hmmm, just thinking out loud
After reading Lani's post regarding fasting before chemo., and the comment by Fullofbeans regarding the metabolisms of mice and men, and posts by RB and others, I got to thinking. I haven't had much time lately, but one of my interests has always been physics. In particular, on the one hand, you have the studies of Quantum Mechanics (subatomic particles and energies) and on the other hand, you have Einstein's theories and other physicists/mathemeticians studying the motion of larger planetary bodies and the "laws" governing the movement of those bodies and large expenditures of energies. I'm not an expert, but for years those in this field have been seeking the "Grand Unified Theory", in other words, a formula or formulae that can rectify, or unify the "laws" governing the movements of large bodies versus subatomic bodies. Right now, they don't, if I am correct in understanding. It's thought among alot of physicists right now that they have enough data collected and it's just a matter of looking at the data and/or formulae differently to solve the puzzle. Some are waiting for the next Einstein. Having said all that, I feel that the cure for cancer is right in front of us, but all of the pieces of the puzzle need to be put together. We are so close. The answer is probably there, right now, but we need to find "the Grand Unified Theory of Cancer". I'd like to hear your comments. I know we all feel like we are close, but do any of you feel as if all of the data is there right now, only it needs to be studied as a whole?
|