View Single Post
Old 09-23-2011, 03:31 PM   #15
AlaskaAngel
Senior Member
 
AlaskaAngel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,018
Question Tomosynthesis

To answer the question, "what can see cancer", tomosynthesis sounds like it does a better job than mammography. There are plusses and minuses, though, with applying it to all those who are young.

Tomosynthesis is done with somewhere between 10 and 15 images, and takes more time (and $) because the rads doc has to put in more time to look at more images than they see with most mammograms.

Here's one description of tomosynthesis that is fairly current. The second part of it gives some info on disadvantages, which then would need to be considered in terms of applying them to all those who are younger with denser breasts on an annual basis (including those who will never develop breast cancer). You probably will have to register with the site to see the second part.

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/738988

AlaskaAngel
__________________
Dx 2002 age 51
bc for granny, aunt, cousin, sister, mother.
ER+/PR+/HER2+++, grade 3
IDC 1.9 cm, some DCIS, Stage 1, Grade 3
Lumpectomy, CAFx6 (no blood boosters), IMRT rads, 1 3/4 yr tamoxifen
Rads necrosis
BRCA 1 & 2 negative
Trials: Early detection OVCA; 2004 low-dose testosterone for bc survivors
Diet: Primarily vegetarian organic; metformin (no diabetes), vitamin D3
Exercise: 7 days a week, 1 hr/day
No trastuzumab, no taxane, no AI
NED
AlaskaAngel is offline   Reply With Quote