available on request.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2005, 11:58 AM   #2
*_Christine MH_*
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Eric,

There's something called DHA paclitaxel which does the same sort of thing and is in trials. It is a molecule of DHA (yes, the fish oil) attached to a molecule of paclitaxel (the active ingredient in taxol). The cancer drags in the oil bit because cancers also are gluttons for that (even though DHA generally chemosensitizes cancers) and the paclitaxel deploys when the cell sucks the DHA in. It is in trials already, but I can't remember whether phase II or III. I know in phase I there was hardly any neuropathy, even though the dosing of paclitaxel used was much higher than standard taxol.

Such clever people these scientists!
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2005, 05:40 PM   #3
eric
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Great stuff! Thanks, Eric
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2005, 10:32 PM   #4
Curious
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
There is one section of the article that caught my eye. It is the section that discusses the importance of folic acid to the growth of malignant cells. I have been giving my Mom 2.5 mg of folic acid/day, as part of her vitamin regimen. This is equivalent to the amount found in the Rx drug FoltX, which is used to treat hyperhomocysteinemia, which is a factor in heart disease and vascular disease. Now I must rethink that dose, or even supplementing her folic acid at all. Any thoughts or scientific info on the matter would be appreciated.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2005, 02:46 PM   #5
*_Christine MH_*
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wondered what ever happened to DHA paclitaxel. Received FDA fast-track approval for pancreatic, esophageal and metastatic melanoma and is in phase III trials for pancreatic and metastatic melanoma. Now called taxoprexin. Not clear if they went for these cancers because these were ones with the best response or because there are few good options for these types that they represent a guaranteed market. The inventing company went bankrupt and the technology sold to a company that now is carrying out the trials.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter