Thread: Ctc?
View Single Post
Old 07-02-2011, 08:59 AM   #18
Jackie07
Senior Member
 
Jackie07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: "Love never fails."
Posts: 5,808
Re: Ctc?

Below are five abstracts I just located via PubMed. A lot of interesting development has happened in the past few months:

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jun 28. [Epub ahead of print]
Artificial neural network analysis of circulating tumor cells in metastatic breast cancer patients.
Giordano A, Giuliano M, De Laurentiis M, Eleuteri A, Iorio F, Tagliaferri R, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L, De Placido S, Hess K, Cristofanilli M, Reuben JM.
Source
Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., 77030, Houston, TX, USA, agiordano@mdanderson.org.
Abstract
A cut-off of 5 circulating tumor cells (CTCs) per 7.5 ml of blood in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients is highly predictive of outcome. We analyzed the relationship between CTCs as a continuous variable and overall survival in immunohistochemically defined primary tumor molecular subtypes using an artificial neural network (ANN) prognostic tool to determine the shape of the relationship between risk of death and CTC count and to predict individual survival. We analyzed a training dataset of 311 of 517 (60%) consecutive MBC patients who had been treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center from September 2004 to 2009 and who had undergone pre-therapy CTC counts (CellSearch(®)). Age; estrogen, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status; visceral metastasis; metastatic disease sites; therapy type and line; and CTCs as a continuous value were evaluated using ANN. A model with parameter estimates obtained from the training data was tested in a validation set of the remaining 206 (40%) patients. The model estimates were accurate, with good discrimination and calibration. Risk of death, as estimated by ANN, linearly increased with increasing CTC count in all molecular tumor subtypes but was higher in ER+ and triple-negative MBC than in HER2+. The probabilities of survival for the four subtypes with 0 CTC were as follows: ER+/HER2- 0.947, ER+/HER2+ 0.959, ER-/HER2+ 0.902, and ER-/HER2- 0.875. For patients with 200 CTCs, they were ER+/HER2- 0.439, ER+/HER2+ 0.621, ER-/HER2+ 0.307, ER-/HER2- 0.130. In this large study, ANN revealed a linear increase of risk of death in MBC patients with increasing CTC counts in all tumor subtypes. CTCs' prognostic effect was less evident in HER2+ MBC patients treated with targeted therapy. This study may support the concept that the number of CTCs, along with the biologic characteristics, needs to be carefully taken into account in future analysis.


Breast Cancer Res. 2011 Jun 23;13(3):R67. [Epub ahead of print]
Circulating tumor cells as prognostic and predictive markers in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving first-line systemic treatment.

Giuliano M, Giordano A, Jackson S, Hess KR, De Giorgi U, Mego M, Handy BC, Ueno NT, Alvarez RH, De Laurentiis M, De Placido S, Valero V, Hortobagyi GN, Reuben JM, Cristofanilli M.
Abstract

ABSTRACT:
INTRODUCTION:

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) represent an independent predictor of outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We assessed the prognostic impact of CTCs according to different first-line systemic treatments, and explored their potential predictive value in MBC patients.
METHODS:

We retrospectively evaluated 235 newly diagnosed MBC patients, treated at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. All patients had a baseline CTC assessment performed with CellSearch(R). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared with Log-Rank test between groups, according to CTC count (<5 vs. greater than or equal to 5) and type of systemic therapy. We further explored the predictive value of baseline CTCs in patients, receiving different treatments.
RESULTS:

At a median follow-up of 18 months CTC count was confirmed to be a robust prognostic marker in the overall population (median PFS: 12.0 months for patients with CTC <5 and and 7.0 months for those with CTCs greater than or equal to 5; P <.001). Conversely, in patients with HER-2 overexpressed/amplified tumors receiving trastuzumab or lapatinib, baseline CTC count was not prognostic (median PFS: 14.5 months for patients with <5 CTC and 16.1 months for those with CTCs greater than or equal to 5; P=.947). Furthermore, in patients with HER-2 normal tumors, a baseline CTC count greater than or equal to 5 identified subjects who derived benefit from more aggressive treatments, including combination chemotherapy and chemotherapy plus bevacizumab.
CONCLUSIONS:

This analysis suggests that the prognostic information provided by CTC count may be useful in patient stratifications and therapeutic selection, particularly in the group with positive CTCs, in which various therapeutic choices may procure differential palliative benefit.

