HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > Breast Cancer News
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 05-13-2014, 08:33 AM   #6
'lizbeth
Senior Member
 
'lizbeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sunny San Diego
Posts: 2,214
Re: Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Worse or Just Different?

Thank you GDP for answering my question: What's next.

I am very excited about the upcoming ASCO conference in Chicago. I know one study I participated in is about to share some exciting news. Another will likely have good news for the SABCS.

It seems we need new lingo. The days of ER +/-, PR +/-, Her2 +/- are about to be left behind. Triple Positive, Triple Negative are too simple with cancer.

I can't believe there are women with lower expressions of Her2 who could have benefited from Herceptin. Yet with the current system it is a decade past the original FDA approval and these women are still grouped in the Triple Negative category, progressing and dying.

Thanks heavens for Research Rebels like Nagourney.
'lizbeth is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter