HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-28-2005, 07:41 PM   #1
Julie2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 556
Talking Back on Herceptin

I want to share with all you guys the good news I heard today.
As you know from my previous posts that my onc. denied Herceptin because my MUGA was 44%. Well It indeed was a computer mistake(I still can't believe it myself) My oncology nurse called me today to say that all the people who had MUGA that day got a low score because of a computer problem. She called me to come and get the Herceptin infusion immediatley. I just got the infusion now. (it is delayed by one week from the original schedule becuse of their mistake).
The past two weeks had been a heart wrenchig experience.
I really want to thank all of you for support me in this bad situation by listening and giving your valuable suggestions.

-Julie
__________________
Diagnosed in Sept 2004 while pregnant with the second child. Stage 3b, tumor 4.5cm, 4 auxillary and supraclav node positive. Her2+++ FISH 9.4 and er-,pr-.
Had dose dense neoadjuvant AC,Taxol then mastectomy,radiation+xeloda+Herceptin.
Julie2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2005, 07:54 PM   #2
Joe
Webmaster
 
Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Home of the "Flying Tomato" Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 2,036
Images: 5
How Wonderful

Julie,
The news is simply great. A weeks delay is nothing to worry about. Christine has cancelled her appointment several times and rescheduled for a week later.

You certainly have taught us a lesson. If test results are unexpected ask for a retest. !!!

Warmest Regards
Joe
Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2005, 08:03 PM   #3
Lolly
Senior Member
 
Lolly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,756
Gosh Julie, that's just the best news! And I agree with Joe, what a good lesson for us all; when in doubt question, question and question!

<3,
Lolly
Lolly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2005, 07:16 PM   #4
Esther
Senior Member
 
Esther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 484
I completely agree with Joe on this. A year ago I had a CT scan come back saying my liver mets had increased in size. I questioned it, since my liver enzymes and CA 27-29 results were really good.

A treatment change hung in the balance. They re-checked my scans, and said it was an interpretation error.

It never hurts to double check in a situation where action or inaction will have a real impact on us.
Esther is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter