HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-03-2008, 11:41 AM   #1
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
its not just chemo vs not but antihormonal vs not and herceptin vs not

Before it was just a "judgement/guess" that perhaps breast cancer behaved differently than many other cancers because cutting it out and radiating it did not cure as many people as other cancers.

Now we have the technology to discover if that is true, machines to test for circulating tumor cells and better techniques to look for individual cells in bone marrow samples--yet those aren't hardly being used.

Here they showed in mice that they could see disssemination of tumor cells even from DCIS when her2 was present. To me, that means looking for signs of micrometasis when staging the breast cancer would make sense.

Also, many drugs languish for years being used for those with macrometastasis only, which could be tried at an earlier stage with the understanding if micrometastasis were looked for and found to see if that would impact the disease. That is just beginning with trials of herceptin with avastin in the adjuvant setting, but perhaps highrisk patients should no longer be defined by the number of lymph nodes positive, but by whether there are isolated tumor cells in their bone marrow.

I don't want to annoy people who will say, yes, but I could never get my oncologist to look for that, only to make people aware that evidence has been found for what oncologist only suspected and perhaps this knowledge should be used to look freshly upon how cancer is staged, clinical trials run and patients treated
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 07:41 PM   #2
penelope
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 153
from what I have read and have been told

almost all DCIS is her2+. I believe this is written in Susan Love's book as well as other papers.

If this is the case doesn't it make sense that more women would get mets with a diagnosis of DCIS only, but this does not seem the case.
__________________

penelope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 09:05 PM   #3
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
from an article from MD Anderson

Her2/neu overexpression in DCIS
is common and is associated with higher grade and
comedo necrosis; these pathologic features are associ-
ated with a higher risk of local recurrence.
Almost half of ER-negative DCIS lesions express
Her2/neu, and a majority of Her2/neu-positive DCIS
lesions are ER negative and there are few effect-
ive medical treatments for ER-negative DCIS...
About 12% of ER-positive DCIS cases overexpress Her2/neu,
and there is some concern that ER expression may pro-
vide some resistance to tamoxifen.

Also keep in mind:

--THERE ARE DCIS THAT NEVER DEVELOP INTO IDC--WITHOUT KNOWING HOW many of these THERE ARE, HOW DO WE KNOW WE ARE NOT MISSING A WHOLE LOT OF DATA FROM PEOPLE WHO NEVER HAVE MAMMOGRAMS WHICH COULD BE USED TO ALLAY THE CONCERNS OF THOSE WHO DO AND ARE FOUND TO HAVE DCIS ONLY (ie without invasive component)
AND WHO is TO ASSUME THAT MOST CASES OF DCIS that occur are even discovered--MANY women DIE PROBABLY DIE OF OTHER CAUSES WITHOUT EVER DISCOVERING the DCIS. THIS MAKES IT VERY HARD TO SAY HOW MANY DCIS ARE ER+,HER2+, EVENTUALLY INVADE ETC.

Just pointing this out as it is necessary that periodically those things that are "generally accepted" get questioned.
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 09:43 PM   #4
Jean
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,154
What if anything have you heard Lani....

of a trial of bone biopsey being performed on patients during lumpectomy.
I do know of a trial being done at Cornel NY, I was a bit annoyed at the time (2005) that I was not informed about it prior to my lumpectomy
as I would have been glad to participate in the trial since I fit the profile
small tumor, SNB, ....have not a heard about it in almost three years.

Happy New Year !
jean
__________________
Stage 1, Grade 1, 3/30/05
Lumpectomy 4/15/05 - 6MM IDC
Node Neg. (Sentinel node)
ER+ 90% / PR-, Her2+++ by FISH
Ki-67 40%
Arimidex 5/05
Radiation 32 trt, 5/30/05
Oncotype DX test 4/17/06, 31% high risk
TOPO 11 neg. 4/06
Stopped Arimidex 5/06
TCH 5/06, 6 treatments
Herceptin 5/06 - for 1 yr.
9/06 Completed chemo
Started Femara Sept. 2006
Jean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 07:21 AM   #5
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
As you may recall I have been wondering "outloud" for years

here, why more bone marrow biopsies are not done to stage breast cancer patients and determine their risk of recurrence (particularly as part of clinical trials)

Here is an article from MD Anderson recommending further studies.

{I remember several years ago UCSF was going to include bone marrow samples taken at the time of initial surgery in some trial of theirs, but have never seen any results published.

The results published are mostly out of Germany from the group headed by Braun. They have published a great deal on this topic.}


Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2007 Oct;7(10):1463-72. Links
Significance of micrometastasis in bone marrow and blood of operable breast cancer patients: research tool or clinical application?

Lang JE, Hall CS, Singh B, Lucci A.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Surgical Oncology, Unit 444, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA. jlang@surgery.arizona.edu
Approximately 25% of breast cancer patients without lymph node metastases develop systemic relapse. A growing body of data supports the notion that hematogenous dissemination of breast cancer cells occurs independently of lymphatic spread of disease; however, current clinical practice does not involve routine analysis of circulating or disseminated cells. Recent studies have documented that both circulating tumor cells (CTCs) within the blood and disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in bone marrow can be identified using a variety of techniques. It is now clear that the presence of DTCs correlates with subsequent development of clinically evident bone metastases, and a worse outcome from breast cancer. While there are data identifying prognostic significance of CTCs in patients with metastatic breast cancer, there are few data regarding CTCs in operable patients. Factors such as presence of a cancer stem cell phenotype and/or certain microenvironmental conditions are involved in the establishment of distant metastases from a primary breast cancer, emphasizing the need for further studies within this area. The purpose of this report is to review the data regarding CTCs and DTCs in patients with operable breast cancer.
PMID: 17944570 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Related Links
Detection and clinical implications of early systemic tumor cell dissemination in breast cancer.
[Clin Cancer Res. 2003]
Micrometastatic breast cancer cells in bone marrow at primary surgery: prognostic value in comparison with nodal status.
[J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996]
Current status in human breast cancer micrometastasis.
[Curr Opin Oncol. 2007]
Clinical significance of immunocytochemical detection of tumor cells using digital microscopy in peripheral blood and bone marrow of breast cancer patients.
[Clin Cancer Res. 2004]
[Micrometastatic cells in the bone marrow of patients with breast carcinoma]
[Radiologe. 2000]
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 07:23 AM   #6
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
The Braun/Pantel group

Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Dec 15;9(17):6326-34. Links
Detection and clinical implications of early systemic tumor cell dissemination in breast cancer.

Pantel K, Müller V, Auer M, Nusser N, Harbeck N, Braun S.
Institut für Tumorbiologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. pantel@uke.uni-hamburg.de
Blood-borne distant metastasis is the leading cause of cancer-related death in breast cancer. The onset of this fundamental process can now be assessed in cancer patients using ultrasensitive immunocytochemical and molecular assays able to detect even single metastatic cells. Analyses of bone marrow (BM) samples show that disseminated cells are present in 20-40% of primary breast cancer patients without any clinical or histopathological signs of metastasis. The common homing of circulating breast cancer cells in BM is indicative for systemic tumor cell spread and predictive for growth of overt metastases in relevant organ sites such as bone, lung, or liver. Recent clinical studies involving more than 3000 breast cancer patients demonstrated that the presence of tumor cells in BM at primary diagnosis is an independent prognostic factor for unfavorable clinical outcome. To date, sampling of BM, however, is not a routine procedure in clinical management of breast cancer patients. Therefore, several research groups have developed sensitive assays for detection of circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood. Studies evaluating the clinical relevance of these blood assays are ongoing. Here, we will review the existing tumor cell assays and discuss their current clinical relevance and perspectives for the clinical management of breast cancer patients.
PMID: 14695131 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 11:45 AM   #7
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
a news article covering the discovery that even DCIS cells can be motile

and spread the cancer
http://www.breastcancersource.com/br...10_0_0_0.aspx?
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter