HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-29-2007, 07:03 PM   #5
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,783
I am not reading it that way

and as I said I read the full article 3 times and remain confused as it is very poorly presented.

Overall (ER+ and ER-s combined) recurrence peaked at 2 years and then the recurrence level stayed constant.

This illustrates my contention that it is best to delineate the recurrence rates of different types of breast cancer.

When separating out ER+ vs ER- the latter had two peaks and otherwise was much less likely to recur after 5 years. The former peaked at 2 years but continued to remain elevated many more years out than ER-, especially if there were a large no. of + lymph nodes. The vascular invasion part was particularly poorly worded, both in the abstract and in the article.

I have sort of given up on the article, but just posted it as many voice annoyance that there aren't better stats to give her2+ patients regarding their risk of recurrence and how it varies with time since surgery.
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter