HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-01-2008, 08:39 AM   #1
hutchibk
Senior Member
 
hutchibk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,519
If I read this right, I think I am really glad that we have stuck to Estrace...
__________________
Brenda

NOV 2012 - 9 yr anniversary
JULY 2012 - 7 yr anniversary stage IV (of 50...)

Nov'03~ dX stage 2B
Dec'03~
Rt side mastectomy, Her2+, ER/PR+, 10 nodes out, one node positive
Jan'04~
Taxotere/Adria/Cytoxan x 6, NED, no Rads, Tamox. 1 year, Arimadex 3 mo., NED 14 mo.
Sept'05~
micro mets lungs/chest nodes/underarm node, Switched to Aromasin, T/C/H x 7, NED 6 months - Herceptin only
Aug'06~
micro mets chest nodes, & bone spot @ C3 neck, Added Taxol to Herceptin
Feb'07~ Genetic testing, BRCA 1&2 neg

Apr'07~
MRI - two 9mm brain mets & 5 punctates, new left chest met, & small increase of bone spot C3 neck, Stopped Aromasin
May'07~
Started Tykerb/Xeloda, no WBR for now
June'07~
MRI - stable brain mets, no new mets, 9mm spots less enhanced, CA15.3 down 45.5 to 9.3 in 10 wks, Ty/Xel working magic!
Aug'07~
MRI - brain mets shrunk half, NO NEW BRAIN METS!!, TMs stable @ 9.2
Oct'07~
PET/CT & MRI show NED
Apr'08~
scans still show NED in the head, small bone spot on right iliac crest (rear pelvic bone)
Sept'08~
MRI shows activity in brain mets, completed 5 fractions/5 consecutive days of IMRT to zap the pesky buggers
Oct'08~
dropped Xeloda, switched to tri-weekly Herceptin in combo with Tykerb, extend to tri-monthly Zometa infusion
Dec'08~
Brain MRI- 4 spots reduced to punctate size, large spot shrunk by 3mm, CT of torso clear/pelvis spot stable
June'09~
new 3-4mm left cerrebellar spot zapped with IMRT targeted rads
Sept'09~
new 6mm & 1 cm spots in pituitary/optic chiasm area. Rx= 25 days of 3D conformal fractionated targeted IMRT to the tumors.
Oct'09~
25 days of low dose 3D conformal fractionated targeted IMRT to the bone mets spot on rt. iliac crest that have been watching for 2 years. Added daily Aromasin back into treatment regimen.
Apr'10~ Brain MRI clear! But, see new small spot on adrenal gland. Change from Aromasin back to Tamoxifen.
June'10~ Tumor markers (CA15.3) dropped from 37 to 23 after one month on Tamoxifen. Continue to monitor adrenal gland spot. Remain on Tykerb/Herceptin/Tamoxifen.
Nov'10~ Radiate positive mediastinal node that was pressing on recurrent laryngeal nerve, causing paralyzed larynx and a funny voice.
Jan'11~ MRI shows possible activity or perhaps just scar tissue/necrotic increase on 3 previously treated brain spots and a pituitary spot. 5 days of IMRT on 4 spots.
Feb'11~ Enrolled in T-DM1 EAP in Denver, first treatment March 25, 2011.
Mar'11~ Finally started T-DM1 EAP in Denver at Rocky Mountain Cancer Center/Rose on Mar. 25... hallelujah.

"I would rather be anecdotally alive than statistically dead."
hutchibk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008, 09:55 AM   #2
dlaxague
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 221
Estrace - I use it too but "heard" this study differently

Brenda said: "If I read this right, I think I am really glad that we have stuck to Estrace..."

Hmm. I dunno. The only reason Estrace wasn't implicated was that they didn't study it. I'd assume that its absorption would be just as bad (or good, depending upon your perspective). I started with Estring which at that time had shown the smallest systemic absorption. But over the years that just wasn't cutting it and now I use a dab of Estrace.

However. This is just one study. There are other (older) studies that do not show much systemic change and what they show is typically still within normal menopausal ranges. I don't have those normal ranges at the tip of my fingers so cannot say if this studies "5-fold increase" took the levels above normal menopausal ranges.

Plus, I'm assuming that the dose used (1g of Premarin cream) is much larger than my dab - an applicator-ful I'd guess.

So I'm hedging, on my personal decision. I wish they'd do some large studies on menopausal breast cancer survivors. Since the majority are on hormone therapy, I'd like to see these results of serum levels for those on Tamoxifen, and especially on AI's. But the only thing that will really tell the tale is to do long term recurrence and survival studies. And that won't be in time to help us figure out the best thing for us, today.

Debbie Laxague
dlaxague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008, 10:07 AM   #3
RobinP
Senior Member
 
RobinP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 943
Dr. Love Recommends Only Using The Smallest Amount Of Vaginal Estrogen Cream To Combat Vaginal Atrophy And Assoc. Symptoms, Which May Have A Lot Less Serum Estrogen Level Impact.
__________________
Robin
2002- dx her2 positive DCIS/bc TX Mast, herceptin chemo
RobinP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008, 10:17 AM   #4
Becky
Senior Member
 
Becky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Stockton, NJ
Posts: 4,179
As a Premarin cream user (down to 0.5g every other Wednesday), I want to comment that we don't know the vaginal atrophic state of the women in the study. If they started out fully atrophic, then their vaginal vault had no mature cells in the lining to prevent any absorption of estrogens into the bloodstream. Also, they were using the cream everyday at 1g (1g - 1.5g is the usual dose to be given daily via package directions. After relief, one should scale back to the smallest effective dose). So, they are measuring the estrogen uptake during the absolute worst time ever_ during true therapy to replenish local estrogen levels in order to get maturation of immature vaginal epithelial cells. Not a good study at all. Good only in that we know that even Estring causes a temporary rise in systemic estrogen for the same reason and then it scales back.

I have had my prior to use level taken and then my onc didn't want to remeasure until after 6 wks on Estring (started with this product) and my level was the same. At 9 months, I switched to the small dose of Premarin once a week to "maintain" and I eventually moved to the once every other week and I am fine. I don't worry about this issue at all due to a healthy vagina protecting me as well as such a reduced use.
__________________
Kind regards

Becky

Found lump via BSE
Diagnosed 8/04 at age 45
1.9cm tumor, ER+PR-, Her2 3+(rt side)
2 micromets to sentinel node
Stage 2A
left 3mm DCIS - low grade ER+PR+Her2 neg
lumpectomies 9/7/04
4DD AC followed by 4 DD taxol
Used Leukine instead of Neulasta
35 rads on right side only
4/05 started Tamoxifen
Started Herceptin 4 months after last Taxol due to
trial results and 2005 ASCO meeting & recommendations
Oophorectomy 8/05
Started Arimidex 9/05
Finished Herceptin (16 months) 9/06
Arimidex Only
Prolia every 6 months for osteopenia

NED 18 years!

Said Christopher Robin to Pooh: "You must remember this: You're braver than you believe and stronger than you seem and smarter than you think"

Last edited by Becky; 10-01-2008 at 01:23 PM..
Becky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008, 11:59 AM   #5
Hopeful
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,380
Becky,

I agree with you - this does not seem to be a very well designed study. Also, the amounts of these preparations the participants used, plus the frequency of use, are not at all what bc patients are advised to do, so the applicability to our demographic is not a one-to-one correspondence.

My surgeon and gyn are very supportive of my use of Estrace under their supervision and as they direct, which is very similar to your usage. My rads onc would prefer I use e-string, but is not against local estrogen therapy in general.

Some parts of the body require some estrogen to function, and they are parts I, for one, want in good working order!

Hopeful
Hopeful is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008, 12:15 PM   #6
AlaskaAngel
Senior Member
 
AlaskaAngel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,018
One more opinion

Having used the Estring for several years as a Stage I, and then dropping off it for various reasons, I agree with Hopeful and Becky that even though it is in some ways less convenient to use Estrace than the Estring, using Estrace does let one adjust the dose to fit the need better. I'm back on the Estring at present, but planning to get a prescription for Estrace. Also, I did find that the Estring ring itself ended up being somewhat uncomfortable for intercourse at times (it seemed to pull on the tissues sometimes with movements).

AlaskaAngel
AlaskaAngel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter