|
Welcome to Jean's and my ER+/PR- club. There aren't many of us. Generally speaking, it is always best (regardless of Her2 status) to be ER+ and PR+ but at least being ER+ is good. You are on an AI and that is very good for this pathology because Tamoxifen resistance probably occurs more often if only ER+ (and Her2+). However, there was a study with Arimidex where they looked at its effectiveness in women who were ER+/PR+ vs women who were just ER+ and that study showed that Arimidex is more effective if just ER+. Also, the Arimidex/Herceptin combination (for the time you were on both together) is a great combination (when tested in metastatic women - test was this combo vs Arimidex alone).
And, you are already 2 years out - yeah! It is a small club and before the days of AIs and Herceptin - it wasn't the best of the Her2 club to be in (because Tamoxifen's effectiveness was questionable at best) but now it could be the best place to be because of molecular drug technology.
The few, the proud, the ER+/PR-!
__________________
Kind regards
Becky
Found lump via BSE
Diagnosed 8/04 at age 45
1.9cm tumor, ER+PR-, Her2 3+(rt side)
2 micromets to sentinel node
Stage 2A
left 3mm DCIS - low grade ER+PR+Her2 neg
lumpectomies 9/7/04
4DD AC followed by 4 DD taxol
Used Leukine instead of Neulasta
35 rads on right side only
4/05 started Tamoxifen
Started Herceptin 4 months after last Taxol due to
trial results and 2005 ASCO meeting & recommendations
Oophorectomy 8/05
Started Arimidex 9/05
Finished Herceptin (16 months) 9/06
Arimidex Only
Prolia every 6 months for osteopenia
NED 18 years!
Said Christopher Robin to Pooh: "You must remember this: You're braver than you believe and stronger than you seem and smarter than you think"
|