Ann Oncol. 2011 Jun 3. [Epub ahead of print]
High independent prognostic and predictive value of circulating tumor cells compared with serum tumor markers in a large prospective trial in first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer patients.

Pierga JY, Hajage D, Bachelot T, Delaloge S, Brain E, Campone M, Diéras V, Rolland E, Mignot L, Mathiot C, Bidard FC.
Source

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris.
Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are a prognostic marker in metastatic breast cancer, but comparisons with serum tumor markers (CA 15-3, carcinoembryonic antigen and lactate dehydrogenase) variations are needed.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:

CTCs were counted with CellSearch® at baseline, before cycle 2 (C2) and cycle 3 or 4 (C3/4) in 267 metastatic breast cancer patients on first-line chemotherapy with/without targeted therapy.
RESULTS:

Baseline CTC detection rate was 65% with ≥1 CTC/7.5 ml threshold and 44% with ≥5 CTC/7.5 ml and was independent of subtypes (luminal, triple negative, human epithelial growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)+). CTCs were associated with tumor markers, bone/liver involvement, tumor burden and performance status. CTC detection ≥1 CTC/7.5 ml was a strong prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS), P < 0.0001. Threshold of CTC ≥5 was statistically significant for PFS and overall survival (OS), P = 0.03 on multivariate analysis. Among patients with ≥5 CTC/7.5 ml at baseline, 50% had <5 CTC/7.5 ml at C2. Changes were correlated with both PFS and OS (P < 0.0001). All patients receiving anti-HER2 therapy had <5 CTC/7.5 ml after three cycles of treatment.
CONCLUSION:

This is the largest prospective series validating the prognostic value of CTC independently from serum tumor marker. Elevated CTCs before C2 are an early predictive marker of poor PFS and OS, which could be used to monitor treatment benefit. CTC decrease under treatment seems stronger with targeted therapy.

Gynecol Oncol. 2011 May 21. [Epub ahead of print]
Comparison of estrogen and progesterone receptor status of circulating tumor cells and the primary tumor in metastatic breast cancer patients.

Aktas B, Müller V, Tewes M, Zeitz J, Kasimir-Bauer S, Loehberg CR, Rack B, Schneeweiss A, Fehm T.
Source

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45122 Essen, Germany.
Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

The expression of predictive markers including the estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression can change during the course of the disease. Therefore, reassessment of these markers at the time of disease progression might help to optimize treatment decisions. Metastatic tissue may be difficult to obtain for repeated analysis. In this context, characterization of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) could be of relevance. It was the purpose of the present study (1) to reevaluate the ER/PR expression by CTCs and (2) to compare the hormone receptor status expression profile of CTCs with the primary tumor.
METHODS:

We evaluated 193 blood samples from metastatic breast cancer patients at the time of first diagnosis of metastatic disease or disease progression. All samples underwent immunomagnetic enrichment using the AdnaTest BreastCancerSelect (AdnaGen AG, Germany) within 4h after blood withdrawal followed by RNA isolation and subsequent gene expression analysis by reverse transcription and Multiplex-PCR in separated tumor cells using the AdnaTest BreastCancerDetect. CTCs were analyzed for the three breast cancer-associated markers: EpCAM, Muc-1, Her-2 and actin as an internal PCR control. Expression of the ER and PR was assessed in an additional RT-PCR. The analysis of PCR products was performed by capillary electrophoresis on the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100.
RESULTS:

