The idea of estrogen inhibiting ER pos cancers has come up before...to the point that some view alternating inhibition and addition of estrogen as way to control ER+ cancer.
One interesting TAM related example is
here:
Quote:
|
there are distinct phases of resistance to tamoxifen that correlate with time of treatment and expression of HER2/neu mRNA. In the treatment phase, 17beta-estradiol (E2) stimulated growth, while TAM inhibited growth of MCF-7 tumors (MCF-7E2). The withdrawal of treatment, mimicking the use of an AI, completely prevented growth. In Phase I resistance, the tumors (MCF-7TAMST) were growth-stimulated by either E2 or TAM, but inhibited by no treatment, fulvestrant, or E2 + fulvestrant. Phase II-resistant tumors (MCF-7TAMLT) were treated for more than 5 years and growth-stimulated by TAM. However, no treatment, fulvestrant, or E2 completely inhibited growth. Interestingly, the few tumors (MCF-7TAMLT) that survived in response to E2 were robustly re-stimulated by E2 after transplantation into new generations of athymic mice. These E2-stimulated tumors (MCF-7TAME) were inhibited by TAM in a dose-dependent similar to their parental tumors (MCF-7E2). In addition, the MCF-7TAME tumors were inhibited by either no treatment or fulvestrant. HER2/neu and HER3 mRNAs were over-expressed in TAM-stimulated MCF-7TAMLT tumors and remained high in E2-stimulated MCF-7TAME tumors. The data indicate that complete reversal of resistance to TAM can be achieved with the use of low dose E2 therapy. Also, these data suggest that over-expression of HER2/neu alone is insufficient to predict resistance to TAM. Based on the results, we suggest using an alternating treatment regimen, cycling antiestrogen with estrogen therapy to avoid drug-resistance.
|
Issues of er/her2 crosstalk
here