(began as lung cancer tx, multitargeted antifolate, w/folic acid & B12, w/Gem, w/Cis, w/Cyclo, as maintenance)
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Feb;126(1):101-8. Epub 2010 Dec 25. Results of a phase II study of pemetrexed as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer.
Palliation is the primary goal in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and safe, efficacious, new single-agent options are needed. Pemetrexed, an antifolate, inhibits several folate-dependent enzymes involved in purine biosynthesis. The primary goal of this study was to determine the objective response rate in patients with advanced or MBC given pemetrexed as a first-line, dose-dense, every 2-week chemotherapy. Women with HER2-negative advanced or MBC, without prior cytotoxic treatment for this stage of disease, were treated with intravenous pemetrexed 600 mg/m² on Day 1 of each 14-day cycle. Standard dexamethasone, folic acid, and vitamin B(12) premedications were given. 37 patients enrolled; 36 received ≥ 1 dose of pemetrexed and 35 were evaluable for response. Median age of patients was 61.4 years, 76% were hormone receptor positive (ER+ and/or PR+). Prior treatment included adjuvant chemotherapy (57%) and/or endocrine (65%). Patients received a median of 6 cycles of pemetrexed (range, 1-21). Based on 35 evaluable patients, the overall response rate (ORR) was 26% (1 CR and 8 PR), and the clinical benefit rate (CR+ PR+ stable disease [SD] ≥ 6 months) was 40%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.1 months (range, <1-22.4). Median overall survival (OS) was 18.9 months (range, <1-27.7). Grades 3-4 treatment-related toxicities included: neutropenia (36%), leukopenia (17%), fatigue (14%), and anemia (14%). Grade 1/2 alopecia was seen in 8% of patients. This phase II study of dose-dense, single-agent pemetrexed showed moderate activity in the first-line setting with acceptable toxicity and no significant alopecia.
PMID:
21188632
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 May 1;13(9):2675-83. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of pemetrexed with high-dose folic acid supplementation or multivitamin supplementation in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer.
Takimoto CH, Hammond-Thelin LA, Latz JE, Forero L, Beeram M, Forouzesh B, de Bono J, Tolcher AW, Patnaik A, Monroe P, Wood L, Schneck KB, Clark R, Rowinsky EK.
Institute for Drug Development at the Cancer Therapy and Research Center and University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas 78245-3217, USA. ctakimot@idd.org
PURPOSE: This phase I study evaluated the effect of folate supplementation on the toxicity, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer. It also examined two different types of vitamin supplementation and whether the extent of prior myelosuppressive therapy affected pemetrexed tolerability. Patients and Methods: Patients received a 10-min infusion of 600 to 14,00 mg/m(2) pemetrexed every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified into cohorts by pretreatment status [lightly pretreated (LPT) or heavily pretreated (HPT)] and were supplemented with intermittent high-dose folic acid (HDFA) or with continuous daily multivitamins (MVI) containing nutritional doses of folic acid. Pemetrexed plasma pharmacokinetics were evaluated for cycle 1. RESULTS: Sixty-two HDFA patients (28 HPT and 34 LPT) were treated with 204 cycles of pemetrexed, and 43 MVI patients (20 HPT and 23 LPT) were treated with 182 cycles. Hematologic dose-limiting toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia (5 of 105 patients), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (4 of 105 patients), and febrile neutropenia (3 of 105 patients). Nonhematologic toxicities included fatigue, vomiting, diarrhea, and nausea. Pemetrexed doses of 800 and 1,050 mg/m(2) were well tolerated when administered with vitamin supplementation to HPT and LPT patients, respectively. There were no clinically relevant differences in toxicities or pemetrexed pharmacokinetics for LPT versus HPT patients or for patients receiving HDFA versus daily MVI supplementation. CONCLUSIONS: The pemetrexed doses tolerated in this study with vitamin supplementation were significantly higher than those tolerated in earlier studies without supplementation, and toxicities were independent of the type of vitamin supplementation or prior myelosuppressive treatment. The recommended dose of pemetrexed is 1,050 mg/m(2) in LPT patients and 800 mg/m(2) in HPT patients, irrespective of the type of vitamin supplementation.
PMID: 17473199 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Dec 1;12(23):7071-8. A phase I study of pemetrexed (ALIMTA) and cyclophosphamide in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.
Dittrich C, Petruzelka L, Vodvarka P, Gneist M, Janku F, Kysela T, Melemed A, Latz J, Simms L, Krejcy K.
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Applied Cancer Research and Applied Cancer Research-Institution for Translational Research Vienna, Kaiser Franz Josef-Spital, Austria. ch.dittrich@chello.at
PURPOSE: Determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of pemetrexed and cyclophosphamide combination therapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer and WHO performance status 0 to 2 were eligible. Pemetrexed (range, 400-2,400 mg/m(2)) was administered on day 1 of a 21-day schedule followed by cyclophosphamide (range, 400-800 mg/m(2)). Folic acid and vitamin B(12) supplementation began 1 to 2 weeks before the first pemetrexed dose. RESULTS: Fifty-seven pretreated patients were enrolled and received 342 cycles (median, 4 cycles; range, 1-26) through 14 dose levels. The MTD of pemetrexed was 2,400 mg/m(2) (combined with cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m(2)) with dose-limiting toxicities of grade 4 neutropenia with grade 4 infection and grade 3 diarrhea. Other grade 3 or 4 toxicities included (febrile) neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, elevated alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase, and diarrhea. Pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that pemetrexed clearance and central volume of distribution were 40% lower than single-agent reference data, yielding a 68% increase in total systemic exposure and a 56% increase in maximal plasma concentration. Among the 50 patients evaluable for efficacy, 13 (26%) patients had a partial response and 17 (34%) patients had stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed was generally well tolerated. The observed toxicities were consistent with the known toxicity profiles of pemetrexed and cyclophosphamide. Considering the MTD and the toxicity and efficacy results in this and prior studies, a low (600 mg/m(2)) and a high (1,800 mg/m(2)) dose of pemetrexed with cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m(2)) will be evaluated in the consecutive prospective randomized phase II study.
PMID: 17145830 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Semin Oncol. 2006 Jun;33(3 Suppl 9):S24-8. Use of pemetrexed in breast cancer.
Dittrich C.
Applied Cancer Research -- Institution for Translational Research Vienna (ACR-ITR VIEnna), Vienna, Austria. christian.dittrich@wienkav.at
Pemetrexed, a new antifolate drug, has shown broad-spectrum activity in multiple tumor types. Single-agent activity against breast cancer in untreated patients reached 31% and, depending on the type and degree of prior chemotherapy, response rates tended to decrease stepwise from 28% in lightly pretreated patients (ie, with only adjuvant chemotherapy or at maximum one chemotherapy treatment for metastatic disease) to 8% in heavily pretreated patients after exposure with anthracyclines, taxanes, and capecitabine. No clear dose-response relationship could be established. The results from an ongoing prospective, randomized, double-blind phase II study of two different doses (600 mg/m(2) and 900 mg/m(2) of single-agent pemetrexed) may elucidate this further. In addition, analysis of specific gene profiles and clinical outcome with special emphasis on pathways known to be important for antifolate activity is ongoing. Combinations of pemetrexed with doxorubicin, epirubicin, or cyclophosphamide have also been evaluated in separate phase I/II trials. For the combination of pemetrexed with carboplatin or gemcitabine, dose recommendations from phase I trials that are not restricted to breast cancer have been used. The combination of pemetrexed with gemcitabine or carboplatin has shown remarkable activity. Further results on the use of a pemetrexed-plus-cyclophosphamide combination will be provided by an ongoing prospective, randomized phase II study.
PMID: 16797379 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Semin Oncol. 2006 Feb;33(1 Suppl 2):S15-8. Clinical experience with pemetrexed in breast cancer.
Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Feb 1;12(3 Pt 1):832-8. A phase II trial of pemetrexed in advanced breast cancer: clinical response and association with molecular target expression.
Gomez HL, Santillana SL, Vallejos CS, Velarde R, Sanchez J, Wang X, Bauer NL, Hockett RD, Chen VJ, Niyikiza C, Hanauske AR.
Instituto de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru. hgomez@inen.sld.pe
PURPOSE: This phase II trial of pemetrexed explored potential correlations between treatment outcome (antitumor activity) and molecular target expression. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Chemonaïve patients with advanced breast cancer received up to three cycles of pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (10-minute i.v. infusion) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle, with folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation. Tumors were surgically removed after the last cycle of pemetrexed as clinically indicated. Biopsies were taken at baseline, 24 hours after infusion in cycle 1, and after cycle 3. RESULTS: Sixty-one women (median age, 46 years; range, 32-72 years) were treated and were evaluable for response. Objective response rate was 31%. Simple logistic regression suggested a potential relationship between mRNA expression of thymidylate synthase (TS) and pemetrexed response (P = 0.103). Based on threshold analysis, patients with "low" baseline TS (< or = 71) were more likely to respond to pemetrexed than patients with "high" baseline TS (>71). Expression of baseline dihydrofolate reductase and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyl transferase tended to be higher in responders but this association was not significant (P > 0.311). TS expression increased significantly between baseline and biopsy 2 (P = 0.004) and dropped to near baseline levels at biopsy 3. Conversely, dihydrofolate reductase and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyl transferase decreased after pemetrexed chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a potential association between "low" pretreatment TS expression levels and response to pemetrexed chemotherapy. Future trials examining expression levels of other genes important to the folate pathway and/or breast cancer may identify a more robust multigene profile that can better predict response to this novel antifolate.
PMID: 16467096 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Clin Breast Cancer. 2006 Dec;7(5):380-5.Pemetrexed in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had received previous anthracycline and taxane treatment: phase II study.
Llombart-Cussac A, Theodoulou M, Rowland K, Clark RS, Nakamura T, Carrasco E, Cruciani G.
Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain. allombart@arnau.scs.es
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed in pretreated patients with advanced-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced-stage or metastatic breast cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, and progressive or relapsed disease after treatment with regimens containing anthracyclines and taxanes were eligible. Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 was administered as a 10-minute intravenous infusion on day 1 every 21 days. RESULTS: Seventy-nine women were enrolled. After protocol amendment, 43 patients received folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation to control pemetrexed-related toxicity. A median of 4 cycles (range, 1-23 cycles) was administered. Overall response rate was 9% (95% confidence interval, 3.7%-17.6%), median duration of response was 5.5 months, median progression-free survival was 3.1 months, and median survival was 10.5 months. Major grade 3/4 toxicities were lymphopenia (53.3%), neutropenia (36.4%), leukopenia (26.9%), and anemia (7.7%). In general, the toxicities were less frequent in patients who received vitamin supplementation than in those who did not receive vitamin supplementation. CONCLUSION: The response to pemetrexed salvage treatment was low in this study of heavily pretreated patients with breast cancer. Pemetrexed was generally well tolerated in patients with previously treated breast cancer. Vitamin supplementation appeared to ameliorate toxicity.
PMID: 17239262 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Clin Breast Cancer. 2005 Jun;6(2):143-9. Phase II study of pemetrexed in patients pretreated with an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine for advanced breast cancer.
O'Shaughnessy JA, Clark RS, Blum JL, Mennel RG, Snyder D, Ye Z, Liepa AM, Melemed AS, Yardley DA.
