View Single Post
Old 12-09-2005, 09:51 PM   #6
al from Canada
Senior Member
 
al from Canada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 722
from SABCS

Dear Ladies,
I listened to Dr. Sleaman address this today and he stated that it is not unusual to get IHC 3+ and FISH (-), as they really measure different things, where one uses staining and the other counts duplicate copies something like a xerox machine. There is also a well accepted level of inaccuracy (around 15%) of false positives and negatives. He also indicated that NONE of the IHC3+, FISH (-) patients resonded to herceptin so clearly, FISH is the only way to go. There is also minor changes in FISH values over time however I think the trend during metastatic disease is up-regulation of HER2.

From another post earlier today:
Cancer has proven to be a VERY sneaky opponent with numerous pathways to plug into when assualted. IE, cross-talk between ER and HER2 may upgrulate HER2 if the cancer is being killed by ER therapy. Likewise, if you are HER2+ and ER+ and on herceptin, you may find that ER become up-regulated. The delimma that I think many HER2 - MBC patients face is is what is the HER2 status of the mets and how do we test for it, while the least invasive method is fine-needle asperation.

The readers digest version.....if you develop MBC, don't make the assumption that HER2 status is the same as the primary tumor,,,that one could cost you dearly.

Regards,
Al
__________________
Primary care-giver to and advocate for Linda, who passed away April 27, 2006.
al from Canada is offline   Reply With Quote