The overall detection rate for CTCs was 45% (87/193 patients) with the expression rates of 71% for EpCAM (62/87 patients), 73% for MUC1 (64/87 patients), 48% for HER2 (42/87 patients), 19% for ER (17/87 patients) and 10% for PR (9/87 patients), respectively. Comparisons with the primary tumor were only performed in CTC+ patients (n=87). In 48/62 (77%) patients with ER+ tumors, CTCs were ER- and 46/53 (87%) patients with PR+ tumors did not express PR on CTCs. Primary tumors and CTCs displayed a concordant ER and PR status in only 41% (p=0.260) and 45% (p=0.274) of cases, respectively.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 May 12. [Epub ahead of print]
The influence of removal of primary tumor on incidence and phenotype of circulating tumor cells in primary breast cancer.
Banys M, Krawczyk N, Becker S, Jakubowska J, Staebler A, Wallwiener D, Fehm T, Rothmund R.
Source
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tuebingen, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany, maggiebanys@yahoo.de.
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that the detection of circulating tumor cells (CTC) pre and postoperatively in the peripheral blood of primary breast cancer patients may be an indicator for poor survival. This study aimed to investigate the influence of removal of the primary tumor on incidence and phenotype of circulating tumor cells in primary breast cancer. 209 primary breast cancer patients could be included into this analysis. Blood sampling was performed both pre and postoperatively. The blood specimens were immunomagnetically enriched using AdnaTest BreastCancerSelect within 4 h after blood withdrawal, followed by RNA isolation and subsequent gene expression analysis by reverse transcription and multiplex PCR using AdnaTest BreastCancerDetect. Three breast cancer-associated tumor markers and two hormone receptor genes were amplified: GA733-2, Muc-1, Her-2, ER, PR. In addition, bone marrow (BM) status was intraoperatively determined. Forty-three of 209 patients (21%) had pre and/or postoperatively circulating tumor cells. The positivity rates after surgery were higher but did not differ significantly (12% pre and 16% postoperatively, P = 0.264). Disseminated tumor cells in BM were seen in 32 of 209 cases (15%). Patients with positive BM status had significantly higher CTC positivity rates both pre and postoperatively compared to those with negative BM status. The most common CTC phenotype was triple negative (24 patients) followed by HER2+/ER-/PR- subtype (10) and ER and/or PR positive (9). Interestingly, 41 of 43 primary tumors (95%) were ER and PR positive. Removal of the primary tumor did not alter the phenotype of CTC. Surgery does not significantly influence the tumor cell load in the blood stream. CTC phenotype before and after the surgery generally remains identical but may differ from that of the primary tumor.
__________________
Jackie07
http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2011/06/doctors-letter-patient-newly-diagnosed-cancer.html
http://www.asco.org/ASCOv2/MultiMedi...=114&trackID=2

NICU 4.4 LB
Erythema Nodosum 85
Life-long Central Neurocytoma 4x5x6.5 cm 23 hrs 62090 semi-coma 10 d PT OT ST 30 d
3 Infertility tmts 99 > 3 u. fibroids > Pills
CN 3 GKRS 52301
IDC 1.2 cm Her2 +++ ER 5% R. Lmptmy SLNB+1 71703 6 FEC 33 R Tamoxifen
Recc IIB 2.5 cm Bi-L Mast 61407 2/9 nds PET
6 TCH Cellulitis - Lymphedema - compression sleeve & glove
H w x 4 MUGA 51 D, J 49 M
Diastasis recti
Tamoxifen B. scan
Irrtbl bowel 1'09
Colonoscopy 313
BRCA1 V1247I
hptc hemangioma
Vertigo
GI - > yogurt
hysterectomy/oophorectomy 011410
Exemestane 25 mg tab 102912 ~ 101016 stopped due to r. hip/l.thigh pain after long walk
DEXA 1/13
1-2016 lesions in liver largest 9mm & 1.3 cm onco. says not cancer.
3-11 Appendectomy - visually O.K., a lot of puss. Final path result - not cancer.
Start Vitamin D3 and Calcium supplement (600mg x2)
10-10 Stopped Exemestane due to r. hip/l.thigh pain OKed by Onco 11-08-2016
7-23-2018 9 mm groundglass nodule within the right lower lobe with indolent behavior. Due to possible adenocarcinoma, Recommend annual surveilence.
7-10-2019 CT to check lung nodule.
1-10-2020 8mm stable nodule on R Lung, two 6mm new ones on L Lung, a possible lymph node involvement in inter fissule.
"I WANT TO BE AN OUTRAGEOUS OLD WOMAN WHO NEVER GETS CALLED AN OLD LADY. I WANT TO GET SHARP EDGED & EARTH COLORED, TILL I FADE AWAY FROM PURE JOY." Irene from Tampa

Advocacy is a passion .. not a pastime - Joe

Last edited by Jackie07; 07-02-2011 at 09:12 AM..
Jackie07 is offline   Reply With Quote