Texas Oncology, PA, USA. joyce.o'shaughnessy@usoncology.com
BACKGROUND: This phase II study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and health outcomes of pemetrexed treatment in heavily pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with metastatic breast cancer, Karnofsky performance status > or = 70, and previous treatment with > or = 3 regimens containing anthracyclines, taxanes, and capecitabine were eligible. Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 intravenous infusion was administered on day 1 of a 21-day treatment cycle. RESULTS: Eighty patients were enrolled, and 60 received concurrent folic acid and vitamin B12 supplements per protocol amendment to minimize possible pemetrexed-related toxicity. The median numbers of cycles delivered were 3 for vitamin-supplemented patients and 2 for non-vitamin-supplemented patients. Regardless of vitamin supplementation, the overall response rate was 8% (95% CI, 3%-16.6%), stable disease was exhibited in 36% of patients, median time to disease progression was 2.9 months, and median survival was 8.2 months. Improvements in patient-reported symptoms ranged from 16.2% for pain intensity to 32.1% for nausea. Major grade 3/4 toxicities were hematologic, with grade 4 neutropenia in 10% of patients and grade 3 toxicities consisting primarily of neutropenia (29%) and leukopenia (21%). There were no clear trends of the effect of supplementation on toxicity. CONCLUSION: Pemetrexed has modest antitumor activity and is well tolerated in heavily pretreated patients with breast cancer. Further evaluation of this multitargeted antifolate in advanced breast cancer is warranted.
PMID: 16001992 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Oncology (Williston Park). 2004 Nov;18(13 Suppl 8):63-5. Phase II studies of pemetrexed in metastatic breast and gynecologic cancers.
Smith I.
Medical Oncologist Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom. ian.smith@rmh.nthames.nhs.uk
Pemetrexed (Alimta) is active in a variety of solid tumors, including breast and gynecologic cancers. Phase II trials of pemetrexed at a dose of 600 mg/m2 without vitamin B12 and folic acid supplementation in largely pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients demonstrated objective response rates of 21% and 28%, with generally manageable neutropenia constituting the primary toxicity. In phase II trials using 500 mg/m2 with or without vitamin supplementation in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated patients, response rates were lower (approximately 9%) and treatment was generally well tolerated irrespective of vitamin supplementation status. A phase II trial is currently comparing pemetrexed doses of 600 and 900 mg/m2 with vitamin B12 supplementation in patients with previously untreated advanced breast cancer. In a phase II trial in patients with advanced cervical cancer, pemetrexed at 600 mg/m2 without vitamin supplementation and 500 mg/m2 with supplementation produced similar response rates, with the frequency of neutropenia being somewhat lower among patients receiving the lower dose and vitamin supplementation. Preliminary results in an ongoing phase II trial indicate activity of the regimen of gemcitabine (Gemzar) at 1,000 mg/m2 plus pemetrexed at 500 mg/m2 with vitamin supplementation in patients with ovarian cancer. Ongoing and future studies will establish optimal dosing regimens of pemetrexed and potential benefits of vitamin supplementation in the settings of metastatic breast cancer and gynecologic malignancies.
PMID: 15655940 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Ann Oncol. 2003 Aug;14(8):1246-52. Phase II study of pemetrexed in breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracyclines.
Martin M, Spielmann M, Namer M, duBois A, Unger C, Dodwell D, Vodvarka P, Lind M, Calvert H, Casado A, Zelek L, Lluch A, Carrasco E, Kayitalire L, Zielinski C.
Hospital Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain. mmartin@geicam.org
BACKGROUND: To assess antitumor activity and toxicity of pemetrexed in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients previously treated with anthracyclines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-seven MBC patients from 12 European institutions were entered into the study. Seventy-two patients were considered evaluable for response and toxicity. Forty-two patients were classified as anthracycline-failure (relapse >30 days after completion of a prior anthracycline regimen) and 30 as anthracycline-refractory (progression within 30 days after anthracycline therapy). Pemetrexed 600 mg/m(2) was administered intravenously every 3 weeks until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: There were three complete and 12 partial responders [response rate 21% (95% confidence interval 12%)]. Response rates in the anthracycline-failure and anthracycline-refractory groups were 24% and 17%, respectively. A subset of 31 patients pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes had a response rate of 26%. Median duration of response and median survival were 5.5 and 10.7 months, respectively (13 months in the failure group and 5.7 months for refractory). Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 56% and 19% of patients, respectively. Nine patients (12%) experienced neutropenic fever. Grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities included skin rash (10%), nausea (12%), fatigue (10%) and stomatitis (5%). CONCLUSION: Our trial demonstrates pemetrexed to be active in breast cancer, with manageable toxicity. Activity of pemetrexed did not appear to be adversely affected by prior taxane, 5-fluorouracil or endocrine treatments.
PMID: 12881387 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Jan 1;15(1):382-9. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of pemetrexed plus cisplatin in chemonaive patients with locally advanced or metastatic malignant pleural mesothelioma or non-small cell lung cancer.
Dickgreber NJ, Fink TH, Latz JE, Hossain AM, Musib LC, Thomas M.
Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. nicolas.dickgreber@gmx.de
PURPOSE: Pemetrexed is approved as monotherapy and in combination with cisplatin. The established combination dose was identified before the addition of folic acid and vitamin B(12) to the treatment regimen. We evaluated the toxicity and pharmacokinetics (PK) of higher pemetrexed doses with cisplatin and vitamin supplementation. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma or non-small cell lung cancer received pemetrexed doses from 500 to 900 mg/m(2) + 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin once every 21 days. Folic acid and vitamin B(12) were administered per label recommendations. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients received a combined total of 84 cycles. The maximum tolerated dose was 900 mg/m(2) pemetrexed + 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin. Dose-limiting toxicities at this dose included grade 3 anemia, bronchopneumonia, and neutropenia, and 1 death from sepsis secondary to grade 4 febrile neutropenia, considered possibly related to study drugs. The recommended dose was 800 mg/m(2) pemetrexed + 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin. Pemetrexed PK were consistent across doses; pemetrexed did not seem to affect total or free platinum PK. CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed with vitamin supplementation was safe and well tolerated at higher doses than the currently established 500 mg/m(2) + 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin. Based on this study, the recommended dose would be 800 mg/m(2) pemetrexed + 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin. However, recent studies showed a lack of improved efficacy for 900 or 1,000 mg/m(2) single-agent pemetrexed versus 500 mg/m(2) and a lack of PK/pharmacodynamic exposure-response relationship for the pemetrexed/cisplatin combination across pemetrexed exposures corresponding to this dose range. Based on currently available evidence, we recommend retaining the established dose.
PMID: 19118069 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Clin Ther. 2005 Sep;27(9):1343-82. Pemetrexed: a multitargeted antifolate.
Rollins KD, Lindley C.
Department of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7360, USA. Kristan_@unc.edu
BACKGROUND: The US Food and Drug Administration approved pemetrexed in February 2004 for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) in combination with cisplatin in patients with unresectable disease or for whom curative surgery is not an option. Pemetrexed is the first agent approved for the treatment of MPM. In August 2004, pemetrexed was approved as a second-line, single-agent treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). OBJECTIVES: The goals of this article were to summarize the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of pemetrexed, and to review its current and potential roles in therapy for MPM, NSCLC, and other oncologic conditions. METHODS: Relevant English-language literature was identified through searches of PubMed (1966-December 2004), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and the Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (January 1995-December 2004). Search terms included pemetrexed, Alimta, MTA, multitargeted antifolate, LY231514, mesothelioma, MPM, non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC, breast cancer, and pancreatic cancer. In addition to published literature, abstracts and posters presented at national and international scientific meetings were reviewed. RESULTS: Myelosuppression was the predominant dose-limiting toxicity of pemetrexed reported in Phase I studies. Identification of the correlation between poor folate status and increased pemetrexed toxicity in a multivariate analysis led to the requirement of folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation for patients in all pemetrexed studies, with a resulting noted decrease in pemetrexed toxicity. A single, multicenter, randomized Phase III trial compared the efficacy of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in the treatment of MPM. Response rates were 41.3% in the pemetrexed/cisplatin combination and 16.7% with single-agent cisplatin (P < 0.001). The median survival time for the pemetrexed/cisplatin combination was significantly longer at 12.1 months versus 9.3 months for cisplatin alone (P = 0.02). One international, multicenter, randomized Phase III trial in patients with NSCLC compared single-agent pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients previously treated with chemotherapy. Overall response rates (9.1% and 8.8%) and median survival (8.3 months and 7.9 months) did not differ between pemetrexed and docetaxel (P = 0.105 and P = 0.226, respectively). Hematologic adverse effects-grade 3/4 neutropenia (40.2% vs 5.3%; P < 0.001), febrile neutropenia (12.7% vs 1.9%; P < 0.001), and neutropenic infections (3.3% vs 0%; P = 0.004)-were significantly greater in the docetaxel-treated patients than in the pemetrexed-treated patients, as was alopecia (37.7% vs 6.4%; P < 0.001). Results of an international, multicenter Phase III trial of pemetrexed in combination with gemcitabine conducted in patients with pancreatic cancer indicate that the combination is no more efficacious than single-agent gemcitabine. Results in other disease states are still preliminary. CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed is a multitargeted antifolate that has demonstrated antitumor activity in various tumor types as a single agent and in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. Efficacy for the treatment of MPM in combination with cisplatin has been demonstrated, and approval as a second-line agent in NSCLC was based on response rate as a surrogate end point for survival. The addition of folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation markedly reduced.
PMID: 16291410 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Anticancer Res. 2007 Mar-Apr;27(2):825-33. Sequence-dependent administration of raloxifene and 5-fluorouracil/pemetrexed protects against pemetrexed cytotoxicity in human bone marrow.
Das JR, Fryar-Tita EB, Green S, Southerland WM, Bowen D.
Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Howard University, Washington, DC 20059, USA.
BACKGROUND: Pemetrexed (Alimta) is a new-generation multitargeted antifolate that inhibits several key enzymes in the de novo pathways of pyrimidine and purine biosynthesis, including thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase (GARFT). Alimta has demonstrated antitumor activity in a broad array of human malignancies, e.g. breast, non-small cell lung cancer, malignant pleural mesothelioma and pancreatic, colorectal, gastric, bladder, head and neck cancer, and is currently in phase III clinical trials. It has been reported that a dose of 600 mg/m2 of pemetrexed showed toxicity to bone marrow and the gastrointestinal system. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate raloxifene (RAL) in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/pemetrered multitargeted antifolate (MTA) to determine the most effective regimens and cellular mechanism of action to mitigate pemetrexed cytotoxicity in human bone marrow cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In order to determine the sequence-dependent interaction between MTA, 5-FU and RAL on proliferation, cell viability was carried out using the Quick Cell Proliferation Assay by exposing the HS-5 and MCF-7 cells to (i) MTA, 5-FU and RAL alone, or (ii) RAL 24 h prior to 5-FU followed 2 h later by MTA, or (iii) 5-FU 2 h prior to MTA followed 24 h later by RAL. RESULTS: The growth rate in MCF-7 in early RAL was 69 +/- 8.65% and late RAL was 36 +/- 4.6% of the control whereas in bone marrow early RAL was 78 +/- 8.65% and late RAL was 52 +/- 5.49% of the control. The late RAL exhibits significant protection against MTA cytotoxicity in bone marrow. The findings were further supported by cell flow cytometry, apoptosis and Western blot analysis data. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that sequence-dependent administration of RAL (5FU/MTA/RAL), in combination with 5-FU/MTA, protects against MTA toxicity in human bone marrow while maintaining the maximum inhibitory effect of pemetrexed in breast cancer.
PMID: 17465208 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Taking Chemo Drug Continuously Delayed Lung Cancer's Return
Study found 38% reduction in risk of recurrence in advanced cases
The results are preliminary, but Spanish scientists report that staying on Alimta (pemextrexed) delayed recurrence of the disease. "This is the first trial with what looks like a positive outcome where you continue the same treatment," said Dr. Neal Ready, a professor of medicine at the Duke Cancer Institute in Durham, N.C. "All the other positive trials in the past switched chemotherapy regimens, so this is a true 'maintenance' approach" in that doctors maintained the patients on the same drug.
Although overall survival data is not yet in, "if it all bears out and that looks good, this would influence medical oncologists to continue treatment after the standard combination of two chemotherapies at the same time," Ready said
Linear Mode
