HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-21-2007, 08:47 AM   #14
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,783
the real question is not if it is a bad agent

that with 25 years' use could cause another cancer vs. a source of estrogen-substitute in those with ER+ tumors who are taking AIs to try to starve their tumors of all estrogen (a substance that stimulates them to grow).

There was a report in Spring 2005 of a topical form of tamoxifen
--they showed how well it was absorbed. Since skin becomes dry, thinner, and less resilient after the menopause, whether natural or induced, due to lack of estrogen, many of the compounds put in cream to restore "youthfulness", moisture, etc may have estrogen-like ingredients.In this case, the ingredient is NOT there for that property. It is just a preservative,

I only suggest people think about IF their tumors are ER+ and if they are taking antihormonals, perhaps trying to find a cream which did not use parabens as a preservative might be a cautious (and perhaps prudent) move.
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter