View Single Post
Old 03-23-2006, 09:26 AM   #5
Becky
Senior Member
 
Becky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Stockton, NJ
Posts: 4,179
Thanks for the article Lani. It is very interesting about how they determined hormone positive as being at 1% or greater. My onco (especially my new one who is great) considered me PR negative because my pathology report is less than 5% but greater than 3% (does this mean 4%??? haha). In my own research, I found in some literature stating anything less than 5% is negative and in other literature, anything less than 10% is negative so.... I considered myself negative. Who knows?? I do have some PR though (even if it is alittle) but my ER is 50%.


Anyway, great article.

Secondly, I saw that you joined. I am glad as I wouldn't want to not have any more contributions by you. Now if we can just get RB to join too my life would be perfect (I'm very easy).

Warm regards,

Becky
Becky is offline   Reply With Quote