View Single Post
Old 11-27-2009, 10:17 PM   #27
Jackie07
Senior Member
 
Jackie07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: "Love never fails."
Posts: 5,808
Re: New Proposed Changes to Mammogram Guidelines

Since all human beings are all going to die at a certain age, why bother with all the immunization, prevention, and treatment? Why not just let everyone die in their natural course? Wouldn't that guarantee a better human race since all the ones with gene/other defects would die unborn, die premature, or die young... I would say that would be the most cost-effective way. (Many had attempted this kind of thinking (practice) since 7, 8 decades ago.)

I could agree to a guideline about not to screen everyone for brain tumor starting age 40 (or any age, for that matter.) During my struggle to have my life-long brain tumor diagnosed and treated, I had experienced the bias of sexism and racism, and problems about insurance coverage (out-of-network special contract, pre-existing condition...etc. ) We actually have had to get a lawyer to be our 'fall-back' person.

But breast cancer involves such a big population. Early detection is so crucial for prolonged lives. It's heartless/senseless to say that a 'mere' 3% extra lives saved is not significant enough to justify the more cautious/cost effective approach. For many of us who are/have been struggling to make sense of the diagnosis of this serious illness, treating us as mere numbers is equivalent to cruel and unusual punishment.

That said, I do think this is a rare opportunity to have a national/global debate on women's health. I'd like to hear more comments from people like Dr. Bernandin Healey, former Director of NIH who's responsible for the Women's Health Initiatives, the first comprehensive study on women's health.

I am breastless, childless... why should I care? Because I want my experience to be heard. I want my case to 'count'. I want to help anyone that can be helped. Chinese has a saying (commonly heard in Kungfu stories,) "Saving one life is better than building a seven-story temple." 'Saving private Ryan' was just on TV a couple of weeks ago for Veteran's Day. Listen to Tom Hank's narration, then think about the breast cancer debate. There's at least one thing the two have in common (in addition to the explanation of why Ryan's life was worth saving), "We are at war."
__________________
Jackie07
http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2011/06/doctors-letter-patient-newly-diagnosed-cancer.html
http://www.asco.org/ASCOv2/MultiMedi...=114&trackID=2

NICU 4.4 LB
Erythema Nodosum 85
Life-long Central Neurocytoma 4x5x6.5 cm 23 hrs 62090 semi-coma 10 d PT OT ST 30 d
3 Infertility tmts 99 > 3 u. fibroids > Pills
CN 3 GKRS 52301
IDC 1.2 cm Her2 +++ ER 5% R. Lmptmy SLNB+1 71703 6 FEC 33 R Tamoxifen
Recc IIB 2.5 cm Bi-L Mast 61407 2/9 nds PET
6 TCH Cellulitis - Lymphedema - compression sleeve & glove
H w x 4 MUGA 51 D, J 49 M
Diastasis recti
Tamoxifen B. scan
Irrtbl bowel 1'09
Colonoscopy 313
BRCA1 V1247I
hptc hemangioma
Vertigo
GI - > yogurt
hysterectomy/oophorectomy 011410
Exemestane 25 mg tab 102912 ~ 101016 stopped due to r. hip/l.thigh pain after long walk
DEXA 1/13
1-2016 lesions in liver largest 9mm & 1.3 cm onco. says not cancer.
3-11 Appendectomy - visually O.K., a lot of puss. Final path result - not cancer.
Start Vitamin D3 and Calcium supplement (600mg x2)
10-10 Stopped Exemestane due to r. hip/l.thigh pain OKed by Onco 11-08-2016
7-23-2018 9 mm groundglass nodule within the right lower lobe with indolent behavior. Due to possible adenocarcinoma, Recommend annual surveilence.
7-10-2019 CT to check lung nodule.
1-10-2020 8mm stable nodule on R Lung, two 6mm new ones on L Lung, a possible lymph node involvement in inter fissule.
"I WANT TO BE AN OUTRAGEOUS OLD WOMAN WHO NEVER GETS CALLED AN OLD LADY. I WANT TO GET SHARP EDGED & EARTH COLORED, TILL I FADE AWAY FROM PURE JOY." Irene from Tampa

Advocacy is a passion .. not a pastime - Joe

Last edited by Jackie07; 12-08-2009 at 08:04 AM..
Jackie07 is offline   Reply With Quote