HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-26-2006, 12:00 PM   #1
Dianaq
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Riverside, Ca.
Posts: 27
Jean,
Is the onco score on the pathlogy report?
Dianaq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2006, 12:41 PM   #2
Jean
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,154
Dianaq,

The Oncotype DX test is a test on the tissue of your tumor that was removed.
You have a tissue sample via slide sent to genomic health in Calif. They do the test is cost $3,400 this was covered by my insurance company.

here is the link www.genomichealth.com

What is found on your path report is your KI-67 level, mine was high 40%
Dr. Slamon believes this is a very important feature. He felt since mine was so
high I did not even need the Oncotype test with KI-67 levels that high.

I am still glad I did the test to confirm my status.

Hope this helps if you need any other info just reach out to me.

Good Luck
Jean
Jean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2006, 07:52 PM   #3
Dianaq
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Riverside, Ca.
Posts: 27
Susan,
I just read a study that said, chemo was more of a benefit for her2- patients. It also stated that for women with her2+, node neg. pre-men. that herceptin along with ovarian ablation and not chemo works better or as well as patients with her2- and chem. I am going to ask my ong. about this.
Dianaq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2006, 09:55 PM   #4
BEVIE
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 13
Hi Susan and triple positive ladies,
I was ER+ PR+ HER2++ postive tumor was 1 1/2 cm nod. negative dx almost 6yrs ago and still NED. I had a lumectomy and 2 cmf chemos before HER2 results were in and then my Onc switched me to 4 A/C chemo's and 28 rad. I took Tamoxifen for 9 months and then swithced to Arimidex just under 4 yrs. I have had a few scares which that weren't anything and a PET scan done in June that was clear. I too wonder if triple positive node neg. have less chance for recurrence or maybe it was the chemo and Arimidex? I am glad that I did the chemo I was 49 at the time and for me the peace of mind out weighs the side effects.
But if they would of had the Oncotype DX test 6 yrs ago I would had it.
My Best To You,
Bevie
BEVIE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 04:05 PM   #5
SusanV
Senior Member
 
SusanV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 188
visit to the onc tomorrow

Hi Everybody,


My FIRST visit with the Onc tomorrow morning at 10:15 am.... wish me luck. Thanks to your posts, I am going to ask questions about my path report, and also ask about the oncotype test. I will also ask some questions about chemo and her 2 - and chemo and her 2+. I will be back to post with all the news and information that I receive.

My husband, my parents and my brother are all coming with me tomorrow, and I am sure glad about that! 5 heads will be better than 1. At the moment, I would like to get as aggressive as possible with the treatment. Hopefully the onc will agree. I haven't met him yet, so I am not sure what type of doc he is.

Have a good day guys

Love to All

Susan V
SusanV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 05:39 PM   #6
panicked911
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 115
Hi Susan:

Like you, I am a triple positive, node negative w/ wide clear margins - stage 1. I was diagnoised almost a year ago and am being treated at alarge NY cancer center. Here is what my onc told me when I was going through the treatment decision making process:
My surgeon who i adore - ordered the oncotype test and it came back n th high range. When the oncologist saw it she said for Her 2 positive women it is a waste of money because to much emphasis in the score is placed on HER2 status and with us triple positives the results are "skewed" - you were lucky that your isurance compnay is paying for it - i am still battling with mine over the $3,400 bill. The compnay will go to bat with the appeals but so far I am on round three and it ain't looking good. Knowing what I know now, I am sorry i did it.
As for the type of adjuvent treatment - alot of it depends upon how highly triple positive you are - i am considered "highly" positive ( er 80% and pr70% ) thus hormonal treatments are most likely to work. I started on tamoxifen ( i was 43 at diagnosis and now where near menapaus) and switched to arimidex which has a much higher success rate with someone like me. To take arimidex I decided to shut down my ovaries with lupron injections ( monthly) at some point when all of the data is in I willrpobably remive my ovaries - for now enough surgery - I have the onc check my hornobal levels regularly and so far so good. I am also one of the minority here who is doing a year of herceptain w/out chemo - After much debate and enormous amount of research - and reliance on my oncologist who was running the herceptain trials from the very start, this was the best option - The one thig i will tell you is that it is important to do weekly herceptain while doing radiation - which is a must with a lumpectomy. I am now doing herceptain every three weeks and will be done with all of this by Thanksgiving. After tomorrow- only three more left. My treatment regimine is considered very aggressive by all standards. The one thing I have also learned is that where the screening is done (MRI's mamos, sonos) is as important as the treatment. Mine was caught on a fluke and totally missed by my regional hospital.I really good treatmnt center will be able to tell is something is amiss dense breasts or not.
I begged my surgeon to "take them off" she calmy worked with me for over a week to see that it wasn't necessary and there was no medical benefit in doing so.
Hope this helps and good luck,
Susanne
panicked911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2006, 07:46 PM   #7
Dianaq
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Riverside, Ca.
Posts: 27
You might also want to ask your ocg. if you are pre-men about taking Heceptin and an ovarian ablation verses Chemo and Herceptin.
Dianaq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2006, 06:28 PM   #8
SusanV
Senior Member
 
SusanV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 188
Hey everybody,


Back from the onc visit...Here's the update. I am going to have my first chemo treatment on Tuesday, Sept 5th at 12:45 pm. I feel good about this treatment route. Next will be herceptin and tomoxofin. Inquired about the oncotype test, and was given the same info that Panicked 911 posted in her thread. Based on the her 2 + and the ER+ PR+ the test results will be "skewed", and show a "High" range result no matter what. The outcome of this test would not change my choice for treatment, and therefore would not benefit me personally. My next big decision will be made after the results of genetic testing which I will have done on Sept 25th. The results will take 28 days to get, but if I do posess the gene, I will likely opt for the mastecomy as well as removal of my ovaries. Have any of you all had the genetic testing done? Just wondering??? I also stopped at a salon and made an appointment to look at wigs tomorrow. OH BOY !! I do have long hair, and plan to donate it to locks for love. I am going to find that phone number tomorrow, unless one of you happens to have a 1-800 number. Tomorrow morning I am going to have my first MUGA test...and some blood work. Thanks for all the help & info

Love to all of you

Susan V
SusanV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2006, 06:44 AM   #9
Hopeful
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,380
Earlier in the thread, Dianaq posted:

>>I just read a study that said, chemo was more of a benefit for her2- patients. It also stated that for women with her2+, node neg. pre-men. that herceptin along with ovarian ablation and not chemo works better or as well as patients with her2- and chem.<<

Dianaq, can you provide any information about how to find this study? I would very much like to read it.

Thanks,

Hopeful
Hopeful is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2006, 07:24 PM   #10
sadie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 98
I opted for the aggressive treatment also.
AC x4; Taxol w/Herceptin x12weeks; Herceptin 1 year total; 30 rads; Started Arimidex after rads.
My onc told me I was borderline for getting chemo (1cm); She said she would recommend the same treatment to her sister or mother.
She told me that although all the cancer was gotten out with the lumpectomy, there is that very small chance that 1 little cell "got away" thru the bloodstream.
She said the chemo would take care of that.
She now tells me I can expect to live a long and healthy life!
__________________
Dx Oct 2005 IDC
Lumpectomy
1cm / Stage 1 / grade 3
Sentinel node neg
Her2+++
ER+ / PR weakly+
sadie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2006, 07:59 PM   #11
Dianaq
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Riverside, Ca.
Posts: 27
Hopeful,
I found this info on WWW.healthcentral.com.
I am thinking seriously about this
Dianaq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2006, 08:05 PM   #12
Dianaq
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Riverside, Ca.
Posts: 27
HOPEFUL,
My gut feeling is not to have chemo. It has already been stated the chemo has no extra benefit for postmen. women that are her2+ because they no longer produce the excess estrogen. I think my ong. suggest chemo because it will put me into menopause and stop the estrogen. But if I can stop it with ovarian ablation and get the same results, why would I want to go through Chemo?
Dianaq is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter