|
Michelle is right about grade but there are more things to consider. When scoring cancer, the grade can be the composite of 3 features of your tumor. The histologic grade, the nuclear grade and the mitotic grade. Each of these features is given a score from 1 (low) to 3 (high) and then these 3 scores are added up for a final grade where the lowest score is 3 and the highest score is 9.
Histology is if the cells are tubular or not with tubular being a 1 and practically no tubes is 3. Nuclear grade is how the cells look compared to normal cells with looking alot like normal cells as a 1 and very abnormal looking as 3. The mitotic score is like the Ki 67. Are the cells reproducing slowly then its a 1 or rapidly a 3. Naturally the score "2" is intermediate.
So, what if you score a 1 on histology and nuclear grade but your cancer rapidly divides? You score a 5 (intermediate or grade 2) but is it the same grade 2 if you scored a 2 on histology and nuclear and a 1 on mitotic? Probably not. However, lower scores are better in general. I too am a grade 2 with histology a 3, nuclear a 2 and very, very weirdly - mitotic grade a 1 (I had my pathology redone at Sloan because of this as it is very odd for Her2 to not divide rapidly.
I hope this helps somewhat.
__________________
Kind regards
Becky
Found lump via BSE
Diagnosed 8/04 at age 45
1.9cm tumor, ER+PR-, Her2 3+(rt side)
2 micromets to sentinel node
Stage 2A
left 3mm DCIS - low grade ER+PR+Her2 neg
lumpectomies 9/7/04
4DD AC followed by 4 DD taxol
Used Leukine instead of Neulasta
35 rads on right side only
4/05 started Tamoxifen
Started Herceptin 4 months after last Taxol due to
trial results and 2005 ASCO meeting & recommendations
Oophorectomy 8/05
Started Arimidex 9/05
Finished Herceptin (16 months) 9/06
Arimidex Only
Prolia every 6 months for osteopenia
NED 18 years!
Said Christopher Robin to Pooh: "You must remember this: You're braver than you believe and stronger than you seem and smarter than you think"
|