HER2 Support Group Forums - View Single Post

al from Canada · 02-13-2006, 03:44 PM

I feel this decision was made out of pananoia and benefits no one. Why would they shut down a trial where the adverse effects were probably lower than that of herceptin?? This goes back to discussions we have recently had on this site about FDA regs, approvals and trial protocals.

Why would they shut-down a program where the prognosis was dismal to start with? Are they protecting us from an untimely yet predictable death?

B.B.B. (Bullshit boggels brains).....
Al

02-13-2006, 03:44 PM	#4
al from Canada Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Ontario, Canada Posts: 722	I feel this decision was made out of pananoia and benefits no one. Why would they shut down a trial where the adverse effects were probably lower than that of herceptin?? This goes back to discussions we have recently had on this site about FDA regs, approvals and trial protocals. Why would they shut-down a program where the prognosis was dismal to start with? Are they protecting us from an untimely yet predictable death? B.B.B. (Bullshit boggels brains)..... Al __________________ Primary care-giver to and advocate for Linda, who passed away April 27, 2006.