HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-30-2004, 03:54 AM   #1
lauren
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
There is a big difference between brain mets that caused no symptoms and brain mets that were not diagnosed at the time that a patient died of breast cancer. Let me give you an example:

Let's say that patient A has breast cancer that has spread only to her brain, causing her X amount of pain and other symptoms. Now let's say patient B has breast cancer that has spread to her liver, spine and lungs, causing her a great amount of pain and other symptoms PLUS brain mets that also cause her X amount of pain and symptoms. Patient B's other symptoms may (a) mask the symptoms from the brain mets and (B) be prioritized over diagnosing other mets, such as brain, which would require a stoppage of chemo in order to do radiation, while Patient A's brain mets symptoms JUMP to the forefront and lead to a diagnosis. Patient B could potentially die before having her brain mets discovered, while Patient A is in good enough health so that her brain mets can be discovered during her life.

Thus, just because some brain mets go undiagnosed during a patient's life does NOT mean that they caused no symptoms.
  Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter