HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-18-2011, 09:29 AM   #1
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
drugs already approved indirectly attack breast cancer stem cells (responsible for bc

growth and spread).
I heard much about this at last year's AACR annual conference in Washington, DC in APril

Now it has been published(and via open access):


U-M researchers find indirect path to attack breast cancer stem cells
[University of Michigan Health System]
ANN ARBOR, Mich. — Scientists at the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center have identified a potential new way of attacking breast cancer stem cells, the small number of cells in a tumor that fuel its growth and spread. Researchers found that breast cancer stem cells are regulated by a type of cell derived from bone marrow, called mesenchymal stem cells. These cells are drawn from the bone marrow to the cancer and create a "niche" for the cancer stem cells, allowing them to replicate.

"The importance of this is that we may be able to attack breast cancer stem cells indirectly by blocking these signals from the niche," says study author Max S. Wicha, M.D., Distinguished Professor of Oncology and director of the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Breast cancer stem cells were first identified by Wicha and colleagues at the University of Michigan in 2003. Cancer stem cells are believed to be resistant to current chemotherapies and radiation treatment, which researchers say may be the reason cancer so often returns after treatment.

Little is known about the cancer stem cell niche - a type of microenvironment that is highly associated with tumor growth and metastasis. The researchers looked at mesenchymal stem cells, which arise in bone marrow. They found that breast cancers in mice sent out signals which attracted mesenchymal stem cells from the bone marrow into the tumor where these cells interacted and stimulated the growth of breast cancer stem cells.

Researchers then identified two signals from a cytokine network - a type of protein that affects how cells communicate - that were responsible for stem cell regulation. These same cytokines play a role in inflammation and drugs that block them have already been approved for the treatment of inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. By blocking these cytokine signals, researchers hope that they can successfully target the cancer stem cell population providing a more effective treatment for breast cancer.

Results: of the study appear in the Jan. 15 issue of Cancer Research.

Additional authors: From U-M: Suling Liu, Sing J. Ou, Shawn Clouthier, Shivani H. Patel, Hasan Korkaya, Amber Heath, Julie Dutcher, Celina G. Kleer, Younghun Jung, Gabriela Dontu, Russell Taichman; from Centre de Recherche en Cancerologie de Marseille: Christophe Ginestier

Funding: National Institutes of Health, Taubman Research Institute

Disclosure: Wicha has financial holdings in OncoMed Pharmaceuticals, which has applied for a patent on cancer stem cell technologies.

OPEN ACCESS: Breast Cancer Stem Cells Are Regulated by Mesenchymal Stem Cells through Cytokine Networks
[Cancer Research]
We have used in vitro and mouse xenograft models to examine the interaction between breast cancer stem cells (CSC) and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSC). We show that both of these cell populations are organized in a cellular hierarchy in which primitive aldehyde dehydrogenase expressing mesenchymal cells regulate breast CSCs through cytokine loops involving IL6 and CXCL7. In NOD/SCID mice, labeled MSCs introduced into the tibia traffic to sites of growing breast tumor xenografts where they accelerated tumor growth by increasing the breast CSC population. With immunochemistry, we identified MSC-CSC niches in these tumor xenografts as well as in frozen sections from primary human breast cancers. Bone marrow-derived MSCs may accelerate human breast tumor growth by generating cytokine networks that regulate the CSC population.
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2011, 07:08 AM   #2
Rich66
Senior Member
 
Rich66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South East Wisconsin
Posts: 3,431
Re: drugs already approved indirectly attack breast cancer stem cells (responsible fo

Quote:
Researchers then identified two signals from a cytokine network - a type of protein that affects how cells communicate - that were responsible for stem cell regulation. These same cytokines play a role in inflammation and drugs that block them have already been approved for the treatment of inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis.
Ok...which drugs?
__________________

Mom's treatment history (link)
Rich66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2011, 08:43 AM   #3
Ellie F
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,526
Re: drugs already approved indirectly attack breast cancer stem cells (responsible fo

I was wondering to!
Any idea Lani?

Thanks
Ellie
Ellie F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2011, 03:44 PM   #4
Trish
Senior Member
 
Trish's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 434
Re: drugs already approved indirectly attack breast cancer stem cells (responsible fo

I'd love to know too. I think I could develop rheumatoid arthritis.... Thanks Trish
__________________
5/2004 (R) 30mm bre gr3 infiltrating ductal ca 16/18nodes er (2+) pr (3+) HER2 (3+)
6/2004
6 cycles(FEC), Oct 40 rads, Tamoxifen
5/2006
oopherectomy, Arimedex
12/2006
liver mets largest 9cm
1/2007
Herceptin,
3/2007
Taxol + Herc
1/2008
Herc alone
4/2008
Multiple bone mets,Zometa
7/2008
Herc + Gemcitabine
8/2008
Herc+Navelbine/vinoralbine
10/2008
Herc+Carboplatin+Taxol
12/2008
Tykerb+Xeloda
2/2010
Herceptin + trial drug
5/2010
Herceptin+Tykerb
8/2010
Tykerb+Abraxane
9/2010
Abraxane
12/2010
Abraxane+Tyk+Herc
4/2011
Tyk+Herc+Femara
6/2011
Liver and bone mets prog.Abraxane continue Herceptin,Tykerb,Femara and Zometa
8/2011
Probable liver progression and increased neuropathy. Xeloda with Tyk+Herc. Zometa 6 weekly.
9/2011
Liver progression,TM +++. Cyclophosphamide and Methotrexate metro Herc Zometa
10/2011 liver mets prog.Herc, 3 Tykerb +2mg decodron daily,Zometa
Trish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2011, 04:39 PM   #5
Chelee
Senior Member
 
Chelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern, CA
Posts: 2,511
Re: drugs already approved indirectly attack breast cancer stem cells (responsible fo

I would love to know which drugs also?

Chelee
__________________
DX: 12-20-05 - Stage IIIA, Her2/Neu, 3+++,Er & Pr weakly positive, 5 of 16 pos nodes.
Rt. MRM on 1-3-06 -- No Rads due to compromised lungs.
Chemo started 2-7-06 -- TCH - - Finished 6-12-06
Finished yr of wkly herceptin 3-19-07
3-15-07 Lt side prophylactic simple mastectomy. -- Ooph 4-05-07
9-21-09 PET/CT "Recurrence" to Rt. axllia, Rt. femur, ilium. Possible Sacrum & liver? Now stage IV.
9-28-09 Loading dose of Herceptin & started Zometa
9-29-09 Power Port Placement
10-24-09 Mass 6.4 x 4.7 cm on Rt. femur head.
11-19-09 RT. Femur surgery - Rod placed
12-7-09 Navelbine added to Herceptin/Zometa.
3-23-10 Ten days of rads to RT femur. Completed.
4-05-10 Quit Navelbine--Herceptin/Zometa alone.
5-4-10 Appt. with Dr. Slamon to see what is next? Waiting on FISH results from femur biopsy.
Results to FISH was unsuccessful--this happens less then 2% of the time.
7-7-10 Recurrence to RT axilla again. Back to UCLA for options.
Chelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2011, 12:18 AM   #6
Rich66
Senior Member
 
Rich66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South East Wisconsin
Posts: 3,431
Re: drugs already approved indirectly attack breast cancer stem cells (responsible fo

And so...
__________________

Mom's treatment history (link)
Rich66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2011, 04:57 AM   #7
Jackie07
Senior Member
 
Jackie07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: "Love never fails."
Posts: 5,808
Re: drugs already approved indirectly attack breast cancer stem cells (responsible fo

http://arthritis.about.com/od/inflam.../cytokines.htm
__________________
Jackie07
http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2011/06/doctors-letter-patient-newly-diagnosed-cancer.html
http://www.asco.org/ASCOv2/MultiMedi...=114&trackID=2

NICU 4.4 LB
Erythema Nodosum 85
Life-long Central Neurocytoma 4x5x6.5 cm 23 hrs 62090 semi-coma 10 d PT OT ST 30 d
3 Infertility tmts 99 > 3 u. fibroids > Pills
CN 3 GKRS 52301
IDC 1.2 cm Her2 +++ ER 5% R. Lmptmy SLNB+1 71703 6 FEC 33 R Tamoxifen
Recc IIB 2.5 cm Bi-L Mast 61407 2/9 nds PET
6 TCH Cellulitis - Lymphedema - compression sleeve & glove
H w x 4 MUGA 51 D, J 49 M
Diastasis recti
Tamoxifen B. scan
Irrtbl bowel 1'09
Colonoscopy 313
BRCA1 V1247I
hptc hemangioma
Vertigo
GI - > yogurt
hysterectomy/oophorectomy 011410
Exemestane 25 mg tab 102912 ~ 101016 stopped due to r. hip/l.thigh pain after long walk
DEXA 1/13
1-2016 lesions in liver largest 9mm & 1.3 cm onco. says not cancer.
3-11 Appendectomy - visually O.K., a lot of puss. Final path result - not cancer.
Start Vitamin D3 and Calcium supplement (600mg x2)
10-10 Stopped Exemestane due to r. hip/l.thigh pain OKed by Onco 11-08-2016
7-23-2018 9 mm groundglass nodule within the right lower lobe with indolent behavior. Due to possible adenocarcinoma, Recommend annual surveilence.
7-10-2019 CT to check lung nodule.
1-10-2020 8mm stable nodule on R Lung, two 6mm new ones on L Lung, a possible lymph node involvement in inter fissule.
"I WANT TO BE AN OUTRAGEOUS OLD WOMAN WHO NEVER GETS CALLED AN OLD LADY. I WANT TO GET SHARP EDGED & EARTH COLORED, TILL I FADE AWAY FROM PURE JOY." Irene from Tampa

Advocacy is a passion .. not a pastime - Joe
Jackie07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2011, 05:04 AM   #8
Ellie F
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,526
Re: drugs already approved indirectly attack breast cancer stem cells (responsible fo

Thanks Jackie.
Makes you wonder,I have known a great many ppl on these types of drugs who never seem to develop cancer.

Ellie
Ellie F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2011, 07:54 AM   #9
Joan M
Senior Member
 
Joan M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,851
Re: drugs already approved indirectly attack breast cancer stem cells (responsible fo

Perhaps Rituxan (rituximab) is one such drug. This drug is used for certain types of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, but also I believe for rheumatoid arthritis and is also an anti-inflammatory. I understand that cancer involves inflammation of a sort.

And Rich, you're right. Shoddy reporting.

Joan
__________________
Diagnosed stage 2b in July 2003 (2.3 cm, HER2+, ER-/PR-, 7+ nodes). Treated with mastectomy (with immediate DIEP flap reconstruction), AC + T/Herceptin (off label). Cancer advanced to lung in Jan. 2007 (1 cm nodule). Started Herceptin every 3 weeks. Lung wedge resection April 2007. Cancer recurred in lung April 2008. RFA of lung in August 2008. 2nd annual brain MRI in Oct. 2008 discovered 2.6 cm cystic tumor in left frontal lobe. Craniotomy Oct. 2008 (ER-/PR-/HER2-) followed by targeted radiation (IMRT). Coughing up blood Feb. 2009. Thoractomy July 2009 to cut out fungal ball of common soil fungus (aspergillus) that grew in the RFA cavity (most likely inhaled while gardening). No cancer, only fungus. Removal of tiny melanoma from upper left arm, plus sentinel lymph node biopsy in Feb. 2016. Guardant Health liquid biopsy in Feb. 2016 showed mutations in 4 subtypes of TP53. Repeat of Guardant Health biopsy in Jana. 2021 showed 3 TP53 mutations, BRCA1 mutation and CHEK2 mutation. Invitae genetic testing showed negative for all of these. Living with MBC since 2007. Stopped Herceptin Hylecta (injection) treatment in March 2020. Recent 2021 annual CT of chest, abdomen and pelvis and annual brain MRI showed NED. Praying for NED forever!!

Last edited by Joan M; 01-24-2011 at 07:56 AM..
Joan M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2011, 08:54 PM   #10
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: drugs already approved indirectly attack breast cancer stem cells (responsible fo

http://www.cancer.med.umich.edu/news...atment10.shtml

Repertaxin blocks interleukin 8 and interrupts a critical signal that allows breast cancers cells to grow. This may not be one of the drugs mentioned in the article you folks are discussing. But perhaps still useful information, so I wanted to make it available to you.

I'm not a cancer patient or a cancer survivor. I do in depth research related to investing in biotech and have a science background. I just happened onto your website while investigating the relationship between cancer stem cells and pro-inflammatory cell signalling.

Another already approved drug worth looking at is itraconazole. It's an anti-fungal that has been found to block the SHH pathway, which appears to play a role in cancer stem cell growth.

http://www.reyalab.org/manage/user_f...1274278169.pdf

Best to all.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2011, 03:19 AM   #11
Trish
Senior Member
 
Trish's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 434
Re: drugs already approved indirectly attack breast cancer stem cells (responsible fo

Thanks everyone.
Trish
__________________
5/2004 (R) 30mm bre gr3 infiltrating ductal ca 16/18nodes er (2+) pr (3+) HER2 (3+)
6/2004
6 cycles(FEC), Oct 40 rads, Tamoxifen
5/2006
oopherectomy, Arimedex
12/2006
liver mets largest 9cm
1/2007
Herceptin,
3/2007
Taxol + Herc
1/2008
Herc alone
4/2008
Multiple bone mets,Zometa
7/2008
Herc + Gemcitabine
8/2008
Herc+Navelbine/vinoralbine
10/2008
Herc+Carboplatin+Taxol
12/2008
Tykerb+Xeloda
2/2010
Herceptin + trial drug
5/2010
Herceptin+Tykerb
8/2010
Tykerb+Abraxane
9/2010
Abraxane
12/2010
Abraxane+Tyk+Herc
4/2011
Tyk+Herc+Femara
6/2011
Liver and bone mets prog.Abraxane continue Herceptin,Tykerb,Femara and Zometa
8/2011
Probable liver progression and increased neuropathy. Xeloda with Tyk+Herc. Zometa 6 weekly.
9/2011
Liver progression,TM +++. Cyclophosphamide and Methotrexate metro Herc Zometa
10/2011 liver mets prog.Herc, 3 Tykerb +2mg decodron daily,Zometa
Trish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2011, 04:44 AM   #12
Ellie F
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,526
Re: drugs already approved indirectly attack breast cancer stem cells (responsible fo

Thanks to all and to unregistered for your interest. It's often good to have different perspectives.

Ellie
Ellie F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2011, 07:26 AM   #13
das
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 28
Re: drugs already approved indirectly attack breast cancer stem cells (responsible fo

Do you think this is related to the reported decreased risk of recurrence associated with NSAIDs use?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17404892
__________________
IDC 6/2010
ER+PR+HER2+
Lumpectomy & SNB
0/2 nodes
2.7cm
das is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 06:16 AM   #14
kiwigirl
Senior Member
 
kiwigirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Matakana which is one hour north of Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 89
Re: drugs already approved indirectly attack breast cancer stem cells (responsible fo

What about dexamethasone (Decadron) as this used for rheumatoid arthritis and reduces inflammation.
__________________
Oct 2009 Masectomy 6 cm Tumor . Sentinal node biopsy , Node Positive . Her2 + er/pr -.
Nov 2009 X3 Taxane and Herceptin, X3 FEC
March 2010 25 Rads
March 2010 continued on Herception untill 16 Dec 2010
May 2010 Ultra Sound .... ALL CLEAR... NED
August 2010 started vaccine trial University of Washington
7th Dec 2010 finished vaccine trial
20th Dec 2010 Port removed
3rd Feb no longer ned brain mets
23r Feb start VMAT radiation
August 2011 two new mets to brain and others starting to grow again !!!!
August start tykerb and xeloda
Dec 1 MRI all small brain mets gone. Largest shrunk by 50% only three small ones to go 17mm,8mm,6mm. Mets on there way out. Yeah
kiwigirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 10:36 AM   #15
Rich66
Senior Member
 
Rich66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South East Wisconsin
Posts: 3,431
Re: drugs already approved indirectly attack breast cancer stem cells (responsible fo

Ah..I remember the Repertaxin/Il-8 article by Wicha. Searching on it today, now called Reparaxin, but still investigational:
http://www.biocentury.com/products/reparixin

Hadn't heard of the Itraconazol. But yes..it's available!
Joan, did you have some for the fungal ball? Seems like one might be able to justify some based on relatively common nail fungi:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0000916

Not sure which form (pill, solution) would be best for off label cancer use.
__________________

Mom's treatment history (link)
Rich66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 11:29 AM   #16
AlaskaAngel
Senior Member
 
AlaskaAngel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,018
Question Re: drugs already approved indirectly attack breast cancer stem cells (responsible fo

As long as we are speculating... (DebbieL, where are you?)

I have long wondered whether the supposedly beneficial effects of chemotherapy had more to do with the support drugs given during chemotherapy than they did with the chemotherapy, since trials do not separate those effects out. Is the torture of chemotherapy getting the "credit" for beneficial effects that are in reality provided by other drugs? Is the chemo essential, or not?

Is it the anti-inflammatory effects of steroids (that are given in order for the body to better tolerate such toxic therapy) the real workhorses that provide the initial magic of nonrecurrence, for example? And at the same time, do they start a chain of events that encourage recurrence farther down the road, such as from slower metabolism and greater weight gain? And how dependent are they on one's stage of development for their results -- favorable or unfavorable?

