View Single Post
Old 04-22-2008, 11:19 AM   #3
Becky
Senior Member
 
Becky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Stockton, NJ
Posts: 4,179
Saw this paper with Jean at SABCS in December. What it really means is that most ER+/PR+ tumors are just that and most ER-/PR- tumors are just that but many ER+/PR- tumors may actually look molecularly like ER+/PR+ or ER-/PR-. Then, there are those that look different from both and are the true ER+/PR- and they behave differently from the true positives and true negatives.

This is also partially why anti-hormonals work well for some ER+/PR- and not others (because some actually look like ER+/PR+ and others act like ER-/PR-).

In this paper, they also implied that at least with ER+PR- tumors, the Her family was involved but they did not test for Her2 (which they implied was involved much of the time and if it wasn't, then Her1 (aka EGFR) was involved).

It was interesting to say the least.
__________________
Kind regards

Becky

Found lump via BSE
Diagnosed 8/04 at age 45
1.9cm tumor, ER+PR-, Her2 3+(rt side)
2 micromets to sentinel node
Stage 2A
left 3mm DCIS - low grade ER+PR+Her2 neg
lumpectomies 9/7/04
4DD AC followed by 4 DD taxol
Used Leukine instead of Neulasta
35 rads on right side only
4/05 started Tamoxifen
Started Herceptin 4 months after last Taxol due to
trial results and 2005 ASCO meeting & recommendations
Oophorectomy 8/05
Started Arimidex 9/05
Finished Herceptin (16 months) 9/06
Arimidex Only
Prolia every 6 months for osteopenia

NED 18 years!

Said Christopher Robin to Pooh: "You must remember this: You're braver than you believe and stronger than you seem and smarter than you think"
Becky is offline   Reply With Quote