There are as many "diets" for cancer as there are people with it. This makes it very complicated. Supposedly people with cancer cannot properly digest proteins, fats and I would add "raw" things. Some say, "only raw", others say, "only cooked"----broths, ect. Some say no dairy, others say "raw only". What were my ancestors eating---so many including my grandparents who lived to be in their 90's? I'll tell you: pork, collard greens, cabbage, potatos, side pork, biscuits, cornbread, hoe cake, molasses, honey, butter, buttermilk, ribs, barbeque, fried chicken, dumplings, bean soup, vegetables, ect. I never saw them eat a salad. You know, I love that food still but I hardly ever eat it. But because this disease has made me so thin I eat calorie dense and nutrient rich foods, just out of natural desire. I have actually seen people die on starvation diets such as all juices, no breads and many limitations on foods. In their last weeks of life they are suffering from want of just one tasty bite of something. This is where the "alternaative" treatment for cancer is wrong. That "diet" is everything, that diet will cure cancer. One cancer remedy to watch out for is one that combines strict diet with blame of the cancer patient's personality and attiude. The "cure" involves not only diet, but very extreme physical measures (on a very frail person) such as garlic suppositories, extreme hot and cold baths, hot and ice cold showers. He also says that cancer is the patient's fault in that they bring it on by anger and the "cancer personality" and feeling sorry for themselves.
|