HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-21-2007, 03:56 PM   #1
djofunky
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4
Hi Janet11, They did do it through my port once. ER accessed my port and the Tech just push the blood back in. They contacted an ong to make sure it would be ok. I talked to my Ong after and she also said they could do it. Anyone else have any more info on this. I am not scheduled for another MUGA til April 5th. Help!!!
djofunky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 06:45 PM   #2
janet11
Senior Member
 
janet11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rowlett, TX
Posts: 138
Gad, I sure wish they'd do the MUGAs through my port. One time I even went for the MUGA with my port already accessed (my chemo nurse did it), and they STILL refused to use it. Oh well...
janet11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 08:27 PM   #3
Bev
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 1,055
Based on my reading here, I requested an echo (ultrasound) in lieu of MUGA. Onc looked at me funny and said fine. That's what I have been doing lately. No one has come back arguing that MUGA's are more accurate. ECHO's (no blood or nuclear meds) are so much easier, cheaper, etc. I haven't heard any reason to do otherwise. My initial thought was if you have had recent surgery, that pressure from the transducer might be painfull from the echo. I know nothing about these tests, but I think if you're relatively healthy MUGA's are overkill. Why would someone want nuclear meds injected if the same results could be realized from ultrasound? Unless someone tells me otherwise, I think docs get caught up in the latest and greatest technology and don't think through the side effects vs efficacy. It's not a big deal to them that you're on your 100th poke. BB
Bev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007, 06:32 AM   #4
janet11
Senior Member
 
janet11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rowlett, TX
Posts: 138
MOST interesting. Thanks Bev. I'm going to talk to my onc about this too. My next MUGA is already scheduled -- it would be nice if that's my last.
__________________
Janet in Rowlett Texas

Dx July 2006 IDC 1.8cm, ER-/PR- HER2+ (FISH 7), KI67 High (60%) grade 3, TOPO II neg
Aug2006: lumpectomy, SNB (4 nodes neg), Stage 1
Jan 2007:
Finished 6 cycles of TCH (Taxotere, Carboplatin, Her ceptin). Then Herceptin every 3 weeks.
Feb 2007: Completed Radiation
May 2007: Stopped Herceptin due to low LVEF (49%)
July 2007: LVEF now 44% -- starting Coreg
May 2008: Heart NORMAL! Yippee.
janet11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007, 06:46 AM   #5
Grace
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I agree with Bev about doing an echo instead. My last echo showed a problem in the right ventricle but nothing definitive as I gather a MUGA is designed only to look at left ventricle. So next week today I'm having an echo, as the echo can examine all the muscles. And it was easy to order, as my insurance company didn't have to approve it. From here on in, I'm insisting on an echo.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2007, 04:28 PM   #6
djofunky
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4
Thank you so much for the replies. I have started to write down questions for the cardiologist appt I have tomorrow.

Dina
djofunky is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter