|
Tom,
It is good news you are staying positive.
I cannot cut and paste as something on this site does not like mozilla firefox, and there is nothing I have found that I can alter that makes it work. I have not had time to reload the microsoft browser to see if that will work.
If you type "very thought provoking" or "thought provoking" into the site search engine (above right) you should find it.
I do not think you can call it a therpay. It was simply one mans record, and the doctors raising a possible link between his omega three intake and tumour regession.
The Linus Pauling site has some information on possible side effects doses dangers etc- mainly blood thinning, and there are other sites as well that deal with the subject.
Clearly you must reach your own conclusions in conjunction with your advisors. The only comment I can make from my reading is that there is significant suggestion that the omega six intake must be considered as well, and for me needs balancing with the threes or better.
The article gives intake figures in that case and from memory shows a second level of improvement when the ratio tipped to the side of omega three. You will have to check all food labels, including supplements as many use sunflower etc as bulking agents, and consider the omega six content particularly of food oils.
The body will also have stored reserves of fats that represent what has been eaten over the last month and years, which complicates things if the body is using stored fats.
It is not simple and regretably the trials that might give us some answers simply have not been done so you are in "uncharted" territory.
Beans, veg fibre etc to get the best elimination are important too.
I hope things improve.
RB
|