View Single Post
Old 09-06-2005, 11:03 AM   #4
mikece
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Insist on a Pet Scan because it is the only test that is not based on tissue density.

After feeling a lump that came out of nowhere in May of 04 my wife was diagnosed by core biopsy with Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma, ER+/PR+, HER2 3+, Estimated size was 2.3cm by ultrasound.

She had a Lumpectomy later that month and the Actual tumor size was 6.5 cm, margins not clear, 14/15 nodes positive. Bone & CT Scans clear.

She had dose dense AC then Taxotere.

Prior to left mastectomy she had a breast MRI and BRAC genetic testing, both were negative.

She had the Mastectomy in October after Chemo- They found 2 multicentric tumors 2 mm & 1 mm Margins Clear.

Chest, Neck & Axillary Radiation in December 04.

In January 05 she Started 1yr Herceptin regimen and 6 rounds of Navelbine.

In March she had a full CT scans which were all clear.

In May 05 her OBGYN found nothing unusual during a manual exam on the remaining breast.

In July she felt a small lump in the remaining breast. The Surgeon did a lumpectomy which turned out to be a 4CM tumor with positive margins.

She had a whole body PET scan prior to the 2nd mastectomy which only showed a hot spot in the breast. (This is the only test that actually showed something.)

She had the mastectomy in mid-August and she is now going to start 6 rounds of Taxotere + Carbo + Herceptin.

The doctors are scratching their heads over why the Manual Exams, MRI, & CT's did not show the 2nd tumor earlier and how it could be there with all the Chemo. 4CM tumors do not just appear.


Whole body PET scans are expensive, but I would push to have one.
  Reply With Quote