View Single Post
Old 01-04-2011, 04:41 PM   #5
AlaskaAngel
Senior Member
 
AlaskaAngel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,018
2010 status for early bc patients

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20602189

I find it remarkably unpleasant that there is not even an acknowledgement that this ONLY deals with these rotten effects on those who have early bc.... as if it is of little or no consequence that all of those who have other than early bc are also stuck with dealing with these consequences -- and with no way to address them. This is not a just a problem for early stage bc patients.
__________________
Dx 2002 age 51
bc for granny, aunt, cousin, sister, mother.
ER+/PR+/HER2+++, grade 3
IDC 1.9 cm, some DCIS, Stage 1, Grade 3
Lumpectomy, CAFx6 (no blood boosters), IMRT rads, 1 3/4 yr tamoxifen
Rads necrosis
BRCA 1 & 2 negative
Trials: Early detection OVCA; 2004 low-dose testosterone for bc survivors
Diet: Primarily vegetarian organic; metformin (no diabetes), vitamin D3
Exercise: 7 days a week, 1 hr/day
No trastuzumab, no taxane, no AI
NED
AlaskaAngel is offline   Reply With Quote