HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-01-2006, 10:35 AM   #1
Julie2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 556
is getting scans a good idea?

It has been one and half year since my diagnosis and I didn't get any CT/PET scan after my chemo is over. I asked my oncologist to get a CT/PET fusion. She agreed to order one but she doesn't think it is a good idea. Her comments are "why do you want to disturb your mental peace when things are going alright whithout any physical symptoms. There is no difference in prognosis if mets are found earlier(except brain). There are lot of false positives and they increase the anxiety and cuase unnecessary stress."

I am not sure what to do. I am just returning to normal life and started working. Thinking of the scan itself is increasing my anxiety. I am going for a brain MRI but thinking whether to get CT/PET is a good idea.

Please share your experiences.

thanks,
Julie
__________________
Diagnosed in Sept 2004 while pregnant with the second child. Stage 3b, tumor 4.5cm, 4 auxillary and supraclav node positive. Her2+++ FISH 9.4 and er-,pr-.
Had dose dense neoadjuvant AC,Taxol then mastectomy,radiation+xeloda+Herceptin.
Julie2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 10:45 AM   #2
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
As far as I can see...

Your oncologists view that finding mets early makes no difference is probably based on statistics generated by ALL breast cancers that metastasize, not just her2neu+ breast cancers. Her2neu+ breast cancers behave differently (worse when not treated with herceptin) and their natural history--how long they take to recur, where and how often they metastasize seems to be altered by Herceptin so it seems NO ONE KNOWS.

Someone posted an interesting editorial by Dr. Hortobagyi of MD Anderson saying (even before Herceptin) he knew of a few patients with longer term survival who had only "minimal" mets and the question of whether to try to find mets earlier (and therefore smaller) should probably be readdressed. Hope I quoted this correctly. Wouldn't mind if someone reposted it.

Hope this helps!
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 09:39 AM   #3
Audrey
Senior Member
 
Audrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 212
Julie, I was in your same position a few years ago--my onc. did not recommend scans after my treatment for the same reasons you mentioned. For me, that was something I could agree with. I was SO anxious about getting scans and had a miserable experience undergoing a CAT scan after the initial diagnosis to check for mets--turns out I was allergic to the iodine constrast dye that they use and started breaking out in hives/freaking out in the CAT scan tube...I think I am really in the minority of people on this board who do NOT get regular scans, but as long as I am not having any symptoms, my onc and I feel that is okay. By the way, I was diagnosed in 2001 and am looking forward to 5 years of survival this summer! (Stage III, er/pr negative, Her2+, large tumor, many lymph nodes, treated with A/C, Taxol, rads, Herceptin)
Audrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 10:12 AM   #4
lexigirl
Senior Member
 
lexigirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Northern Calif.
Posts: 981
Julie,
My onc said the same thing. She said that unless I am having pains lasting for more than 2 weeks that they will not scan. She said that there was no reason to make yourself more anxious and that the tx would be the same whether mets are discovered earlier than later. They either respond to tx or they don't. I have a hard time with that too because I have pains all over!! Especially in my back and shoulders. I am trying to keep positive and not worry about all the aches. I don't think the Docs have any idea how we feel. They just don't get it.

Love and Prayers,
Lexi
lexigirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 03:22 PM   #5
margaret
Senior Member
 
margaret's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 49
Hi,

I was stage 3b with 16 positive nodes, and my onc said the same thing, that she didn't reccommend regular scans. I think it took me about 2 years but now I trust her and that decision. I choose to live in faith that I'm fine and I don't do any scans. I do blood tests every 6 months and it's been 4 and a half years.
Fear is a really debilitating emotion. I'm doing my best to stay out of fear in many aspects of my life. It works for me to have trust and faith. I don't take any medication either. I hardly ever even take an aspirin and I'm really grateful. I do try to keep a strong immune system by eating well (organic fruits, vegetables, whole grains, nuts and seeds) and I exercise alot and do yoga and meditation. This is what works for me.
Margaret
margaret is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 03:32 PM   #6
Cathya
Senior Member
 
Cathya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 752
Julie;

I just came home from a brain CT with contrast recommended by my onc. I didn't have any symptoms but he wanted a baseline. I am stage 3c because of a supraclavicular node 1 cm tumor. Following my chemo and radiation he had all of my tests redone.....chest x-ray, abdominal ultrasound, CT whatever and has just had this brain ct done and a bone density as he thinks I might need something for the bones. He has agreed to tumor marker tests for me and I am trying to get the Serum her2 into Canada right now. I didn't ask for these tests but did the tumor markers and I have a feeling that as long as I was being reasonable and logical he would agree to anything I wanted. PLUS, he's got a sense of humour....great onc!!

Cathy
Cathya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 06:47 PM   #7
Petesmom
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 49
I have never had any type of scan done and I have had two bouts of bc. My tumors were quite small and there was no nodal involvement. When I asked about getting a PET after my recurrence, the onc and the surgeon said no. Unless there are symptoms, they felt it was unecessary.

Again, who knows what is best? I am comfortable with the decision. My one year check up (mammogram on the only breast I still have) was clear.

Petesmom
Petesmom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2006, 05:32 AM   #8
kristen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 202
Dear Julie,

I applaud all these brave women before me who have posted. I was one of the people who had all the scans and I will tell you for a week prior and until you get the news, your okay, everything is clear, at least with me, I was a mess. I would wrap up in a cacoon type scenario and just pray everything would come out okay. I wanted the peace of mind that everything would be okay and it was. I did however have the brain MRI's which I am glad I got every 6 months. But as far as the rest, in hindsite, I don't know that I would do it again. This last time I went in for blood tests, I told them no, don't run the tumor markers. I felt better. My onc and the BRICG study I am to have a yearly mam and chest and that is good for me and every 6 months now I have blood work drawn.
So in answer to your question, there is +/- to both. You will have the peace of mind but getting there is a week of well for me, crazy and if not, you will learn to trust your body sooner and be at peace with yourself maybe? That is where I am at now, but it's been a long time coming. Good luck, it's each woman's individual quest to find what will work for her, and this was just my experience.
__________________
Take care, k
DX: 10/29/03-Stage IIB, 3/12 nodes +, er/pr-,
Grade 3
MRM: 11/07/03
TX: TCH-BRICG Study-6 tx's; 12/15/03
Herceptin; til 12/14/04
Rads: 30 days
BRCA neg
S-Gap: 12/15/04
Oct 05: LAVH
NED
kristen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2011, 02:49 PM   #9
Butters Stotch :)
Member
 
Butters Stotch :)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Russia
Posts: 24
Re: is getting scans a good idea?

Bumping up because times and meanings are changing.
__________________
Determination keeps me alive (c)
Now take a course of taxol and doxorubicin.
Her2 +++.
Butters Stotch :) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2011, 04:27 PM   #10
tricia keegan
Senior Member
 
tricia keegan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 3,463
Re: is getting scans a good idea?

Same here, my onc only likes to do scans with physical symptoms present or pain. I only request one now when really concerned after a month or so with symptoms and feel I had too many in the past due to my own hysterical emotions!!!!
I stay vigilant but don't request them quite so often, and usually the pain or symptom does go after a week or so!
__________________
Tricia
Dx July '05 IDC 1.9cm Triple positive 3/9 nodes positive
A/C X 4 ..Taxol/Herceptin x 12 wks then herceptin 1 yr
Rads x 36 ..oophorectomy August '06
Currently taking Arimidex..
June 2011 osteopenia/ zometa x1 yearly- stopped Zometa 2015 as Dexa show normal bone density.
Stopped Arimidex July 2014- Restarted Arimidex 2015 for a further two years on the advice of my Onc.
2014 Normal Dexa scan
2018 Mammo all clear, still NED!
tricia keegan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2011, 11:04 AM   #11
caya
Senior Member
 
caya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Thornhill, Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,320
Re: is getting scans a good idea?

I get a breast MRI and digial mammo - 1 x per year each, 6 months apart- onc. orders these.
I also get a vaginal/pelvic ultrasound 1x/year - this is ordered by my GP or ob/gyn - I ask for it, they order it.

Bloodwork 2 or 3x/year - GP orders this.

I get a bone density about every 18 months - ordered by GP.

That's it, unless I have symptoms - once had a 6 day headache just after finishing chemo, had a brain CT. All clear.

Otherwise, nada. I think that is the standard of care in Ontario Canada for stage 1 BC survivors.

all the best
caya
__________________
ER90%+/PR 50%+/HER 2+
1.7 cm and 1.0 cm.
Stage 1, grade 2, Node Negative (16 nodes tested)
MRM Dec.18/06
3 x FEC, 3 x Taxotere
Herceptin - every 3 weeks for a year, finished May 8/08

Tamoxifen - 2 1/2 years
Femara - Jan. 1, 2010 - July 18, 2012
BRCA1/BRCA2 Negative
Dignosed 10/16/06, age 48 , premenopausal
Mild lymphedema diagnosed June 2009 - breast surgeon and lymph. therapist think it's completely reversible - hope so.
Reclast infusion January 2012
Oopherectomy October 2013
15 Years NED!!
caya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2011, 11:16 AM   #12
adelay
Senior Member
 
adelay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mechanicsburg, OH
Posts: 109
Re: is getting scans a good idea?

I get mammos (one side only) and paps (yearly check up things) one a year and blood work every 3 months but scans only if physical symptoms are present. Sometimes I wish my onc. did them more often but then again it would probably just cause undo worry and stress. Every Dr. seems to approach this differently, we need to do what is right for each of us and our peace of mind.
__________________
~Anna

DX April 2009 age 40
IDC Triple Positive
7 of 14 nodes positive
Lumpectomy May 2009
Port May 2009
AC done in Sept 2009
T done Dec. 2009
Herceptin (should finish Oct. 2010)
Mastectomy January 2010
Radiaition x 33 done April 2010
Tamoxafin for five years
Herceptin done!
Still clear May 2011
3 years out May 2012, all good!
adelay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2011, 04:50 PM   #13
Sherryg683
Senior Member
 
Sherryg683's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,014
Re: is getting scans a good idea?

This has been debated many times and I still say the same. I had no physical symptoms at all when I was diagnosed stage IV with lung mets. Had I waited till there were symptoms, i might have been dead. John Hopkins posted on their website that cases where mets were small in number were easier treated than those where there were many mets. Makes sense, especially in brain mets where number and size mean alot. Being stage IV, I choose to have scans done to make sure that if something does pop up, I will treat it promptly. I will not wait for symptoms that may not develop until it's too late. If I were early stage cancer, I'd have a different approach..
__________________
Sherry

Diagnosed: December , 2005 at age 44
13+ positive lymph nodes
Stage IV , Her2+, 2 small mets to lungsChemo Started: Jan, 2006
4 months Taxotere, Xeloda, Hercepin
NED since April 2006!!
36 Rads to follow with weekly Herceptin indefinately
8 years NED now
Scans every year

Life is not about avoiding the thunderstorms, it's about learning to dance in the rain!
Sherryg683 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2011, 06:01 PM   #14
Jackie07
Senior Member
 
Jackie07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: "Love never fails."
Posts: 5,808
Re: is getting scans a good idea?

I just had another MRI because one of the Central Neurocytomas was causing some weird symptoms (I think it presses on my nose and causes watery nose.) Tomorrow I will see the radiation oncologist and get the result and her recommendation.

Before requesting for the MRI through neurosurgery, I had made an appointment with my oncologist because I thought all the discomfort I was feeling had to be caused by breast cancer.

Dr. Ruud carefully listened to me and checked me over. He commended me of being cautious and scheduled a 10-week follow-up.

I almost felt like to cancel the appointment because now I know the problems were caused by the brain tumor. But then again, it won't hurt to get regular physical exams.

All my doctors seem to be following the same guideline - only run scans when there're symptoms/complaints. I think they trust the blood tests more.
__________________
Jackie07
http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2011/06/doctors-letter-patient-newly-diagnosed-cancer.html
http://www.asco.org/ASCOv2/MultiMedi...=114&trackID=2

NICU 4.4 LB
Erythema Nodosum 85
Life-long Central Neurocytoma 4x5x6.5 cm 23 hrs 62090 semi-coma 10 d PT OT ST 30 d
3 Infertility tmts 99 > 3 u. fibroids > Pills
CN 3 GKRS 52301
IDC 1.2 cm Her2 +++ ER 5% R. Lmptmy SLNB+1 71703 6 FEC 33 R Tamoxifen
Recc IIB 2.5 cm Bi-L Mast 61407 2/9 nds PET
6 TCH Cellulitis - Lymphedema - compression sleeve & glove
H w x 4 MUGA 51 D, J 49 M
Diastasis recti
Tamoxifen B. scan
Irrtbl bowel 1'09
Colonoscopy 313
BRCA1 V1247I
hptc hemangioma
Vertigo
GI - > yogurt
hysterectomy/oophorectomy 011410
Exemestane 25 mg tab 102912 ~ 101016 stopped due to r. hip/l.thigh pain after long walk
DEXA 1/13
1-2016 lesions in liver largest 9mm & 1.3 cm onco. says not cancer.
3-11 Appendectomy - visually O.K., a lot of puss. Final path result - not cancer.
Start Vitamin D3 and Calcium supplement (600mg x2)
10-10 Stopped Exemestane due to r. hip/l.thigh pain OKed by Onco 11-08-2016
7-23-2018 9 mm groundglass nodule within the right lower lobe with indolent behavior. Due to possible adenocarcinoma, Recommend annual surveilence.
7-10-2019 CT to check lung nodule.
1-10-2020 8mm stable nodule on R Lung, two 6mm new ones on L Lung, a possible lymph node involvement in inter fissule.
"I WANT TO BE AN OUTRAGEOUS OLD WOMAN WHO NEVER GETS CALLED AN OLD LADY. I WANT TO GET SHARP EDGED & EARTH COLORED, TILL I FADE AWAY FROM PURE JOY." Irene from Tampa

Advocacy is a passion .. not a pastime - Joe
Jackie07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2011, 01:00 AM   #15
harrie
Senior Member
 
harrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hilo, Hawaii
Posts: 1,867
Re: is getting scans a good idea?

Unless there is a particular reason to utilize the use of scans for evaluation, I think maybe it is best to avoid the radiation. If a person needs it for peace of mind, then maybe it is warrented.
__________________
*** MARYANNE *** aka HARRIECANARIE

1993: right side DCIS, lumpectomy, rads
1999: left side DCIS, lumpectomy, rads, tamoxifen

2006:
BRCA 2 positive
Stage I, invasive DCIS (6mm x 5mm)
Grade: intermediate
sentinal node biopsy: neg
HER2/neu amplified 4.7
ER+/PR+
TOPO II neg
Oncotype dx 20
Bilat mastectomy with DIEP flap reconstruction
oophorectomy

2007:
6 cycles TCH (taxotere, carboplatin, herceptin)
finished 1 yr herceptin 05/07
Arimidex, stopped after almost 1 yr
Femara
harrie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2011, 03:44 AM   #16
Ellie F
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,526
Re: is getting scans a good idea?

Hi
I agree with Sherry.There seems to be some discrepancy with regard to stage 4. My own onc and some others believe that the smaller the mets the easier to treat, the better the outcome!!
I don't know if this is validated by any research but the theory at least seems sound!
Ellie
Ellie F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2011, 01:24 PM   #17
1rarebird
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: TN
Posts: 175
Re: is getting scans a good idea?

I have had 2 PET/CT scans now. I would have been more of a mental wreck if I had not had the 2nd one done. The first PET before chemo and Herceptin showed a few glucose avid "hot spots" in places which the doctors didn't like and therefore the 2nd PET was done after treatments were finished. Luckily none of the spots got any larger and no new ones were found. But none went away either including the ones in my thyroid. This gave more ammunition (my thyroid had other problems too) for the doctors to convince me to get it removed.

I'll state that looking at your PET/CT scan images can be uncomfortable because those bright spots where the glucose avid tissues reside are not fun to look at. But I am glad these base-line scans were done. I hope we'll never have to pull them out to compare to others later down the road.---bird
__________________
Male Breast Cancer, DX 5/15/09, IDC, STAGE 1, 1.7 cm, HER2+++, ER+(95%)/PR+(75%), Ki67 40%, grade 3, 0/5 nodes, TX: mastectomy, TCH finished 7/19/10, radiation 6 wks., Tamoxifen on going, bisphosphonate 24 mos.
1rarebird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2011, 01:31 PM   #18
NanaJoni
Senior Member
 
NanaJoni's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Elizabethton, TN
Posts: 418
Re: is getting scans a good idea?

I didn't have any scans prior to treatment but I didn't have my oncologist involved until after I had the bi-lateral mx. At my last Herceptin appt., we talked about the end of my treatments in May. He said he'll do a baseline PET scan and then get my port taken out. This is my first experience with a PET scan (I've had several CT scans of chest area with pulmonary emboli) but I'm not too worried about it either way. I understand that some docs prefer to have baseline tests for future comparison and that's fine with me.
__________________
Joni -64 yrs old -
3/01/10: found lump in rt.breast
3/12/10: mammogram/ultrasnd/biopsy-invasive bc & DCIS; 2 tumors (2cm er-/pr-/HER2-& 1.8 cm er-/pr-/HER2+); grade 3;poorly differentiated
3/24/10:sent.node biopsy clear
3/31/10:bi-lateral mx.;atypical ductal hyperplasia-lft side
4/21/10:wound revision-infection/scarring 4/28/10:seromas both sides
5/21/10:port installed,TCH chemo (6 x 3 wks); Herc,-1yr; 33 rad tx after chemo
07/2010: port not working-2nd port didnt'work;3rd port opposite side.
07/2010: 2 weeks after 3rd port surgery, threw 3 pulm. emboli-IVC filter installed; warfarin
08/2010: hospitalizations w/3 of chemos; decision to stop after 4th-on to radiation in Oct 2010;Herc cont.
12/03/2010 - finished 33 rads Hooray!! cont. Herc. every 3 wks
4/2011 - pneumonia ??? Nope-radiation pneumonitis. No more Herc.
5/2011 - NED!!! port out.
8/2011 - clean PET & CT scans.Still NED
7/2012 - Still NED/very blessed.
2/2013 - 6 mos checkup-all clear. CA2729 down frm 13 to 11.
NanaJoni is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter