HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-29-2006, 08:42 AM   #1
LovingDaughter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 65
Thank you so much for the kind words, Cathy. This site has provided wonderful information for me! Before I was simply reading the clinical trials posted in the New England Journal of Medicine, but now I have access to so many more resources.

My mom has not had a chest x-ray, ultrasound, bone scan or mri yet. Should I push to have these tests run?

I hope that you are doing well! You will be in my prayers!
__________________
Caregiver to mother, Diane
Diagnosed 3/2006 Stage IIB (T2, N2, M0), Her-2+++, Er/PR-, Grade 3
LovingDaughter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2006, 08:58 AM   #2
Cathya
Senior Member
 
Cathya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 752
The first thing the onc has to do if be sure of what he is dealing with. The only way, regardless of the size of the tumor is to run these tests and do blood work and physical exams. Yes, I would push to have them done. Her2+ cancer is not like others, in my personal opinion. I was negative node wise under the arms but a 1 cm tumor was found by my onc in the supraclavicular node. This totally changed my treatment. Take care.

Cathy
Cathya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2006, 09:24 AM   #3
Cathya
Senior Member
 
Cathya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 752
Ooops. I see by another post that your mother is already on chemo. I suspect that they will hold off all tests (unless they suspect or find something specific) until after the chemo is done. When I was first diagnosed I went through all of these tests right away and it seems to be standard for everyone I know here....in Ontario, Canada. Your mother is not the first one I have heard of on this site where tests are done in different order but....just be sure they are all done at some point. Having found the tumor in my supraclavicular node prior to chemo my onc knew that the spot should be heavily radiated and it was...but...it reacted very well to the chemo and shrunk to nothing within a few treatments. That is my logic for doing these tests up front.

Cathy
Cathya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2006, 11:12 AM   #4
AlaskaAngel
Senior Member
 
AlaskaAngel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,018
HER2 scores

I am going to post some info about the question of HER2 scoring because so many here may not know the answer. However, I still can't answer the question of how significant it might be to have FISH results that are more definitely positive in terms of how well trastuzumab or lapatinib works.

Here's past posts and info:

Here's one source:

http://www.breastcancer.nzco.net/herceptinFAQ.htm

5. What is the FISH test?
The Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization test illuminates the HER2 genes in the tumour sample to see how many there are. If a FISH test detects more than 2 copies of the HER2 gene, this means that the cell is abnormal and the breast cancer is called "FISH positive" which also means the cancer is now called "HER2 positive". These women are also more likely to benefit from Herceptin®. If "FISH negative", then the women will not benefit from Herceptin®.


Here's a better one, from a post on the her2support.org site, by Al, who does a lot of research:

HER2 testing

Tests can be done to find out whether a woman has HER2-positive breast cancer. Testing can be done at the same time as initial breast cancer surgery, or samples of cancer tissue from previous biopsies, or surgery, may be used.

The two main methods used for testing are Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH):

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) can show how much of the HER2 protein is present in the tumour sample. The HER2 level is graded from 0 to 3+
  • 0–1+ means that a normal amount of the HER2 protein is present and the result is HER2-negative.
  • 2+ means that a moderate amount of the HER2 protein is present.
  • 3+ means that there is a higher than normal level of HER2 protein and the result is HER2-positive.
When a tumour is scored at 2+, UK testing guidelines recommend that an extra test is carried out. This is because a result of 2+ does not always mean a cancer cell has a high level of HER2. In this situation, an extra test (known as FISH) is used to give a definite result.

Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH)

Whereas IHC measures the level of HER2 protein in the tumour sample, FISH testing measures the amount of the HER2/neu gene in each cell. This gene is responsible for the overproduction of the HER2 protein.

There is no number scale for FISH testing. The result is either:
  • FISH negative - normal levels of the gene are present, or
  • FISH positive – excessive amounts of the gene are present. This is sometimes called gene amplification.
http://www.cancerbacup.org.uk/Cance...sis/HER2testing
AlaskaAngel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2006, 01:40 PM   #5
LovingDaughter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 65
Thanks a lot for the information, Cathy. I am still going to follow up with the doctors to make sure that the tests are done.
__________________
Caregiver to mother, Diane
Diagnosed 3/2006 Stage IIB (T2, N2, M0), Her-2+++, Er/PR-, Grade 3
LovingDaughter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter