HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-22-2009, 02:32 PM   #20
alicem
Senior Member
 
alicem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 430
Re: How did you discover your cancer?

I missed the statistics that support the recent mammogram recommendations. What percentage of cancers are found because of mammograms given to women in their 40's? 20%? 10%? What person out there wants that person whose life might be saved - but won't be because of the new treatment recommendations - to be someone they love dearly?

The mammogram that saved my life was done when I was 52. However, it had been too many years since my previous one. Perhaps the calcifications might have shown up on a mammogram 3 years earlier when I was 49 and it still might have been just DCIS, stage 0 and the Her2+++ invasive cancer that had to be treated by chemo would never have happened. I blame myself for this, but I had become complacent. My primary care physician had told me in my early 40's that I would NEVER get breast cancer. HAH!!!

Lets fast forward to the next treatment that might fall under the gun for the next round of "cost savings/harm prevention" - - biopsies. When my calcifications were found, I was told not to be worried because in my particular situation, 90% of the time it would turn up nothing. Because 10% of the time it does turn up cancer, it was the recommendation to have a biopsy. I fell in the 10%. It worries me that the same argument could be made for biopsies in my situation. Statistically, calcifications like mine are nothing. Statistically, 90% of the women are put under the "stress" of a biopsy for no reason. Is the cost of these "unnecessary" biopsies for those 90% TOO GREAT??? In my opinion, NO!! If it weren't for this particular standard of care, I would be facing a different outcome entirely. My mammogram found calcifications. My calcifications led to a biopsy. The biopsy led to a lumpectomy. The lumpectomy led to a mastectomy. The mastectomy FOUND MY INVASIVE CANCER before my lymph nodes became involved!! If it weren't for the biopsy, I believe the cancer would have progressed to the point where my odds of survival were greatly reduced. It scares me that in the future, a women with my scenario might face a totally different result - because it was more important to cut costs.
__________________
9/15/08 (age 52) - Mammo: calcifications
9/22/08 - Biopsy: DCIS, grade 3. ER,PR status: Pos. in 75-90% of tumor cells.
10/01/08 - Ob/Gyn appt.: found complex, mostly cystic mass on right ovary - 11cmx12cmx 8cm
10/15/08 - Hysterectomy & Oophorectomy, Lumpectomy: Cyst on uterus, not ovary - all was benign. Breast - 5 of 6 bad margins. 2 Sentinel Lymph nodes removed, both negative. Stage 0, Tis, N0
12/11/08 - Mastectomy & DIEP reconstruction: Surprise! 2 cm Invasive DC, grade 2 found. One benign internal mammary lymph node. Stage 1, T1c, N0, all clean margins. ER+ (Proportion Score = 2/5, Intensity Score = 2/3) and PR+(Proportion Score = 3/5, Intensity Score = 2/3)
HER2 score = 3+
1/09/09 - Oncotype DX: Recurrence S/core of 60 !?!?! ER status is NEG!! PR staus is NEG! HER2 score = 12.2 (still positive, greater than 11.5 is positive).
1/20/09 - Started chemo: TCH
5/26/09 - FINISHED CHEMO!
1/05/10 - FINISHED HERCEPTIN!
1/22/10 - Port-a-catheter removed!
3/07/18 - Still NED
9/10/23 - Still NED
alicem is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter