View Single Post
Old 04-09-2007, 05:14 PM   #10
Becky
Senior Member
 
Becky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Stockton, NJ
Posts: 4,179
Dear Steph


It is such a hard call as less than 10% (in many references) is called negative. Perhaps you should have your slides read elsewhere. For example, less than 10% could be the lowest reading on that criteria at the lab it was done.

For example, 9 is less than 10 and 1 or 0 is also less than 10 but if less than 10 - is it 0 in your case?

In almost ALL cases less than 5% is negative (which is the reading for my PR and my onc considers this negative because it is the lowest reading at the pathology lab where my slides were first sent to). I sent them to Sloane Kettering for a re-read and got PR negative status of less than 1% (since I suppose that is their lowest reading)

Tamoxifen tends to not work well if you are Her2+ in general and works even less so if you are not highly ER and PR positive.
__________________
Kind regards

Becky

Found lump via BSE
Diagnosed 8/04 at age 45
1.9cm tumor, ER+PR-, Her2 3+(rt side)
2 micromets to sentinel node
Stage 2A
left 3mm DCIS - low grade ER+PR+Her2 neg
lumpectomies 9/7/04
4DD AC followed by 4 DD taxol
Used Leukine instead of Neulasta
35 rads on right side only
4/05 started Tamoxifen
Started Herceptin 4 months after last Taxol due to
trial results and 2005 ASCO meeting & recommendations
Oophorectomy 8/05
Started Arimidex 9/05
Finished Herceptin (16 months) 9/06
Arimidex Only
Prolia every 6 months for osteopenia

NED 18 years!

Said Christopher Robin to Pooh: "You must remember this: You're braver than you believe and stronger than you seem and smarter than you think"
Becky is offline   Reply With Quote