HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-09-2008, 03:25 PM   #1
Sherryg683
Senior Member
 
Sherryg683's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,014
Differences in cancer grades?

How important is the grade of cancer to prognosis and what exactly does it mean? I see a lot are grade III. My report told me that I was grade II, my surgeon said that was good news. The only good news she had to tell me...what exactly do the cancer grades mean..sherryg683
__________________
Sherry

Diagnosed: December , 2005 at age 44
13+ positive lymph nodes
Stage IV , Her2+, 2 small mets to lungsChemo Started: Jan, 2006
4 months Taxotere, Xeloda, Hercepin
NED since April 2006!!
36 Rads to follow with weekly Herceptin indefinately
8 years NED now
Scans every year

Life is not about avoiding the thunderstorms, it's about learning to dance in the rain!
Sherryg683 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2008, 05:15 PM   #2
micheleu
Senior Member
 
micheleu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 154
Sherry, they mean how "aggressive" the cancer is. Usually, but not always, HEr2 neg Hormone positive cancer is grade 1. Most people I know with Her2 pos are grade 3, like myself. I don't know if it has alot to do with prognosis anymore. Probably is one is Her2 neg and Hormone pos it might. It has been around and tested for along time, unlike Her2 testing
__________________
Michele Ulmer

Dx.2003 Stage 3b 35 pos nodes

Dx August 2003 Stage 3B with 35/35 nodes IDC age 39
Lumpectomy
A/C x4 Taxol x12
35 radiation tx
1Year Herceptin in trial
HER2 vaccine trial Seattle
3 months Tykerb off label
NED

micheleu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2008, 06:04 PM   #3
Becky
Senior Member
 
Becky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Stockton, NJ
Posts: 4,179
Michelle is right about grade but there are more things to consider. When scoring cancer, the grade can be the composite of 3 features of your tumor. The histologic grade, the nuclear grade and the mitotic grade. Each of these features is given a score from 1 (low) to 3 (high) and then these 3 scores are added up for a final grade where the lowest score is 3 and the highest score is 9.

Histology is if the cells are tubular or not with tubular being a 1 and practically no tubes is 3. Nuclear grade is how the cells look compared to normal cells with looking alot like normal cells as a 1 and very abnormal looking as 3. The mitotic score is like the Ki 67. Are the cells reproducing slowly then its a 1 or rapidly a 3. Naturally the score "2" is intermediate.

So, what if you score a 1 on histology and nuclear grade but your cancer rapidly divides? You score a 5 (intermediate or grade 2) but is it the same grade 2 if you scored a 2 on histology and nuclear and a 1 on mitotic? Probably not. However, lower scores are better in general. I too am a grade 2 with histology a 3, nuclear a 2 and very, very weirdly - mitotic grade a 1 (I had my pathology redone at Sloan because of this as it is very odd for Her2 to not divide rapidly.

I hope this helps somewhat.
__________________
Kind regards

Becky

Found lump via BSE
Diagnosed 8/04 at age 45
1.9cm tumor, ER+PR-, Her2 3+(rt side)
2 micromets to sentinel node
Stage 2A
left 3mm DCIS - low grade ER+PR+Her2 neg
lumpectomies 9/7/04
4DD AC followed by 4 DD taxol
Used Leukine instead of Neulasta
35 rads on right side only
4/05 started Tamoxifen
Started Herceptin 4 months after last Taxol due to
trial results and 2005 ASCO meeting & recommendations
Oophorectomy 8/05
Started Arimidex 9/05
Finished Herceptin (16 months) 9/06
Arimidex Only
Prolia every 6 months for osteopenia

NED 18 years!

Said Christopher Robin to Pooh: "You must remember this: You're braver than you believe and stronger than you seem and smarter than you think"
Becky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2008, 06:23 PM   #4
Sheila
Senior Member
 
Sheila's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Morris, IL
Posts: 3,507
Becky is right on as usual!!!! This is what is known as the Bloom Richardson Score in the medical world....this may explain it.


Bloom-Richardson Grade for Breast Cancer

Beginning with breast cancer cases diagnosed January 1, 1996, the Bloom-Richardson grading system may be used.

Synonyms include: Modified Bloom-Richardson, Scarff-Bloom-Richardson, SBR Grading, BR Grading, Elston-Ellis modification of Bloom-Richardson grading system. This grading scheme is based on three morphologic features as follows:
  1. <LI class=kadov-p-CSingleSpaced>degree of tumor tubule formation
    <LI class=kadov-p-CSingleSpaced>tumor mitotic acitivity
  2. nuclear pleomorphism of tumor cells (nuclear grade)
Seven possible scores are condensed into three Bloom-Richardson grades. The three grades then translate into well-differentiated (BR low grade), moderately differentiated (BR intermediate grade) and poorly differentiated (BR high grade).
Tumor tubule formation
Score
>75% of tumor cells arranged in tubules
1
>10% and <75%
2
<10%
3
Number of mitoses
(low power scanning (X100), find most mitotically tumor area, proceed to high power (x400)
<10 mitoses in 10 high-power fields
1
>10 and <20 mitoses
2
>20 mitoses per 10 high power fields
3
Nuclear pleomorphism (nuclear grade)
Cell nuclei are uniform in size and shape, relatively small, have dispersed chromatin patterns, and are without prominent nucleoli
1
Cell nuclei are somewhat pleomorphic, have nucleoli, and are intermediate size
2
Cell nuclei are relatively large, have prominent nucleoli or multiple nucleoli, coarse chromatin patterns, and vary in size and shape
3

To obtain the final Bloom-Richardson score, add score from tubule formation plus number of mitoses score, plus score from nuclear pleomorphism. The combined score converts to the following BR grade:
Bloom-Richardson combined scores
Differentiation/BR Grade
ICD-O-3 6th digit
3, 4, 5
Well-differentiated (BR low grade)
1
6, 7
Moderately differentiated (BR intermediate grade)
2
8, 9
Poorly differentiated (BR high grade)
3


There are coding rules and conventions to be used to code breast cancer cases. Use grade or differentiation information from the breast histology in the following order:
  1. <LI class=kadov-p-CSingleSpaced>Bloom-Richardson scores 3-9
    <LI class=kadov-p-CSingleSpaced>Bloom-Richardson grade (low, intermediate, high)
    <LI class=kadov-p-CSingleSpaced>Nuclear grade
    <LI class=kadov-p-CSingleSpaced>Terminology (well diff, mod diff…)
  2. Histologic grade (grade I, grade ii…)
Caution : In this grading system, the terms low, intermediate, and high are codes 1, 2, and 3 respectively. This is an exception to the usual rule for all other grading systems which code "low", "intermediate", and "high" as 2, 3, and 4 respectively. In the Bloom-Richardson system, if grades 1, 2, and 3 are specified, these should be coded 1, 2, and 3 respectively.
Bloom-Richardson scores
Bloom-Richardson scores
Nuclear Grade
Terminology
Histologic Grade
Code
3- 5 points
Low Grade
1/3, 1/2
Well Differentiated
(BR low grade)
1
6, 7 points
Intermediate Grade
2/3
Moderately differentiated
(BR intermediate grade)
2
8, 9 points
High Grade
2/2, 3/3
Poorly Differentiated
(BR high grade)
3
__________________
"Be kinder than necessary, for everyone you meet
is fighting some kind of battle."



Hugs & Blessings
Sheila
Diagnosed at age 49.99999 2/21/2002 via Mammography (Calcifications)
Core Biopsy 2/22/02
L. Mastectomy 2/25/2002
Stage 1, 0.7cm IDC, Node Neg from 19 nodes Her2+++ ER PR Neg
6/2003 Reconstruction W/ Tissue Expander, Silicone Implant
9/2003 Stage IV with Mets to Supraclavicular nodes
9/2003 Began Herceptin every 3 weeks
3/2006 Xeloda 2500mg/Herceptin for recurrence to neck nodes
3/2007 Added back the Xeloda with Herceptin for continued mets to nodes
5/2007 Taken Off Xeloda, no longer working
6/14/07 Taxol/Herceptin/Avastin
3/26 - 5/28/08 Taxol Holiday Whopeeeeeeeee
5/29 2008 Back on Taxol w Herceptin q 2 weeks
4/2009 Progression on Taxol & Paralyzed L Vocal Cord from Nodes Pressing on Nerve
5/2009 Begin Rx with Navelbine/Herceptin
11/09 Progression on Navelbine
Fought for and started Tykerb/Herceptin...nodes are melting!!!!!
2/2010 Back to Avastin/Herceptin
5/2010 Switched to Metronomic Chemo with Herceptin...Cytoxan and Methotrexate
Pericardial Window Surgery to Drain Pericardial Effusion
7/2010 Back to walking a mile a day...YEAH!!!!
9/2010 Nodes are back with a vengence in neck
Qualified for TDM-1 EAP
10/6/10 Begin my miracle drug, TDM-1
Mixed response, shrinking internal nodes, progression skin mets after 3 treatments
12/6/10 Started Halaven (Eribulen) /Herceptin excellent results in 2 treatments
2/2011 I CELEBRATE my 9 YEAR MARK!!!!!!!!!!!!!
7/5/11 begin Gemzar /Herceptin for node progression
2/8/2012 Gemzar stopped, Continue Herceptin
2/20/2012 Begin Tomo Radiation to Neck Nodes
2/21/2012 I CELEBRATE 10 YEARS
5/12/2012 BeganTaxotere/ Herceptin is my next miracle for new node progression
6/28/12 Stopped Taxotere due to pregression, Started Perjeta/Herceptin
Sheila is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2008, 06:29 PM   #5
Joan M
Senior Member
 
Joan M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,851
Sherry,

Here's something from the NIH that explains tumor grade:

http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/f...on/tumor-grade

I guess it's basically the same as Becky said with some more elaboration.

Joan
__________________
Diagnosed stage 2b in July 2003 (2.3 cm, HER2+, ER-/PR-, 7+ nodes). Treated with mastectomy (with immediate DIEP flap reconstruction), AC + T/Herceptin (off label). Cancer advanced to lung in Jan. 2007 (1 cm nodule). Started Herceptin every 3 weeks. Lung wedge resection April 2007. Cancer recurred in lung April 2008. RFA of lung in August 2008. 2nd annual brain MRI in Oct. 2008 discovered 2.6 cm cystic tumor in left frontal lobe. Craniotomy Oct. 2008 (ER-/PR-/HER2-) followed by targeted radiation (IMRT). Coughing up blood Feb. 2009. Thoractomy July 2009 to cut out fungal ball of common soil fungus (aspergillus) that grew in the RFA cavity (most likely inhaled while gardening). No cancer, only fungus. Removal of tiny melanoma from upper left arm, plus sentinel lymph node biopsy in Feb. 2016. Guardant Health liquid biopsy in Feb. 2016 showed mutations in 4 subtypes of TP53. Repeat of Guardant Health biopsy in Jana. 2021 showed 3 TP53 mutations, BRCA1 mutation and CHEK2 mutation. Invitae genetic testing showed negative for all of these. Living with MBC since 2007. Stopped Herceptin Hylecta (injection) treatment in March 2020. Recent 2021 annual CT of chest, abdomen and pelvis and annual brain MRI showed NED. Praying for NED forever!!

Last edited by Joan M; 09-09-2008 at 06:32 PM..
Joan M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2008, 06:54 PM   #6
Diana1993
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 48
What is Tykerb "off label"?
Diana1993 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2008, 08:04 PM   #7
micheleu
Senior Member
 
micheleu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 154
if you ae referring to my treatment, Tykerb is only given in trials to women that have not had Herceptin first. I took Herceptin to prevent a recurrence, and that's what they want to happen with Tykerb someday, use it to prevent a recurrence instead of Herceptin. So, I could not qualify to get Tykerb at all. But, off label means, your oncologist can order it for you and IF your insurance will pay for it you can have it. I took it for only 3 months then stopped it. I was having alot of diarrhea side effects from it. (I still have a 3 month stash, just in case!)
__________________
Michele Ulmer

Dx.2003 Stage 3b 35 pos nodes

Dx August 2003 Stage 3B with 35/35 nodes IDC age 39
Lumpectomy
A/C x4 Taxol x12
35 radiation tx
1Year Herceptin in trial
HER2 vaccine trial Seattle
3 months Tykerb off label
NED

micheleu is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter