HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-28-2005, 10:31 PM   #1
Sherri
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello everyone,

You are amazing people. This is the best site I've ever seen for BC support. I think all of you with this great attitude can move moutains. Cancer has got wrong bodies and sooner or later (I hope sooner) has to leave you forever.

I'm 49. DX Dec.2004 at 48. IBC ( one oncologist did'nt agree, the panel said it is IBC?!) several tumors, HER2 3+ hormon Negative, skin mets, very aggressive, grade 3, Node positive, I don't know how many, I never did node surgery, it showed on Pet Scan and they could feel by examination (2 nodes). I did AC+Taxotere dose dense X6 every 2 weeks. 12 days after the last chemo, I did simple mastectomy left breast. And then 19 rads.

I decided against node surgery, I'm very active, mountain climbing and hiking. One onc. supported my decision. The others want me to do the surgery.

I asked for Herceptin from day one (I'm from Canada, BC), they did'nt give it to me. Finaly after Orlando conference, they decided to give it to me.

I already had one and I'll have the second next week.

Do you think I made a right decision?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2005, 11:03 PM   #2
al from canada
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Sherri,

Mets are mets and more surgery would only cause more trauma and not reduce the mets. It is a fairly accepted fact that surgical trauma may aggravate the HER2 and possibly cause the cancer to spread. HER2 is a growth factor and that's also what your body generates for wound healing.

Personally, I think you made a wise decision, contrary to medical tradition.

Good luck,
Al

Ps, My wife an I were recently on the island, Victoria to Ucluelet to Tofino and back...what a wonderful area!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2005, 11:13 PM   #3
*_Sherri_*
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you Al. We live in West Vancouver. If you visit Vancouver, let me know. I love to meet you and your wife.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 04:25 AM   #4
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Al, I am curious about your statement about surgery aggravating or causing the Her2 to grow. I am deciding whether to have reconstruction or not and have not found any info talking about that subject.

I guess i don't agree with the decision . I wanted to get as much of the cancer out of my body as they could by surgery. I think having another Pet scan now and seeing if there is anything remaining in the node area would be helpful.
Laurie
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 09:01 AM   #5
Lisa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I just read an article from the American Cancer Society about Cancer Myths. The very first one was that surgery spreads cancer. Which, if you think about logically, doesn't make sense anyway.

Al, I'd like to see any reference you might have that contradicts this. Thanks.

Love and light,

Lisa
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 10:04 AM   #6
Rhonda4
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Lisa,

I just read that article too and am a little puzzled.

Rhonda
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 10:21 AM   #7
StephN
Senior Member
 
StephN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Misty woods of WA State
Posts: 4,128
About node dissection.
Mine was the lower axilla and they took 15 in that area. Five were found to have cancer, three of them quite overtaken with it. I was GLAD to have them out, and they were not even noticeable as enlarged by feeling on the outside of my skin.

These nodes are embedded in a little "fat pad" of tissue and they remove this. There is a main nerve running through that area and if the surgeon just takes a few more minutes and does not just cut that nerve, you can still have full feeling on the back of your arm. The nerve will be upset and bruised, but will heal. This way we are at less risk of having a small wound (or even mosquito bite) become infected, which can increase the possiblity of lymphedema.

The drain was in for a week and was easy to manage. I shopped, drove myself around and only had very much pain for the first few days. Just had to wear loose shirts that buttoned in the front.

My scar under my arm is hardly noticeable and I had an easy time getting back my normal range of motion. I use my right arm just as before, even though they caution us about heavy lifting or over use. I can't constantly "baby" myself and hope to get anything done!

I did have a lumpectomy only, which also was pretty easy to heal. Given the choice again, I would have these nodes removed, even though I had aggressive chemo afterwards. I am HER2 +++, hormone neg, high grade tumor.
StephN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 04:50 PM   #8
Sherri
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Breast cancer is a systemic disease. What prtects us from diffuse metastatic disease is the ability of our immune system. Immune support is a fundamental principle in both treatment and prevention of BC. A treatment that damages our immune system must be viewed with caution.

It's true that surgery does not spread cancer, but it puts the immune system in emergency mode so cancer cells can grow undetected.

In my case there were 2 possibilities; 1) chemo killed all cancer cells in my lymph nodes 2) the possibilities of lot of cancer cells in lymph nodes and they had to remove a lot of them.

I did a lot of thinking; to me cancer has to be cured internaly. Chemo, surgery and radiation are some tools to help but our immune system is the key to help us get rid of this disease forever.

Our lymphatic system is intimately related and a important part of our immune system. Tumor cells that enter lymphatic channels can also enter the bloodstream having access to our entire body. Given this fact, hastily removing lymph nodes is somewhat akin to closing the ban door after the horses have already gotten out.

I don't know there is a big conteroversy about lymph nodes these days. But I'm sure the future of cancer cure is not surgery and chemo. But Vaccine or drugs like Herceptin which help the immune suystem to kill cancer cells.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2005, 08:08 PM   #9
al from canada
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Ladies,

Lisa and friends, here are the links you requested:

http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi...ull/14/10/1477

Here is one link suggesting the activation of HER2 during the healing process:
http://content.kluweronline.com/arti...7/fulltext.pdf
Here is a transcipt about the same issue:

Rapid Decline After Surgery
1 September 2003

print-friendly


Researchers in Italy investigated why some people go downhill rapidly after having surgery for cancer.


Program Transcript

Norman Swan: Welcome to the program.

Today on The Health Report, what Middle East terrorism is doing to the psyche of its citizens: some surprising findings. What obesity is doing or not doing to the psyche of Australians, and the impact of weight loss.

Plus a common belief that you might think is just anecdotal, with no evidence. It’s the story many of us have heard: the granny, the father, the spouse who was fine till the surgeons opened him up, or her up, then after the operation the cancer ran wild and she or he was dead in no time.

Well it turns out this is real, although not always or not often as dramatic, and it could be a missed cause of cancer relapse. The good news is there may now be an explanation and indeed a solution.

Research from Italy has been investigating this phenomenon in women with breast cancer. Dr Sylvie Menard is Director of the Molecular Targeting Unit at the National Cancer Institute in Milan.

Sylvie Menard: It’s important first of all to identify at time of surgery who are these kind of patients in order to be ready to do something in terms of what surgical therapy. Probably with this oncogene overexpression and amplification we have identified this kind of patient.

Norman Swan: Sylvie Menard’s laboratory in Milan has been studying what she referred to there as oncogenes: genes which produce substances involved in the growth and multiplication of cells. One of these is called the HER2 receptor, which is turned on by growth factors. And when the HER2 receptors are in high numbers in women with breast cancer, it tends to predict a poor outcome. It turns out that women who have an early worsening of their breast cancer after surgery, tend to be HER2 positive.

Sylvie Menard: HER2 is a receptor for growth factors, so it’s very likely to be stimulated by growth factors. So we have tried to identify the mechanism, why these patients have a probability of relapse, and this is why we addressed the issue. What happened at the time of surgery, which kind makes a difference?

Norman Swan: So what did you find that it was about surgery that seemed to cause the problem?

Sylvie Menard: The surgery you must have, wound healing, to repair the damage of the surgery through growth factors.

Norman Swan: So the very facts that you’ve created a wound, and the wound has got to repair itself, the stuff that the wound –

Sylvie Menard: Yes, and with reparation of the wound occur through factors that in some way stimulate the tumour.

Norman Swan: So in a tragic biological irony, the growth factors which are needed to promote wound healing seem to target this HER2 receptor on the tumour cells, promoting their growth as well.

Sylvie Menard again.

Sylvie Menard: The same receptor, and therefore the same kind of proliferation. There are many, many different factors that can stimulate this kind of receptor, and therefore you have stimulation of the wound, but stimulation also of the tumour.

Norman Swan: Now you might be able to imagine that if you got these factors at the site of the wound, it might induce a recurrence of a tumour at the site of the breast, but not necessarily further away.

Sylvie Menard: This factor can go to stimulate dormant tumour cells anywhere. So if you have tumour cells in the bone marrow, tumour cells in the liver.

Norman Swan: So these growth factors go from the wound into the blood stream and spread throughout the body?

Sylvie Menard: Yes.

Norman Swan: So there are two solutions to this: one is you don’t do the operation, and the other presumably is –

Sylvie Menard: This is an impossible situation because surgery is the most important therapy for tumour. The point is that we can plan some therapy in order to operate. Maybe the wound will take a little bit more time to be repaired, but the tumour will not be stimulated.

Norman Swan: And in fact there is an antibody available which blocks the HER2 receptor. It’s called trastuzumab and Dr Menard and her colleagues tried it in the lab and found it works in the test tube. Now they’re doing a trial of it in women undergoing surgery. But this observation that surgery can speed the downhill path of a person with cancer applies to other tumours as well.

Sylvie Menard: There have been a reports for example with colon cancer, which in some cases it has been well demonstrated that after surgery there’s been an early recurrence of disease with multiple metastases. There are many different factors and looking at them and the corresponding receptors on the tumour cell, we will be able to say which tumours will be stimulated by surgery and which not. For HER2 it’s very specific for breast carcinoma.

Norman Swan: So you’re not convinced it’s HER2 in the others, and you’ve got to find out which ones it is?

Sylvie Menard: Yes. So we have to investigate now what kind of factor and what kind of receptor on the tumour cells for all the tumours.

Norman Swan: And then you’ve got to find the blocker that works for them?

Sylvie Menard: Yes, from any kind of surgery, not necessarily an oncological surgery. This may happen even with any kind of surgery which requires repair of the surgical damage.

Norman Swan: So you could have a tumour and have appendicitis, have your appendix out, and the appendix operation could cause this, because the wound for the appendicectomy would produce these growth factors as well?

Sylvie Menard: Yes, this is something that we are looking at, looking at recurrence of the disease later and seeing if the patient has had surgery in between or not. This is not something that’s easy, because the record of the patients are not always very complete. But this may be a possibility that some recurrences occur because dormant cells have been “rescued” from dormancy just because of an operation, which was not a cancer operation, it was for some other problem.

Norman Swan: And what about injuries, like fractures and things like that? Could they also produce these growth factors?

Sylvie Menard: It depends if you have blood clotting. The growth factor is released during the activation of platelets. If you don’t have blood clotting you don’t have release of growth factors. So it’s something that is very specific when you have damage of the tissue and you have blood clotting at the level of the damage.

Norman Swan: And the challenge now is to take this out of the lab into the clinic, using real people to confirm the relevance of the findings.

Dr Sylvie Menard runs the Molecular Targeting Unit at the National Cancer Institute in Milan.

Reference:
Tagliabue E et al Role of HER2 in wound-induced breast carcinoma proliferation. The Lancet August 16, 2003;362:527-533


Guests on this program:
Dr Sylvie Menard
Director,
Molecular Targeting Unit
Department of Experimental Oncology,
Istituto Nazionale Tumori,
via Venezian 1,
20133 Milano, Italy
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2005, 09:43 AM   #10
Christine
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sherri
Your decision seems fine for now. The whole idea in taking the few nodes will give an indication of of the possibility of relapse, but since you already have swelling in 2 node areas, maybe this is sufficient for now being that you are taking Herceptin. If you were me, I would persue taking Herceptin until these nodes go down to normal. My nodes went in remission with Taxol after my first infusion. If possible ask your onc to help you to get the nodes in remission which you can pallpate well enough to get results of the treatments. Hope you will be able to get this done. It is to you benefit to seek a doctor who will give you a chance to make your own decisions so long as they are not life threatening at the moment. I would also like to mention that having node sugery and mountain climbing could cause lympadema in the affected arm since you will be pulling alot of weight on the this arm.
Being her2+ will always be there for you whenever necessary.

Wishing you well. Keep confident Hugs Christine
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2005, 04:58 PM   #11
pgill
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sherri,

Of course you have made the right decision for you! I'm sure you read, thought, listened and then decided. Each of us has to take charge of our treatment and proceed. Once a decision is made we go forward. When another bump in the road appears, we make another informed decision. Each of us is a unique individual. Your decision may or may not be someone else's decision, but it is right for you.

Choose what is best for you. All of the statistics in the world don't tell you how you personally will react to anything.

Go climb those mountains....that is something that just amazes me.


Peggy
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2005, 06:48 PM   #12
Sherri
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you. You are great people. I'm glad I've found you. I love to see you all one day and talk to you in person.

Lots of love and energy to all of you.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter