View Single Post
Old 10-03-2005, 07:57 PM   #4
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
FEC was tough

At age 52, FEC was really hard on me. I don't want to be negative, but truthful. The white counts started dropping after the 1st treatment, and had to take Neulasta which also made me sick; very flu like, aches and fever which lasted for several days.

Treatment #5 sent me into ICU for a week. #6 also sent me to ICU.

I've often thought, that if I had to do it over again, I would choose AC 4 times, followed by Taxol/Herceptin 12 weekly, then continue with the Herceptin for a total of 52 weeks. It is controversial, but I still believe the weekly treatments are somewhat easier on the system than treatments every 3 weeks.

The "F" in FEC is 5FU, kind of an older drug, and I haven't read much lately of its use with Her2+ patients. Today the treatments are more inclined to consist of the drugs that were used in the trials for Her2+ people that were made public this spring. (A/C, Taxol/Herceptin)

The "E" in FEC is Epirubicin (sp?) which I have been told is the "European" form of the "A" (Adrimiacin) used in the United States. It may be easier on the heart and supposed to be as effective.

In her situation (very early stage, etc), I'd be tempted to not hit her so hard with the big guns. Who knows, though?? Pray you will make the right decision, and stick with it. If you go for the tough drugs, you can stop it if she becomes ill from them.

It's a tough choice, I know. I'll say a prayer for you....

Blessings, Barbara2
  Reply With Quote