Here is the link to the full article which may help. The little box did not copy across.
I too do not understand much of it. The article recognises gaps in knowledge. It does undeline the complexity of it all.
Is it not raising the possibility of a grey area between ER+ and ER-, and even "crosstalk" between the two? Would that not have treatment and diagnostic implications. Might it not go someway to putting some shred of explanation where there are diagnostic difficulties between ER+ and ER-
I take your point about adding to knowledge. It was either post it as it was or not post it as I do not have sufficeint knowledge to "translate" it.
If somebody can translate this into simple terms with certainty please help.
http://hmg.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/co...ull/12/24/3245