HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-12-2006, 07:14 PM   #1
madubois63
Senior Member
 
madubois63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 660
>>Why would they not give you chemo if you were NED and had another met pop
up?<<

If another met popped up, then you would no longer NED and chemo may be warrented at that point...

I almost didn't reply here, because once again I am the exception to the rule. I have been NED since April of 2005 but continue to get chemo (except when my counts are low). I think it all depends on the oncologist, the patient and the diagnosis... I don't have met's in the bones, but it was 4 1/2 years between my original diagnosis and the reoccurance.
__________________
Maryann
Stage IV Inflammatory BC 1/00
Mod Rad Mastectomy 24nod/5+
Adriomycin Cytoxin Taxol
Tamoxifen 4 1/2 yrs
Radiation - 32 x
Metastatic BC lung/liver 10/04
thorocentesis 2x - pleurodesis
Herceptin Taxatiere Carbo
Femera/Lupron
BC NED 4/05
chemo induced Acute Myeloid Leukemia 5/06
Induction/consolidation chemo
bone marrow transplant - 11/3/06
Severe Host vs Graft Disease of liver
BC mets to lung 11/07
Fasoladex Herceptin Zometa Xeloda
GVHD/Iron overload to liver
Avascular Necrosis/morphine pump 10/10
metastatic brain tumor
steriotactic radiosurgery
madubois63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 07:56 PM   #2
Sandy H
Senior Member
 
Sandy H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norridgewock, Maine
Posts: 778
Maryann: I guess, I don't understand if you are NED why would you continue on chemo??? Would you not keep it for later? Besides how will your body or immune system build itself back up? I know you told me you would be on continuous chemo but I wasn't thinking at the time. I thought NED meant no evidence of disease and so no need for chemo. Maybe, my chemo brain isn't working these days. Hugs, Sandy
Sandy H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2006, 08:20 PM   #3
Esther
Senior Member
 
Esther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 484
If you are ER +, Aromasin as a first line of treatment is reasonable. If hormonals maintain you stable there would be no need for chemo yet. I would not push for chemo unless you were facing disease progression and needed to halt it quickly.

There are a limited number of chemo options, so you want to use them when they are truly needed.

I would discuss this with your onc, and get your questions answered.
Esther is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2006, 05:42 AM   #4
eric
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 589
I agree with Esther and Sandy; why do chemo if NED when you have an opportunity to allow your immune system to recover? I would imagine that your onc is hoping to kill off any micro cells but I like the idea of taking advantage of the time off and saving the somewhat limited ammo. I'm sure your doc is doing what he/she feels is best for you but why not discuss to ensure that you are most comfortable with this approach. I think the important thing to remember though is that there is no black and white, no right or wrong, so whatever you decide, don't second guess yourself.

Eric
eric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2006, 01:35 PM   #5
madubois63
Senior Member
 
madubois63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 660
Sandy - Although I have No Evidence of Disease at this time, I do have plueral effusions (minor) in my lungs. I had my lungs sealed so no further fluid can build up, which in turn also keeps the fluid in. I will most likely always have minor fluid in my lungs. When most of the fluid was drained 17 months ago, there were cancer cells floating in the fluid. There is no way to know if the remaining fluid has microscopic cancer cells floating around...so I am truly considered stable - not in remission. The chemo is keeping me stable and is considered a maintenance plan. My onc feels that if I stop chemo and it comes back then I will loose momentum and have to start all over again and it may be too late... Of course, this may not be the best thing for everyone else, but it works for me.
__________________
Maryann
Stage IV Inflammatory BC 1/00
Mod Rad Mastectomy 24nod/5+
Adriomycin Cytoxin Taxol
Tamoxifen 4 1/2 yrs
Radiation - 32 x
Metastatic BC lung/liver 10/04
thorocentesis 2x - pleurodesis
Herceptin Taxatiere Carbo
Femera/Lupron
BC NED 4/05
chemo induced Acute Myeloid Leukemia 5/06
Induction/consolidation chemo
bone marrow transplant - 11/3/06
Severe Host vs Graft Disease of liver
BC mets to lung 11/07
Fasoladex Herceptin Zometa Xeloda
GVHD/Iron overload to liver
Avascular Necrosis/morphine pump 10/10
metastatic brain tumor
steriotactic radiosurgery
madubois63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2006, 08:36 PM   #6
julierene
Senior Member
 
julierene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 327
Maryann,

what's a plueral effusion?

that makes good sense to me. i sometimes forget there are the gals in here too with inflammatory bc...

for most of us, we got NED and may take a little extra and then we are done with the chemo. for inflammatory, they probably treat it more aggressively.
julierene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2006, 05:32 AM   #7
madubois63
Senior Member
 
madubois63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 660
Pleural effusion is fluid build up in the lungs. The fluid (for me) is a byproduct of the cancer on the lung. I also had a build up of fluid on my heart, but that is gone now. Anyway. At first, it was thought that I had pneumonia so I was treated with antibiotics which of course didn't work. I then ended up in the ER and gained a pulmonary doctor. He drained my lung (thoracenticis). The fluid was sent to pathology and came back inconclusive. I went home thinking I had pneumonia - yeah. Before long, my lungs had filled up again (boo) and I set up VATs (video assisted) surgery with a thoracic surgeon which included a biopsy of my liver, throcenticis and Pleurodesis (sealing the lung with talc so that the lung and the chest wall stick together not allowing fluid to build up again). This surgery made my life livable. I could not even walk from my bed to the bathroom prior to the surgery - breathing was so difficult. That was 17 months ago and I am still going strong...
__________________
Maryann
Stage IV Inflammatory BC 1/00
Mod Rad Mastectomy 24nod/5+
Adriomycin Cytoxin Taxol
Tamoxifen 4 1/2 yrs
Radiation - 32 x
Metastatic BC lung/liver 10/04
thorocentesis 2x - pleurodesis
Herceptin Taxatiere Carbo
Femera/Lupron
BC NED 4/05
chemo induced Acute Myeloid Leukemia 5/06
Induction/consolidation chemo
bone marrow transplant - 11/3/06
Severe Host vs Graft Disease of liver
BC mets to lung 11/07
Fasoladex Herceptin Zometa Xeloda
GVHD/Iron overload to liver
Avascular Necrosis/morphine pump 10/10
metastatic brain tumor
steriotactic radiosurgery
madubois63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter