Does your health provider not give you some sort on information sheet?
Does any health provider?
There are lots of related issues. You might like to read the post on of menstural cycles by Rupali which look at some the the wider impact issues in posts I made with links.
In response to your direct question I cannot give you a succint answer. I have been reading round the subject for somewhile and still am unclear exactly what HER means beyond the basics.
Maybe this link helps explain why. It is complex (and hence my conclusion that as much benifit should be gained from diet as possible see post on articles of interest breast cancer diet, and the importance of omega three and six in breast cancer).
A beginners board on this site that was mainly static with some basics would be very helpful.
RB
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/q...15&query_hl=10
1: Hum Mol Genet. 2003 Dec 15;12(24):3245-58. Epub 2003 Oct 21. Related Articles, Links
Classifying the estrogen receptor status of breast cancers by expression profiles reveals a poor prognosis subpopulation exhibiting high expression of the ERBB2 receptor.
Kun Y, How LC, Hoon TP, Bajic VB, Lam TS, Aggarwal A, Sze HG, Bok WS, Yin WC, Tan P.
National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Recent work using expression profiling to computationally predict the estrogen receptor (ER) status of breast tumors has revealed that certain tumors are characterized by a high prediction uncertainty ('low-confidence'). We analyzed these 'low-confidence' tumors and determined that their 'uncertain' prediction status arises as a result of widespread perturbations in multiple genes whose expression is important for ER subtype discrimination. Patients with 'low-confidence' ER+ tumors exhibited a significantly worse overall survival (P=0.03) and shorter time to distant metastasis (P=0.004) compared with their 'high-confidence' ER+ counterparts, indicating that the 'high-' and 'low-confidence' binary distinction is clinically meaningful. We then discovered that elevated expression of the ERBB2 receptor is significantly correlated with a breast tumor exhibiting a 'low-confidence' prediction, and this association was subsequently validated across multiple independently derived breast cancer expression datasets employing a variety of different array technologies and patient populations. Although ERBB2 signaling has been proposed to inhibit the transcriptional activity of ER, a large proportion of the perturbed genes in the 'low-confidence'/ERBB2+ samples are not known to be estrogen responsive, and a recently described bioinformatic algorithm (DEREF) was used to demonstrate the absence of potential estrogen-response elements (EREs) in their promoters. We propose that a significant portion of ERBB2's effects on ER+ breast tumors may involve ER-independent mechanisms of gene activation, which may contribute to the clinically aggressive behavior of the 'low-confidence' breast tumor subtype.
PMID: 14570715 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]