HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > Articles of Interest
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-30-2006, 03:07 PM   #8
CLTann
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 476
I felt I was exhonorated (? spelling) in making the decision of not having chemo nor radiation as a stage I patient after reading the above thread. My onc advised to take chemo but went along with my decision. Being a pharmacist, I knew the toxicity of both chemo and radiation to the body. In my case, the gain in non-recurrence seemed to be too small in comparison to take the known and certain dangerous risks. The school of thought that the more aggressive the treatment would result in a better protocol should be rationally and carefully questioned.

I do my utmost in getting supplement food intakes that could help my cause. I believe in omega 3 balance, curcumine, ganoderma mushroom, flaxseed, balanced nutrients and exercise. No one knows whether my decision is the best choice but so far I felt that I did the right thing.
__________________
Ann

Stage 1 dx Sept 05
ER/PR positive HER2 +++ Grade 3
Invasive carcinoma 1 cm, no node involvement
Mastec Sept 05
Annual scans all negative, Oct 06
Postmenopause. Arimidex only since Sept 06, bone or muscle ache after 3 month
Off Arimidex, change to Femara 1/12-07, ache stopped
Sept 07 all tests negative, pass 2 year mark
Feb 08 continue doing well.
Sep 09 four year NED still on Femara.
CLTann is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter