View Single Post
Old 10-16-2007, 11:25 AM   #6
AlaskaAngel
Senior Member
 
AlaskaAngel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,018
Distinction

Patb, until now (per my onc at one point several years ago) the reason I think is that taxanes were considered not to work well in the larger group of those who are HR+, so were used primarily for those in the HR- group. Apparently in looking now, they are seeing what they didn't before -- that in the more limited group of bc that is HER2, those who happen to be HR+ DO benefit. (Which means, you and me at least, and perhaps Barbara too...)

correct me if I am wrong, anyone...

A.A.
AlaskaAngel is offline   Reply With Quote