HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-16-2008, 10:31 PM   #27
bashmaz
Senior Member
 
bashmaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 35
I chose not to take herceptin

because back in early 2002 it was a trial and when I read and researched herceptin I was concerned about the number of people who took herceptin and then had brain mets as their first recurrence site. Also, the heart factor wasn't clearly understood back then, plus I didn't want to continue treatment for a full year after completing my standard chemo - it just seemed like enough is enough!

I'm fine with my decision as I'm now over 6 years out and doing fine. I did the UW vaccine trial in 2004 (which I wouldn't have qualified for if I'd had herceptin) plus I recently completed the tykerb/placebo trial (which I also wouldn't have qualified for if I'd had herceptin) - so it's an individual decision, oh and I'm also er/pr-ve.

Hope this helps
Marianne
bashmaz is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter