HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > Articles of Interest
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-19-2007, 05:14 AM   #1
caya
Senior Member
 
caya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Thornhill, Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,320
Thanks for posting this important article Dee. I had my mastectomy at Princess Margaret Hospital in Dec. 2006 - ( known by the locals as PMH) - w world class hospital on the cutting edge of research and clinical trials.


This article was all over the local news here in Toronto yesterday - I could be the poster girl for this article. This version of the article is missing the important section that says : "Since dense tissue can mask tumours, the study authors suggest alternate imaging techniques such as digital mammography, ultrasonography, and MRI, be evaluted for women with extensive breast density." I mention this because I just had a regular mammo and breast ultrasound in June 2006, ( all clear supposedly), then had a breast reduction in Oct. 2006 - my plastic surgeon found my 1.7 cm tumor - subsequent mastectomy in Dec. 2006 - starting chemo next week.

We have to be vigilant in advocating for breast MRIs for dense breast tissue gals. I know I am going to be.
caya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2007, 07:13 AM   #2
Hopeful
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,380
I, too am in this club. I was never counseled about breast density. I had no idea until after my dx, when I went to the mammography center to get all my prior reports. I read that density was an issue for me in a report that was six years old!!!. Not one doctor had ever mentioned it. I would have insisted on much more rigorous screening. In point of fact, I am much more concerned about developing a new primary cancer than having a recurrence of the original one.

Hopeful
Hopeful is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2007, 05:54 PM   #3
dee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Spokane/Warden, WA
Posts: 67
It was noticing and remembering that my mammogram results had mentioned dense breasts the year before cancer arrived (less than a year, actually, about 10 months) that piqued my interest in this article. No one even mentioned it to me back then, I just happen to retain details that seem odd to me, which that term did. Now, this article would seem to indicate I should have received counsel, which, of course, I didn't. Other literature I have read has indicated premenopausal women tend to have denser breasts, so I figured it was just an indication of my youthful stature, not a red light for potential bad news down the road...
__________________
dee

4 year bc/her2neu survivor
dee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter