HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-26-2006, 07:06 AM   #1
kristen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 202
Question Isn't this a little contradictory?

I looked up this for VIVO on her question for one year of herceptin use. Started reading the article and here they say....
Dr. Piccart-Gebhart’s report was one of 2 studies featured in this issue of NEJM highlighting the therapeutic benefit of trastuzumab in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. In the second article, a joint analysis of 2 phase 3 trials conducted by Dr. Edward Romond and colleagues, showed that trastuzumab significantly improved disease-free survival, reduced risk of death by one third, and reduced the rate of recurrence by approximately one half in women with HER2-positive breast cancer.2

Then in another paragraph, same aricle this is stated:
There was no difference in overall survival between women on the trastuzumab arm versus the observation arm (96.0%, [95% CI, 94% to 98%] vs 95.1% [95% CI, 93% to 97%], respectively (hazard ratio 0.76 [95% CI, 0.47-1.23]; P = .26).

I know I must be missing something, but I can't figure out what it is, can someone help me? Thank you.
__________________
Take care, k
DX: 10/29/03-Stage IIB, 3/12 nodes +, er/pr-,
Grade 3
MRM: 11/07/03
TX: TCH-BRICG Study-6 tx's; 12/15/03
Herceptin; til 12/14/04
Rads: 30 days
BRCA neg
S-Gap: 12/15/04
Oct 05: LAVH
NED
kristen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2006, 07:39 AM   #2
JohnL
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: London, England
Posts: 24
Probably refers to the outcome of a specific study - possibly not a very recent one. Not so many years ago studies on Herceptin recruited patients with late stage disease. Whilst Herceptin often slowed the progress significantly and extended survival time, it only delayed the final outcome.

Later studies recruited people at progressively earlier and earlier stages when the effect was magnified to the point where its ability to stop recurrence effectively gave a measurable survival benefit - at least over the timescales of the study. Many recent studies like HERA which are reporting data after only a year or two of treatment qualify their results by pointing out that the percentage survival/recurrence benefit after 5 or 10 years may not be the same as is being measured over 2.

Most Onc's with extended experiece of using herceptin don't seem to be expecting this - though the occassional pessimist leaps up in the medical press to remind everyone that only time will tell.
JohnL is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter