HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-21-2004, 10:54 PM   #1
Lyn
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Just wondering which is better or should I say more accurate. My uncle had a PET scan saying all was clear and he died about 2 months later, original spread to bone,lungs,liver brain, I know in my last flare up it was only the MRI that found it but I have never had a PET scan but I want the brain done this time when I finish my combo.

Love & Hugs Lyn
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2004, 11:48 PM   #2
Pam P
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
As I understand it, I think a lot depends on what they're looking for. They're all sensitive tests with different technologies, but none of them perfect. I've heard MRI is best for checking brain, CT for tissue, organs, PET shows any possible cancer activity for both organ & bone. I'm not sure, but don't hear of PET being used for tracking brain mets. Probably others know much more than me, but hope this helps.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2004, 12:01 AM   #3
Ron
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Lyn,

Please let me encourage you to have the brain MRI as soon as possible. You may have to "Story" to the doctor, tell him/her you are having headaches. This will at least get you an MRI and establish a baseline.

Many times the protocols do not call for MRIs unless there are symptoms. Cyndi had no symptoms yet when an MRI was performed, there were multiple lesions. But because they were small, the treatment (radiation) was easier to endure.

The PET scan is an expensive test and at least my insurance company requires special documentation from the physician before authorization.

God Bless You,
ron
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2004, 06:33 AM   #4
Annemarie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Each test is specific. If you want to test for brain mets from bc the best test is the brain MRI the PET that my Dr. uses goes from the neck to the knees. CAT scan and bone scan should be used as first line to check for mets in other organs. If there is a question than PET. Each PET scan cost my insurance company $2k so protocal must be followed.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2004, 10:05 AM   #5
Lyn
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks


Love & Hugs Lyn
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2004, 02:48 PM   #6
Christine
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I always had MRI to follow up on brain mets, and this was always compared to the previous MRI. It has served me well. PET scans are mostly used as a body scan to check for malignancy, but not the brain. PET scans use radiation to detect tumors and is not usually recommended for brain scanning.
Hugs to all
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2004, 02:45 PM   #7
michele u
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Lyn.,,
I've had both done. I know the mRI's are better for brain met. But the PET scan be asked to do the brain down. I don't think it is as good for finding smaller mets, but i think it will pick one up. Like the other said ct is better for soft tissue things like liver,lung. my two pet scans were covered, they would just be restaging on the dx. They didn't have anytrouble with that. I have midlands choice.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter