Isn't this a little contradictory?
I looked up this for VIVO on her question for one year of herceptin use. Started reading the article and here they say....
Dr. Piccart-Gebhart’s report was one of 2 studies featured in this issue of NEJM highlighting the therapeutic benefit of trastuzumab in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. In the second article, a joint analysis of 2 phase 3 trials conducted by Dr. Edward Romond and colleagues, showed that trastuzumab significantly improved disease-free survival, reduced risk of death by one third, and reduced the rate of recurrence by approximately one half in women with HER2-positive breast cancer.2
Then in another paragraph, same aricle this is stated:
There was no difference in overall survival between women on the trastuzumab arm versus the observation arm (96.0%, [95% CI, 94% to 98%] vs 95.1% [95% CI, 93% to 97%], respectively (hazard ratio 0.76 [95% CI, 0.47-1.23]; P = .26).
I know I must be missing something, but I can't figure out what it is, can someone help me? Thank you.
__________________
Take care, k
DX: 10/29/03-Stage IIB, 3/12 nodes +, er/pr-,
Grade 3
MRM: 11/07/03
TX: TCH-BRICG Study-6 tx's; 12/15/03
Herceptin; til 12/14/04
Rads: 30 days
BRCA neg
S-Gap: 12/15/04
Oct 05: LAVH
NED
|