Maybe if endocrinologists were more involved in the understanding and application of our treatment we would have a more disciplined scientific approach to it.

AlaskaAngel
__________________
Dx 2002 age 51
bc for granny, aunt, cousin, sister, mother.
ER+/PR+/HER2+++, grade 3
IDC 1.9 cm, some DCIS, Stage 1, Grade 3
Lumpectomy, CAFx6 (no blood boosters), IMRT rads, 1 3/4 yr tamoxifen
Rads necrosis
BRCA 1 & 2 negative
Trials: Early detection OVCA; 2004 low-dose testosterone for bc survivors
Diet: Primarily vegetarian organic; metformin (no diabetes), vitamin D3
Exercise: 7 days a week, 1 hr/day
No trastuzumab, no taxane, no AI
NED
AlaskaAngel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 05:39 PM   #17
Joan M
Senior Member
 
Joan M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,851
Re: drugs already approved indirectly attack breast cancer stem cells (responsible fo

Rich,

Yes, I did. When I had the fungal ball, or mycetoma, in my lung, I took voriconazole, which is an advanced form of itraconazozle. I then came across an article last spring about itraconazole's potential use in blocking the Hedgehog pathway in cancer. I sent an e-mail to the scientist doing the research, asking whether voriconazole would have the same effect. Here's his answer (which I really appreciated, as he took the time to explain it):

Please be aware that I am not clinically trained and cannot advise you on your medical condition.

In response to your question, our article described an effect of itraconazole on the Hedgehog signaling pathway, which plays an important role in organizing the normal pattern of embryonic growth and development, and also can play a role in the abnormal growth of certain tumors.

The effect of itraconazole on Hedgehog signaling is by a mechanism distinct from its effect on fungal growth. Other antifungal drugs, including voraconazole (Vfend) act on fungal growth by a mechanism similar to that of itraconazole but, unlike itraconazole, do not efficiently inhibit the Hh pathway. We specifically tested several other azole antifungals (the class of drug that includes itraconazole and voraconazole) and saw little effect if any on Hedgehog signaling (voraconazole was completely inactive in affecting the Hedgehog pathway).

To help you think about this, imagine two keys that have similar shafts and can both open the same lock, but have very different bows (the part you hold when you are turning the key). In this analogy, the effect of itraconazole on the Hh pathway is due to the structure of the bow. Voraconazole is also able to inhibit fungal growth because it has a similar shaft, but not the Hedgehog pathway because the bow is very different.

I would therefore not expect your treatment with Vfend to have had much or any effect on the Hedgehog pathway. A separate question is what role the Hedgehog signaling pathway may have in breast cancer. I cannot answer that question, although we are interested and have attempted to obtain funding to study it (with no success thus far).

I hope this helps. I wish you all the best.

*****
I was hoping to get a lucky break since I took Vfend for four months. Genetech is also studying the Hedgehog pathway in breast cancer.

Joan
__________________
Diagnosed stage 2b in July 2003 (2.3 cm, HER2+, ER-/PR-, 7+ nodes). Treated with mastectomy (with immediate DIEP flap reconstruction), AC + T/Herceptin (off label). Cancer advanced to lung in Jan. 2007 (1 cm nodule). Started Herceptin every 3 weeks. Lung wedge resection April 2007. Cancer recurred in lung April 2008. RFA of lung in August 2008. 2nd annual brain MRI in Oct. 2008 discovered 2.6 cm cystic tumor in left frontal lobe. Craniotomy Oct. 2008 (ER-/PR-/HER2-) followed by targeted radiation (IMRT). Coughing up blood Feb. 2009. Thoractomy July 2009 to cut out fungal ball of common soil fungus (aspergillus) that grew in the RFA cavity (most likely inhaled while gardening). No cancer, only fungus. Removal of tiny melanoma from upper left arm, plus sentinel lymph node biopsy in Feb. 2016. Guardant Health liquid biopsy in Feb. 2016 showed mutations in 4 subtypes of TP53. Repeat of Guardant Health biopsy in Jana. 2021 showed 3 TP53 mutations, BRCA1 mutation and CHEK2 mutation. Invitae genetic testing showed negative for all of these. Living with MBC since 2007. Stopped Herceptin Hylecta (injection) treatment in March 2020. Recent 2021 annual CT of chest, abdomen and pelvis and annual brain MRI showed NED. Praying for NED forever!!

Last edited by Joan M; 02-06-2011 at 05:43 PM..
Joan M is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter