View Single Post
Old 10-16-2008, 05:24 PM   #31
Jackie07
Senior Member
 
Jackie07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: "Love never fails."
Posts: 5,809
Found this off the <Georgetownuniversity.org> website:

September 11, 2008

Test Can Help Patient Determine Treatment Changes Earlier

A simple blood test could tell women with advanced breast cancer whether or not their treatments are working earlier than current methods. With the goal of tailoring cancer treatment for each individual, Minetta Liu, MD, researcher at Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and breast oncologist at Georgetown University Hospital, is studying this test with the hope that it will help doctors more reliably assess treatment efficacy for patients with metastatic breast cancer.

“It can take several weeks and sometimes months to determine if a particular cancer treatment is working because it can take that long to observe any significant radiographic changes in tumor size or appearance,” said Dr. Liu. “With this new blood test, we have a tool that might allow us to determine much sooner if a therapy is ineffective so that we can change therapy earlier and potentially make more significant improvements in survival.”

One of Dr. Liu’s patients, fifty-year-old Anne Crupi of Maryland, was diagnosed with stage-four breast cancer in October 2005. Anne received chemotherapy and radiation and then underwent various scans to determine if her treatments were working. In addition, as a part of Dr. Liu’s study, Anne has a tube of blood drawn every month to see if there are cancer cells circulating in her blood stream. “I just think that if I can learn earlier that my chemo isn’t working, if it stops working, then I can switch treatments without having to wait too long. I thought if it would help me or someone else, I would be happy to do it. ”

Using the FDA-approved CellSearch™ technology, Dr. Liu and colleagues at Georgetown University Hospital measured the number of circulating tumor cells (CTC) in blood collected from women with metastatic breast cancer. The number of CTCs was correlated with disease response or progression as determined by standard radiology studies.

Based on previous research, a CTC count of five was used as the threshold. Dr. Liu and her colleagues observed a big difference between patients with CTC levels of 5 and above compared to those below 5. Seventy-one percent of patients who had a CTC count greater than or equal to five had disease progression, compared to only 32 percent of patients with a CTC count of less than five.

“A CTC count of five or greater at the time of restaging was associated with a 5.2 fold increase in a patient’s chance of having disease progression compared to CTC counts of less than five,” explained Dr. Liu.

“So far the good news is that my number has always been zero or one,” said Anne Crupi. “And it’s so easy. All they do is take a small tube of blood.”

Additional data suggest that the CTC assay is a more reliable means of assessing treatment response than other traditional serum based tumor markers currently in use. Currently, Dr. Liu serves at the national principal investigator of a clinical study that will evaluate the CTC results within the framework of a randomized clinical trial – eliminating possible variability caused by treatments administered.

“We have many treatment options for advanced breast cancer. The key is to find the most effective therapy for each patient. It shouldn’t take months to figure that out,” Dr. Liu concluded.

Media Contact: Marianne Worley
202-444-4659
mw32@georgetown.edu
Patient Contact: 202-342-2400
__________________
Jackie07
http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2011/06/doctors-letter-patient-newly-diagnosed-cancer.html
http://www.asco.org/ASCOv2/MultiMedi...=114&trackID=2

NICU 4.4 LB
Erythema Nodosum 85
Life-long Central Neurocytoma 4x5x6.5 cm 23 hrs 62090 semi-coma 10 d PT OT ST 30 d
3 Infertility tmts 99 > 3 u. fibroids > Pills
CN 3 GKRS 52301
IDC 1.2 cm Her2 +++ ER 5% R. Lmptmy SLNB+1 71703 6 FEC 33 R Tamoxifen
Recc IIB 2.5 cm Bi-L Mast 61407 2/9 nds PET
6 TCH Cellulitis - Lymphedema - compression sleeve & glove
H w x 4 MUGA 51 D, J 49 M
Diastasis recti
Tamoxifen B. scan
Irrtbl bowel 1'09
Colonoscopy 313
BRCA1 V1247I
hptc hemangioma
Vertigo
GI - > yogurt
hysterectomy/oophorectomy 011410
Exemestane 25 mg tab 102912 ~ 101016 stopped due to r. hip/l.thigh pain after long walk
DEXA 1/13
1-2016 lesions in liver largest 9mm & 1.3 cm onco. says not cancer.
3-11 Appendectomy - visually O.K., a lot of puss. Final path result - not cancer.
Start Vitamin D3 and Calcium supplement (600mg x2)
10-10 Stopped Exemestane due to r. hip/l.thigh pain OKed by Onco 11-08-2016
7-23-2018 9 mm groundglass nodule within the right lower lobe with indolent behavior. Due to possible adenocarcinoma, Recommend annual surveilence.
7-10-2019 CT to check lung nodule.
1-10-2020 8mm stable nodule on R Lung, two 6mm new ones on L Lung, a possible lymph node involvement in inter fissule.
"I WANT TO BE AN OUTRAGEOUS OLD WOMAN WHO NEVER GETS CALLED AN OLD LADY. I WANT TO GET SHARP EDGED & EARTH COLORED, TILL I FADE AWAY FROM PURE JOY." Irene from Tampa

Advocacy is a passion .. not a pastime - Joe

Last edited by Jackie07; 10-16-2008 at 05:33 PM..
Jackie07 is offline   Reply With Quote