View Single Post
Old 12-09-2007, 10:36 PM   #8
Alice
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: southern california
Posts: 287
Just so everyone is aware, I never had a mugua. I only had echo's. My onc and I agree if you don't have to have radioactive material going through your body, when there is a test that can show you what you need to know without it, why put yourself through the risk? The only reason I can think of having a mugua instead of an echo is that it takes out some of the margin for human error. I think the less radioactive materials are worth the presumption of human error myself.
Alice
Alice is offline   Reply With Quote