HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-16-2008, 12:33 PM   #6
CPA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 93
Aside from the insurance issues, I really do not think anybody "dropped the ball".

Almost everybody has the pathology re-done after surgery to confirm the biopsy. Most likely, the lab determined your HER2 status by IHC from the biopsy specimen. I would guess that your oncologist will want the results confirmed by FISH. IHC is basically a test where special stains are used to stain the tumor cells... the pathologist looks at the cells under a microscope and ranks you from a 0-3 scale (or +++) based upon the cell appearance. FISH is a genetic test that returns a ratio relating to the number of HER2 genes present and is generally considered more accurate.

IHC is usually done first because it is quick and cheaper. FISH is more expensive and is only usually done to confirm a positive IHC.
__________________
Husband to Jill
Diagnosed 10/05, age 39
R Mast 11/05
Stage II N0
Her2+ er/pr+
Revision Mast due to positive margins 12/05
TCH Chemo started 1/06
Finished TC 4/06
Tamoxifen
Finished H 12/29/06
Currently NED
CPA is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter